I ask because I've just upgraded the MIC in my five main recruiting centres (Roma, Capua, Arpi, Arminium, Arretium), and eventually I'll replace my current legions. I say eventually, I have three of them and I figure I'll just run them down and not send them any reinforcements for merging any more.
I'm at 225BC in my game, playing historically, so perhaps once I've taken Patavium and Mediolanium it'll be an opportune time. I'm presuming nothing will cause a scripted Hannibalic invasion. Might deliberately lose some battles through incompetence.
Are Polybian troops much better?
Of late it seems my Hastati really get ground up by enemy troops. I always use them to take the brunt of the harm, but they seem to be faring worse as their opponents get better. My policy of merging replacements in, rather than retraining probably doesn't help, but I'm not about to change that.
Perhaps I should just go look at the EDU?
EDIT: Just did, slightly better armour and morale (and "disciplined" rather than "normal" whatever that means), but not as good in deserts, no doubt because of the former.
Principes are mixed; better armour and morale, but worse attack with swords and no spears.
Alright so I've seen the stats, what about actual experiences? How have people found them in battle compared to their old Camillian armies?
And what's the deal with Gaesatae? I know they're elites, but even more than hypaspistai they're almost impossible to beat. They won't rout until the battle is actually lost, and no one seems to be able to put a dent in them.





Reply With Quote







