Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 35

Thread: a revised look at 'the elements' {via the symbol of the Pictish Z-rod}

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default a revised look at 'the elements' {via the symbol of the Pictish Z-rod}

    today we think of the elements as they appear on the periodic table, we conclude perhaps erroneously that they derive from the more ancient notion of the elements i.e. earth, air, fire and water. i do not think this is correct, what the ancients meant when they considered the elements was quite different to the physical ones we perceive today. it was probably so that the physical elements were original considered in with the greater notion of what the spiritual elements were, and from that side of things we ended up with the periodic table and un-included the other side of it.

    whilst watching the film ‘the last geisha’ i noticed that the japanese [as do the chinese] considered the elements in a very different way to what we do. in one line in the film the older experienced geisha said of the newcomer ‘she has too much water’, does this refer to her physical constitution, i would think not. the lady was referring to the girls spiritual natures, where we are all composed of different spiritual elements in varying degrees.

    so let us look at another example ~ the symbol of the pictish Z-rod
    see image below...

    this shows a ‘body’ [be it worldsa chariot or whatever] being crossed by a sweeping Z. it is said that in one way this represents rebirth as entire [where life and death ~ the afterlife} exist in one place] with the top end of the Z being the other side and the bottom being the earthy form, the Z shape thence represents a circle.

    in the image below we see a mathematic barrel rotation representing how elements of each are in one another and the Z cam be seen as the circle bringing it all together. i doubt if the ancients had such mathematical models as they would have worked by the flow of energies and the flow of the principles. the actual number of the compartments are irrelevant it can be 12 or whatever, the numbers are usually chosen for the way they connect to aspects and elements, or by the principle and flow of numbers as they unfold and evolve.



    the elements are fundamental to the workings of this symbol, in the image below we see how there is a flow from air to earth via aether [the fifth element] and metal ~ where metal is the medium for the air element to connect to the earth. in dowsing we see metal rods being used in this way to find water, dowsing can be used in other ways but this is tricky as it requires the mind to flow by the magical Z between sky and the given object or between two objects. when water is found the parallels of the dowsing rods cross and meet due to the connection, the rods are the Z working on the horizontal plane connecting in spiritual synchronicity with the vertical plane.
    the z is also seen as an arrow indicating direction, momentum, power and ‘force’,
    in other images we see the Zrod as a chariot symbolising these forces or here as wheels and worlds. the symbols represent many aspects of druidic magic and british culture intertwines, some images are within christian crosses so were done much later perhaps to keep alive the more ancient magic. at this time in history it could of course have simply been written down, so we may note that the designers chose symbol of text.

    the V-rod

    as a similar thrust of the elements the V-rod is an apprently broken arrow, but actually represents the earth a man and the flow of ‘energies’ between sky and earth then back again.
    the serpent Z-rod
    here we see the ancient symbol of the snake or serpent as representative of power both within and without.

    the cauldron
    like an arrow a force has a destination, similarly a soul or spiritual element has a base nature to return too. this is why the cauldron represents rebirth and is fundamental to the universal cycles of things. note it is a triple disc, where the two outer discs represent the in and out door - if you will.

    we see this working of planes and elements also in universal astrology where we may imagine that the primary plane is like a canvas with oil on water painted upon it. we then divide that ‘image’ up into say 12 parts, or 27 as in vedic astrology, interestingly the barrel rotation can split between different time zones i.e. you can have the 12 compartments of the canvas mirrorred in terms of months for western astrology and years in chinese astrology. it doent stop there the 12 can represent ‘decades’ [loosely speaking] of 12 year period and so on incrementally. sometimes other divisions of the canvas have been chosen in ancient calendars and this is why we ended up with 7 days of the week.

    where west meets eastern astrology:
    http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a1...tdataga234.jpg

    so where does this fit in with the elements. in alchemy and shamanism the two have always been closely linked, this is because the elements have a canvas too! we divide it into four or five parts where the fifth in the east is metal and in the west is aether.

    i just want to finish by expanding on the general theme...

    the organs of the body and corresponding astrological aether connections
    http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a1...softhebody.jpg

    palmistry as an extension:
    http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a1.../palmistry.jpg
    Formerly quetzalcoatl. Proud leader of STW3 and member of the RTR, FATW and QNS teams.

  2. #2
    Dayman's Avatar Romesick
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Philadephia, PA
    Posts
    12,431

    Default Re: a revised look at 'the elements' {via the symbol of the Pictish Z-rod}

    I read this and I still don't get it.

  3. #3

    Default Re: a revised look at 'the elements' {via the symbol of the Pictish Z-rod}

    boing hi

    it is very confusing although simple at heart. on one side you have flows of ‘energy’ and connections/interactions, then also that we are all ma de up of what i would call ‘zero energy entities’ or aether bodies.

    the point is that it all belongs to the same thing which is what i meant by the oil on water image on the canvas of existence.

    sorry if i didnt explain it very well, it is very difficult to put your finger on - so to say.
    Formerly quetzalcoatl. Proud leader of STW3 and member of the RTR, FATW and QNS teams.

  4. #4

    Default Re: a revised look at 'the elements' {via the symbol of the Pictish Z-rod}

    Quote Originally Posted by Boeing View Post
    I read this and I still don't get it.
    The terms "V Rod" and Z Rod" etc are used to describe certain symbols found on Pictish monument stones in Scotland. The stuff about energies and the "mathematic barrel rotation" etc is an example of what happens when New Agers take some simple symbols, whose meaning is unknown, and then make up a whole lot of crap about them.

  5. #5

    Default Re: a revised look at 'the elements' {via the symbol of the Pictish Z-rod}

    i did point out that the mathematics was an interpretation and that it was to link it with other aspects. the link to dowsing is well known, where do you think people got the idea in the first place.
    Formerly quetzalcoatl. Proud leader of STW3 and member of the RTR, FATW and QNS teams.

  6. #6
    Dayman's Avatar Romesick
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Philadephia, PA
    Posts
    12,431

    Default Re: a revised look at 'the elements' {via the symbol of the Pictish Z-rod}

    Quote Originally Posted by ThiudareiksGunthigg View Post
    The terms "V Rod" and Z Rod" etc are used to describe certain symbols found on Pictish monument stones in Scotland. The stuff about energies and the "mathematic barrel rotation" etc is an example of what happens when New Agers take some simple symbols, whose meaning is unknown, and then make up a whole lot of crap about them.
    Figures.

  7. #7

    Default Re: a revised look at 'the elements' {via the symbol of the Pictish Z-rod}

    firstly i am not a new ager, secondly this is something that i and many others have researched google it before making sweeping statements of which you know very little. the universal astrology is the only thing i have added and i clearly stated that.
    Formerly quetzalcoatl. Proud leader of STW3 and member of the RTR, FATW and QNS teams.

  8. #8

    Default Re: a revised look at 'the elements' {via the symbol of the Pictish Z-rod}

    Quote Originally Posted by Quetzalcoatl View Post
    firstly i am not a new ager
    It's funny how no New Ager I've ever met is prepared to admit they are New Agers. Apparently New Agers don't exist at all. Which makes you wonder who is buying all those crystals. Or buying crap about Pictish carvings being numerological guides to mystical energy transferance.

    secondly this is something that i and many others have researched
    Creationism is something many have "researched". It's still crap.

    google it before making sweeping statements of which you know very little. the universal astrology is the only thing i have added and i clearly stated that.
    So can you explain how you and these many others justify connecting some carvings that no-one understands with some numerological grids and hippy waffle about "energy"? You could play the same game with any simple pattern - the McDonald's logo for example. If someone in the future was dumb enough to play this game with the McDonald's logo and others "researched" this bogus interpretation of that simple symbol, would that suddenly make all this legitimate or would it still stay total nonsense?

    PS Is there a limit to your gullibility? Inquiring minds wish to know?

  9. #9
    Primicerius
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Invercargill, te grymm und frostbittern zouth.
    Posts
    3,611

    Default Re: a revised look at 'the elements' {via the symbol of the Pictish Z-rod}

    I read your first sentence and decided to go no further: "today we think of the elements as they appear on the periodic table, we conclude perhaps erroneously that they derive from the more ancient notion of the elements i.e. earth, air, fire and water."

    What are you talking about? I'm pretty sure anyone who knows what the elements are doesn't think that at all. In what way could anyone think they derive from the classical elements of various ancient cultures? I can't see any similarities other than they aim to describe matter =/

  10. #10
    Captain Arrrgh!'s Avatar I'z in yer grass
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Skull Island
    Posts
    6,586

    Default Re: a revised look at 'the elements' {via the symbol of the Pictish Z-rod}

    Finally got a chance to read it, Quetz. Intriguing. Would it be too much a trouble for you to transfer the info over to the 'Dialogue' thread, to avoid persecution by the hard-headed?

  11. #11
    Dayman's Avatar Romesick
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Philadephia, PA
    Posts
    12,431

    Default Re: a revised look at 'the elements' {via the symbol of the Pictish Z-rod}

    Quote Originally Posted by Captain Arrrgh! View Post
    Finally got a chance to read it, Quetz. Intriguing. Would it be too much a trouble for you to transfer the info over to the 'Dialogue' thread, to avoid persecution by the hard-headed?
    Hey, if you can't question what you believe, why believe it at all?

  12. #12
    Captain Arrrgh!'s Avatar I'z in yer grass
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Skull Island
    Posts
    6,586

    Default Re: a revised look at 'the elements' {via the symbol of the Pictish Z-rod}

    Sorry Boeing, but this isn't applicable to Quetz's post. I'm not referring to you, but the majority on this site are complete followers, not questioners.

  13. #13
    Dayman's Avatar Romesick
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Philadephia, PA
    Posts
    12,431

    Default Re: a revised look at 'the elements' {via the symbol of the Pictish Z-rod}

    Quote Originally Posted by Captain Arrrgh! View Post
    Sorry Boeing, but this isn't applicable to Quetz's post. I'm not referring to you, but the majority on this site are complete followers, not questioners.
    I personally don't believe any of this stuff, but hey if you want to go ahead, it's not harmful in the least. I think TG would feel the same way, but wants to voice his disbelief.

  14. #14

    Default Re: a revised look at 'the elements' {via the symbol of the Pictish Z-rod}

    I don't get the OP, either. Must be some kind of mythical belief masked by the appearance of ground-breaking scientifical theory.
    "Romans not only easily conquered those who fought by cutting, but mocked them too. For the cut, even delivered with force, frequently does not kill, when the vital parts are protected by equipment and bone. On the contrary, a point brought to bear is fatal at two inches; for it is necessary that whatever vital parts it penetrates, it is immersed. Next, when a cut is delivered, the right arm and flank are exposed. However, the point is delivered with the cover of the body and wounds the enemy before he sees it."

    - Flavius Vegetius Renatus (in Epitoma Rei Militari, ca. 390)

  15. #15
    Custom User Title
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    3,009

    Default Re: a revised look at 'the elements' {via the symbol of the Pictish Z-rod}

    As a parallel to the focus of the thread there is one thing I do find quite odd. It could betray my ignorance of history, but I didn't think the human mind was so drastically different - at least it wasn't during the times that these 'mystical symbols' were created.

    Today, it is perfectly acceptable to create a piece of art for whatever purposes purely because it 'looks nice'. It is just a pleasing shape, a balanced image. There is no need for anything to be attached to it beyond 'nice' or 'not nice'.

    Why is it then that everything from a long enough time ago has such great significance? This Z device for example, it could just be a nice pattern that someone made, and it was adopted as an identifier, or just reproduced because people liked it. Instead we apply all this mystical, spiritual and ritual importance on almost everything. Any strange finds that are not 100% functional are, almost by default, deemed to be of 'ritual' significance. Did they not have hobbies to pass long summer nights? Did they not just make things to decorate areas? - No! it must all have a profound spiritual purpose...

    I could be wrong, of course, but it does seem to be an easy answer for some historians. Pure decorative objects are just as easy an answer, it just makes the finds less 'important'..

  16. #16

    Default Re: a revised look at 'the elements' {via the symbol of the Pictish Z-rod}

    Quote Originally Posted by Ummagumma View Post
    Why is it then that everything from a long enough time ago has such great significance? This Z device for example, it could just be a nice pattern that someone made, and it was adopted as an identifier, or just reproduced because people liked it.
    As a friend of mine who is an archaeologist "When in doubt, say it's religious". She said it was a standard joke among archaeologists that whenever you couldn't work out what a site, artefact or inscription was or meant, simply suggest it was something to do with religion, magic or rituals. She said that archaeologists looking at the layout of our homes today would probably conclude we worshipped televisions.

    I actually have no problems with these Pictish symbols having religious or mystical meanings. The problem is that we simply don't know what they mean. So to pretend we do and to then make up a grab-bag of (modern) meanings and assert these meanings as facts is simply nonsense.

    Which is why my challenge for some evidence to back up the OP's claims is clearly going to go unanswered. The "Esoterics" have retreated to their treehouse to sulk.

  17. #17
    Custom User Title
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    3,009

    Default Re: a revised look at 'the elements' {via the symbol of the Pictish Z-rod}

    Quote Originally Posted by ThiudareiksGunthigg View Post
    As a friend of mine who is an archaeologist "When in doubt, say it's religious". She said it was a standard joke among archaeologists that whenever you couldn't work out what a site, artefact or inscription was or meant, simply suggest it was something to do with religion, magic or rituals.
    I knew it. I just knew it.


    ^Icon of the Great Whistler, commonly used to embellish posts as an offering to the God. The church of the Cynical and Jaded Whistler God reached a height of reverence as an aspect of the greater 'Interwebs' pantheon. It is often seen as a counterpart to the similar deity 'facepalm'.

  18. #18

    Default Re: a revised look at 'the elements' {via the symbol of the Pictish Z-rod}

    ummagumma

    Why is it then that everything from a long enough time ago has such great significance? This Z device for example, it could just be a nice pattern that someone made, and it was adopted as an identifier, or just reproduced because people liked it. Instead we apply all this mystical, spiritual and ritual importance on almost everything. Any strange finds that are not 100% functional are, almost by default, deemed to be of ‘ritual’ significance. Did they not have hobbies to pass long summer nights? Did they not just make things to decorate areas? - No! it must all have a profound spiritual purpose...
    it may have something to do with these images being found on the same stones as crosses sometimes within the cross.

    the one thing about art is that it does lie in the eye of the beholder, so i can say what i want about these images. the point is though that they are widely believed to have some mystical meanings ~ just go visit some archeology sites on the matter and see for yourself.

    so far i have seen no evidence to the contrary!!!

    ThiudareiksGunthigg

    As a friend of mine who is an archaeologist “When in doubt, say it’s religious”.
    not much of an archaeologist then.

    I actually have no problems with these Pictish symbols having religious or mystical meanings.
    so find out what those meanings are before slagging off someones interpretation of them! i know you think you are being a logical dawkins type but your attacks are irrational, at least dawkins would find out about stuff rather than trying to make out he already knew.

    So to pretend we do and to then make up a grab-bag of (modern) meanings and assert these meanings as facts is simply nonsense.
    prove it!

    then get off your high horse!

    -----------------------------------------

    may i just point out to all those who are wondering what is going on here...

    ThiudareiksGunthigg, was slagging off my thread in the history section and i said it was childish as i was asking for information about something i would be the first to admit i know very little of ~ thence i didn’t need to be insulted for it. he then went off on one getting all emotional and started attacking this thread. it is clearly a personal attack under the guise of being logical as he knows many will defend this position.

    i will try not to talk to him again as i will get banned myself, may i suggest someone closes this thread to stop this disgraceful and unfortunate state of affairs!

    perhaps the ethics of this forum itself need to be looked into?
    Formerly quetzalcoatl. Proud leader of STW3 and member of the RTR, FATW and QNS teams.

  19. #19

    Default Re: a revised look at 'the elements' {via the symbol of the Pictish Z-rod}

    Quote Originally Posted by Quetzalcoatl
    not much of an archaeologist then.
    Archaeologists can't make jokes?

    so find out what those meanings are before slagging off someones interpretation of them! i know you think you are being a logical dawkins type but your attacks are irrational, at least dawkins would find out about stuff rather than trying to make out he already knew.
    I've asked you several times now what these supposed meanings are and, more importantly, how you know this. In other words, I've asked you for evidence. The fact that you keep failing to answer seems to indicate that there is no evidence for your assertions. If I'm wrong, then answer me and show us the evidence.

    Very simple.

    prove it!

    then get off your high horse!
    Ummm, you are the one claiming that these carvings have certain meanings without giving any supporting evidence. It's you who needs to "prove it". Can you or not?


    ThiudareiksGunthigg, was slagging off my thread in the history section and i said it was childish as i was asking for information about something i would be the first to admit i know very little of ~ thence i didn’t need to be insulted for it. he then went off on one getting all emotional and started attacking this thread. it is clearly a personal attack under the guise of being logical as he knows many will defend this position.
    My reasonable (but still unanswered) request for some evidence here has nothing to do with any other thread. Though the fact that you blithely and uncritically accepted some obviously whacko stuff about the English being descenced from Thracians as being even potentially valid when anyone could see it was totally nuts indicates that critical evaluation of information is not one of your strengths. It seems you have swallowed some more whacko information regarding these Pictish carvings, which is why you can't back up your original assertions in this thread with evidence.

    perhaps the ethics of this forum itself need to be looked into?
    The day that someone asking someone else on this board to provide evidence becomes considered "unethical" is the day we should all pack up and go home. Now stop whining and either (a) provide some evidence or (b) admit you can't and that your original assertions are totally baseless and utterly bogus.

  20. #20
    Denny Crane!'s Avatar Comes Rei Militaris
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Newcastle, England
    Posts
    24,462

    Default Re: a revised look at 'the elements' {via the symbol of the Pictish Z-rod}

    Well I'm going to have to go with TG here and say looking for evidence or rationality is not being hard headed.

    Hell even my irrational spiritual side is more inclined to follow the words of the buddha, to paraphrase, look for evidence and look for peer reviewed research.

    Yes, Kalamas, it is proper that you have doubt, that you have perplexity, for a doubt has arisen in a matter which is doubtful. Now, look you Kalamas, do not be led by reports, or tradition, or hearsay. Be not led by the authority of religious texts, not by mere logic or inference, nor by considering appearances, nor by the delight in speculative opinions, nor by seeming possibilities, nor by the idea: 'this is our teacher'. But, O Kalamas, when you know for yourselves that certain things are unwholesome (akusala), and wrong, and bad, then give them up...And when you know for yourselves that certain things are wholesome (kusala) and good, then accept them and follow them."

    Or as the Royal society's motto says, "take no ones word for it"

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •