My Case Against Hadithist Muhammadans
Any Muslim of the Sunni branch with the littlest knowledge of religion must know about Al-Bukhari because that man is the most famous Hadith compiler whose compilation is considered authentic and you are a 'kuffar' if you dont believe in a single thing in it.
According to Bukhari himself he managed to collect roughly 600,000 reports of Muhammad's sayings 200 years after his death.
However, how reliable was Bukhari? How did he manage to pick the 'authentic' hadiths from his collection of over 600,000 hadiths? Is it possible to achieve this overwhelming task physically in one’s lifetime?
It is reported that Bukhari lived 62 years. Had he spent a mere hour per hadith for compilation, checking the authenticity, and for recording it, he would require 600,000 hours total. This translates into more than 68 years! Assuming that he started collecting hadith at birth; if he did not sleep, did not eat, did not do anything else but work, he still would not manage to complete his work before he died.
Therefore it certainly defies logic, especially considering the reported instances where he supposedly traveled to places that sometimes took days, or weeks to check the authenticity of a given hadith.
Now, to those Hadithist Muhammadans out there especially Dahir I challenge thou to respond. You can contact your imams first but make sure they have adequate Math skills to comprehend the issue in the first place.
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by Exarch
