Jerusalem order emergent script for SS 6.1

**Master Zuma** · February 22, 2008, 02:52 AM

For early era
Now in 1100 year kingdom of jerusalem are emergent

SS 6.1 new version with
2 KOJ armies
with out Byg's mod
but with
KOJ always attack Jerusalem

Installation:
intall in SS 6.0\data\ folder
owerwrite all
Byg's mod is need

screens

Spoiler Alert, click show to read:

**BigJake** · February 22, 2008, 03:31 AM

Very nice add-on
+1 rep

**Zel** · February 22, 2008, 03:51 AM

Why 1147? Wouldnt 1099 or 1100 be more apropriate dates to let them start?

**Master Zuma** · February 22, 2008, 04:04 AM

zel just change year in campaign_script medieval2\mods\Stainless_Steel\data\world\maps\campaign\imperial_campaign

;-------------- JERUSALEM_INVASION --------------; 1174 against Prussia

monitor_event EventCounter EventCounterType inquisition
and EventCounter > 0
add_events
event emergent_faction Jerusalem

;-------------- JERUSALEM_INVASION --------------; 1100 against Prussia

monitor_event FactionTurnStart FactionType any
and I_TurnNumber > 13
add_events
event emergent_faction Jerusalem
date 1100
end_add_events

change on this

**Zel** · February 22, 2008, 04:08 AM

Its your mod (which I very much appreaciate as I was looking for exactly something like this). Just wanted to know why you choose this date?

**~~Echad~~** · February 22, 2008, 04:13 AM

Probably because of Kingdoms... Having it in 1099 would be more logic, as they were actually LESS powerful later. What about the relations with Templars? Have you done anything to ensure that they won't attack each-other from the start. =) Other ways - nice job, we wanted to do it long ago, but no one has done anything past talks... Only hope that now DLV and BC guys won't jump in, because you again used some of their content without permission.

P.S. Why should anyone have my icon pack for this? It should run perfectly with old icons!

**Zel** · February 22, 2008, 04:19 AM

Id be for 1100 as thats when Balduin I was crowned King and it was ultimatly decided that it would be a worldly Kingdom not a Theocracy under a pope appointed patriarch.

**~~Echad~~** · February 22, 2008, 04:20 AM

And it's a round date!

Yes, 1100 would be good!

**Master Zuma** · February 22, 2008, 04:35 AM

no over people stuff are used in this mod just my

**Master Zuma** · February 22, 2008, 05:27 AM

now in year 1100

**y2day** · February 22, 2008, 07:35 AM

nice....
plus rep

when i can...lol

**Chim** · February 22, 2008, 08:14 AM

Is that a correct English sentence?: "The Jerusalem emerges"??

**~~Echad~~** · February 22, 2008, 09:17 AM

Kingdom of Jerusalem is established!

or

The Crusader State is founded in Jerusalem!

or

The first King of Jerusalem is crowned!

Would probably be nicer...

I am curious, will it be possible to make it emerging not on a certain year, but on condition of Templars taking Jerusalem, or just a succesfull crusade on it? And would it be possible to transfer control for a player - from Templars to KoJ? =\

**Gwyllion** · February 22, 2008, 09:25 AM

As Echad just mentioned, the biggest problem would be with the Templars. In my Hard/Hard campaign, I am playing with the Templars and I have conquered Gaza and Jerusalem. I would hate it if a new faction would take them away, without warning. Perhaps the best idea would be to turn it into a mission/crusade.

**~~Echad~~** · February 22, 2008, 09:43 AM

AFAIK, the Kalmar Union script from Kingdoms can be redone to have Templars became KoJ.

**Turbo** · February 22, 2008, 10:19 AM

Master Zuma,

Nicely done!

This should be incorporated into mainline Stainless Steel in place of the templars (I removed them from my game as they are a fantasy faction and imho a worthless faction). This was something I was thinking about as well, and its a nice addition.

**y2day** · February 22, 2008, 10:23 AM

Originally Posted by Turbo

Master Zuma,

Nicely done!

This should be incorporated into mainline Stainless Steel in place of the templars (I removed them from my game as they are a fantasy faction and imho a worthless faction). This was something I was thinking about as well, and its a nice addition.

Easy there Turbo. If not for the Templars we would not have Stainless Steel.
They are the reason KK started this whole thing.

**~~Echad~~** · February 22, 2008, 10:38 AM

Well, removing the Templars and having KoJ just emerging we would have no ability to start as Crusaders in the early era.

And the Templar Order had share of its' lands - not so much as Teutons, but roughly on par with St. John guys... They were just mostly assimilated into KoJ later.

**Zel** · February 22, 2008, 12:09 PM

Originally Posted by Echad

Well, removing the Templars and having KoJ just emerging we would have no ability to start as Crusaders in the early era.

And the Templar Order had share of its' lands - not so much as Teutons, but roughly on par with St. John guys... They were just mostly assimilated into KoJ later.

Actually they were founded as an order within the KoJ to supply European manpower to the KoJ and to protect the pilgrim routes through Asia Minor. They became one of the major land owners within the KoJ and a very important political factor. Actually they were both a blessing and a pain in the arse for the KoJ as they were paramount to supplying armed forces but also repeatedly foiled important diplomatic and economic policies. Imho it would be historically best to not have them from the beginning but to have them as an additional revolter once the KoJ looses grip of Jerusalem itself to represent the last crusader strongholds in Outremer (like Tortosa).