Last fixes to RS1.5

[dvk901]

Squid, here are the fixes for RS1.5....as far as I got, anyway.

I'll let you handle it from here.

http://files.filefront.com/RS15+smal.../fileinfo.html

[Squid]

Thanks, were you ever able to figure out the generals thing?

[Drtad]

Is the Eastern Royal Barracks problem fixed with this patch?

[Squid]

What problem is that?

[dvk901]

No...the General problem with the Romans is unfixable as far as I can figure. I talked to LT1956 about it, and he has the same problem in SPQR...always did. He thinks that CA RTW Patch 1.5 somehow broke the process, because it didn't happen before that.

I wonder if this is a referrence to the 'farms' requirement, Drtad? You can check, Squid, but I think I fixed that. The Royal Barracks requires 'farms+3', and I guess a couple factions couldn't build it.

[Drtad]

I wonder if this is a referrence to the 'farms' requirement, Drtad? You can check, Squid, but I think I fixed that. The Royal Barracks requires 'farms+3', and I guess a couple factions couldn't build it.

Yeah, that's what I was referring to.

I had gotten a PM from Brusilov (I believe it was him) complaining about how Armenia couldn't build a Royal Barracks to get the Legionnaires, and I told him to ask you about it.

[Squid]

dvk,

Which factions are supposed to get a penalty for having a temple in Judea?

EDIT: Shouldn't any faction that controls Judea get a negative penalty if there's a temple of XXX that's built there?

[rory o'kane]

yeah, i thought the jews would get pissed off if anything other than the Temple of Solomon was there.

[Squid]

That's what I thought, but currently if there's some other temple there, only factions that can build the temple get the happiness penalty . . . so I was going to make it so any faction (except free_greeks and slave) that control judea will receive a penalty from any temple that is built there.

[rory o'kane]

good idea. that was, i believe the intention. I assume that it gives a negative culture penalty to the occupier?

[dvk901]

That was the way it was supposed to be.

[aja5191]

Yeah, we're a pissy bunch.

[rory o'kane]

sorry, aja, i meant no offence! :|

[aja5191]

Hah, there was none, I'm just saying that we don't really like people coming in and forcing their religion on us, defiling our most sacred and holy places...

You know, things like that.

So it makes sense to have large unrest if it's destroyed, or if anything else is built.

[rory o'kane]

whew. you had me worried for a moment. and that's cool, actually - any other mods have the Temple of Solomon (that's what it's called, right?)?

[aja5191]

Well Solomon's temple was destroyed in the 500's BCE, but the Second Temple stood from 515 BCE to 70 CE, when destroyed by Trajan.

SO this would not be Solomon's Temple, but the temple actually "okay'd" by Darius of Persia. Regardless of who built it, it should be called "Beit HaMikdash HaSheini", or literally "The Second Place of the Resting of The Holiness".

[Squid]

Which refers of course to the Ark of the Covenant.

[aja5191]

The Holy Presence of God, which is "housed", so to say, mainly in the Ark.

[dvk901]

Squid, please include this file with the Fixes. These Custom Battles by Webbird work fine with our map in RS1.5

[cherryfunk]

So can we add the Ark as an ancillary, and have it confer the Wrath of God power? (+10 hit points, +10 command, +10 influence).