Does either plate or the eastern style of horse armor actually influence the combat or is it just for looks. Comparing the Cataphract to the Imperial knight or the English knight they look very similar. Both are 10 attack and 16 defense, are similarly priced, and have an AP secondary weapon. Other than the charge bonus, the big difference is that cataphracts have an armored mount. This doesn't seem to affect the armor value though as it's the same as the knights. I would take cataphracts and other eastern armored cavalry like royal mamlukes thinking that they would be better at prolonged hand to hand with infantry. They do have a weaker charge after all, but I can't seem to find any evidence that the horse armor does anything.




Reply With Quote














