View Poll Results: Papal States: Keep them playable

Voters
50. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes. I want to excommunicate the world!

    8 16.00%
  • No. I would rather the mod was more stable.

    42 84.00%
Results 1 to 20 of 21

Thread: Papal States, would you really miss them?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Harry Lime's Avatar Not a ToS violation
    Artifex Moderator Emeritus

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Kent, England
    Posts
    15,771

    Default Papal States, would you really miss them?

    If the stability of a DLV related mod ..was enhanced by making the Papal States non-playable, would you mind that much?

    To clarify as some people seem to be misinterpreting me. I'm not talking about removing the Papal States, just making them unplayable. They will still be in the campaign but controllable only by the AI
    Last edited by Harry Lime; March 18, 2008 at 03:02 AM.
    Proud Patron of derdrakken, dave scarface, J@mes & irishron
    Indulging in the insight & intelligence of imb39

  2. #2
    Senator
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    In the icey lands of Norway... which aren't actually icey... more like rainy.
    Posts
    1,238

    Default Re: Papal States, would you really miss them?

    well i think they add more to gameplay and keep europeans from going crazy at each other from the beginning.

    a faction I wouldn't miss is definitely native americans, I'd much rather throw them out than papal states.

  3. #3
    gubbs's Avatar Tiro
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Seville/Derby England
    Posts
    216

    Default Re: Papal States, would you really miss them?

    Nope.

  4. #4
    Harry Lime's Avatar Not a ToS violation
    Artifex Moderator Emeritus

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Kent, England
    Posts
    15,771

    Default Re: Papal States, would you really miss them?

    @hekk.

    I'm not talking about removing the Papal States just making them unplayable, and as for the Aztecs...
    Proud Patron of derdrakken, dave scarface, J@mes & irishron
    Indulging in the insight & intelligence of imb39

  5. #5
    Senator
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    In the icey lands of Norway... which aren't actually icey... more like rainy.
    Posts
    1,238

    Default Re: Papal States, would you really miss them?

    Quote Originally Posted by Harry Lime View Post
    @hekk.

    I'm not talking about removing the Papal States just making them unplayable, and as for the Aztecs...
    Oh, well then, of course. And yeah I know you've heard the anti-Aztec whining before.

    But I don't think anyone plays as Papal states anyway.
    Last edited by hekk; March 17, 2008 at 01:30 PM.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Papal States, would you really miss them?

    @Harry
    Why are playable papal states making the mod unstable ?

    repman

    BareBonesWars 8.1 for RTW 1.5
    Integration Mod which combines unique strategic challenges due to a 4 Season scripted campaign from 280 BC - 180 AD on several big/small maps and with an ruthless AI on the battlefield.
    Deus lo Vult DLV 6.2 for MTW II Kingdoms
    Norway+Ireland+Flanders+Kiev+Lithuania+Teutonic_Order+Armenia+Crusader+Georgia,1y2t script, army field costs, Ultimate AI 1.6, big map, military career, economic system, age simulation, heraldic system, new factions, garrison script, Crowns + Swords, Trait bugfixer, religion dependent recruiting, ancillary enhancements, darth battle mechanics

  7. #7

    Default Re: Papal States, would you really miss them?

    No. I would rather the mod was more stable.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Papal States, would you really miss them?

    A conquering pope is just odd, just keep him annoyingly important in politics
    Roma, Acta est Fabula
    Released! version 0.9B of the mayor overhaul mod for IB2 Vandalorum

  9. #9

    Default Re: Papal States, would you really miss them?

    i wont ever play papal

  10. #10

    Default Re: Papal States, would you really miss them?

    hmmm idk i'd consider sacrificing them for a proper norway banner

    Favorite Goalies

  11. #11

    Default Re: Papal States, would you really miss them?

    I used to outsource/emigrate papal states to the balkan and further away back in mtw(1). Somehow you just have to reach the HRE Reunited goal.

    A conquering AI-pope would be slightly historically incorrect, but a lot of fun gameplaywise. As of now, he's just a lame duck.
    For playing the pope it's fun once but boring pretty soon.

    Though, if it's only for a related mod and not dlv itself i don't mind. But hey, you (devs) already did the gov-in-city-requirement for production most people don't love, so what gives?
    Anyway, it's "affordable" to lose 'em.


    [..] you seem to like fantasy then. Also you are not much TOLERANT to put that in middle words.
    Voted worst AAR Writer of TWC '08

  12. #12
    Omar Nelson B.'s Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Ur Mum's house
    Posts
    1,450

    Default Re: Papal States, would you really miss them?

    Voted. No I will not miss playing them. I don't think that they should be playable because they are the governing country off all Europe or at least they are suppose to be The player should not be able to make such worldly decisions! Plus I would like to see maybe the Turks split into two Turkish factions or some other brilliant addition.

    Cheers
    "Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants." Omar Bradley
    Pics

  13. #13

    Default Re: Papal States, would you really miss them?

    I would not miss the papal states one bit... As long as the pope still existed for crusades and what not. Not exactly sure how that would work but it would be great. The question is who would the bonus faction be? That's what there should be a poll about, who would replace them? Sultanate of Rum? Aragon? or the holy grail....Wales?

    As for the Aztecs... I say keep them. I never go there but I like knowing the new world is there defended by scary sun worshipers that will tear your heart out.

  14. #14

    Default Re: Papal States, would you really miss them?

    No. I would rather the mod was more stable and I 'm not that power hungry to play as the pope
    Hello. Today we are gathered here to do battle. Regretable, isn't it? but sometimes, you know, life is like that. You have to do something that you don't want to do, just because someone is telling you to do it. I didn't want to be here myself, but then my mother told me that I'd better make a reasonable show of it all, so here we go then...
    Today we fight against monsters - the Gauls! They are dangerous, mad and hairy beyond reason. In victory, they are always heartless.

  15. #15

    Default Re: Papal States, would you really miss them?

    I never play them anyway. Would be more fun if you could actively make crusades instead of being unable to make any, as you are the popes faction but the pope ignores that fact with zeal.

    Under the benevolent guidance of jimkatalanos

  16. #16
    Aeon`'s Avatar Civis
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Greifswald, Germany
    Posts
    168

    Default Re: Papal States, would you really miss them?

    I prefered the Papal States to play new DLV versions first, but it doesn't feel good to conquer with them...

    [x] No. I would rather the mod was more stable.

  17. #17

    Default Re: Papal States, would you really miss them?

    I admit that I have never, ever played MTW II as the Papal States. Expaning much beyond central Italy would be rather ahistorical.

    Siculus

  18. #18

    Default Re: Papal States, would you really miss them?

    Hehehe. Playing the papal states is as fun as it takes fro you to finish a boll of cheeze-its. Couse the popularity of the papal states is not very high and since playing them you get to excom any cathic faction you want and on top if that you get the papl gaurd, swiss guard, and a mean pasive croaabowmen, no need for castles it's like playing HRE with all your cities and castles That are maxed out. Buuuuuut a battle hungry pope ai thats based on the pope's violance/peacefulness thats something i can sink my teath into

  19. #19

    Default Re: Papal States, would you really miss them?

    This is the same as asking should the senate be a playable faction in RTW mods? afterall the papal states are just the senate reskinned arn't they? No, I don't think they should, they were not designed to be a playable faction in the campaign. The papal states should always be under AI control I believe. Also I dont think they are a very good faction to play as anyway. Its a bit like if you make the Aztecs playable, not much fun at all, these are not proper factions. So no, I dont think many people would miss them.

    Dave
    Last edited by Dave Scarface; March 26, 2008 at 04:46 AM.

  20. #20
    Marku's Avatar Domesticus
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,230

    Default Re: Papal States, would you really miss them?

    i say remove them. i hate them being a faction.

    "It's not always possible to do what we want to do, but it's important to believe in something before you actually do it"

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •