Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Red Letter Christians

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Red Letter Christians

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red-Letter_Christian

    And article:
    http://www.traditionalvalues.org/modules.php?sid=2867

    Red Letter’ Liberal Christians: A New Front Group For Democrats
    By Rev. Louis P. Sheldon
    Chairman, Traditional Values Coalition

    September 26, 2006 - Democrats have an anti-religion problem. In fact, they have such a serious anti-religion problem that in 2004 they had to bring a leftist pastor named Jim Wallis to try to teach Democrat congressmen how to use “God talk” in their campaign speeches. This pathetic effort failed as will a new disinformation campaign called “Red Letter Christians.”

    Wallis, founder of the left-wing Sojourners group, and self-described “progressive evangelical” Tony Campolo, have just founded a liberal front organization called the “Red Letter Christians.” Wallis, Campolo, Father Richard Rohr, “Emergent Church” pioneer Brian McLaren, Dr. Cheryl J. Sanders, Rev. Noel Castellanos, and others met recently to form this new pseudo-evangelical group.

    These “Red Letter Christians” are supposedly trying to alert American Evangelicals to the importance of living the words of Jesus as highlighted in red in many Bibles. Their idea of living the words of Jesus, however, is somehow reinterpreted to mean support for every liberal political agenda on the horizon.

    These pseudo-evangelicals would have you believe that the Bible only contains the Word of God. True Evangelicals believe that the Bible -- each word, each sentence -- is the Word of God. This is how you can tell the difference between these pseudo-evangelicals and true Evangelicals.

    Wallis and Campolo both have lifelong careers as left-of-center social activists. Wallis was a radical anti-Vietnam War activist in the 1960s and an apologist for the Sandinistas in Nicaragua and other leftist guerrilla forces in Latin America in the 1980s. I wonder if Jesus would have supported Marxist terrorism. Frankly, I doubt it.

    Campolo’s political views are as a skewed as Wallis’s. In a speech at Wheaton College not long after 9/11, Campolo claimed that then-Attorney General John Ashcroft was more dangerous than Osama Bin Laden! (Campolo was also a “spiritual” counselor to finger-wagging President Clinton after the “blue dress” incident at the White House that eventually resulted in Clinton’s impeachment in the House.)

    These pastors are the leaders of the “Red Letter Christian” movement.

    In every election cycle, we see the same tired old left-wing “religious” activists trotted out by the Democrats as proof that the Democrat Party has a spiritual base.

    Yet, these “religious” leftists and Democrats routinely support policies that are diametrically opposed to the teachings of the Bible. The Bible condemns the taking of innocent life—yet liberals support abortion on demand. The Bible condemns the behavior of homosexuality—yet liberals support homosexual marriage and adoption. The Bible calls for the punishment of evildoers and justifies war when there are threats to national sovereignty—yet liberals are routinely weak on punishment of criminals and weak on national security.

    Adding a garnish of religious talk to campaign speeches for liberals does nothing to change the reality that current liberal thinking is the antithesis of true Christianity.

    Americans need to understand that these pseudo-evangelicals are nothing more than shills for the Democrat Party and trying to use whatever credibility they think they have to draw Christians away from the Republican Party and a truly Biblical worldview.

    As Americans go to the polls this November, they have important decisions to make about the direction this nation will take during the next few years. Making the wrong decision can place individuals in positions of power who will implement anti-family, anti-Biblical policies that will impact us for decades to come. Putting liberals in power over the Senate will undermine our war on Islamic terrorism and destroy our chances of reforming the federal courts! Putting liberals in charge of the House will result in impeachment proceedings against the President and endless witch hunt hearings conducted by Bush haters.

    Pseudo-evangelicals Wallis and Campolo are doing whatever they can to convince voters that liberals actually have an orthodox Christian belief system. Most don’t. American voters, however, can see through this charade. It’s time for these leftists to “moveon.org” to some other religious scam.

    Would Jesus be a Democrat today? Do these Red Letter Christians have legitimacy?
    But mark me well; Religion is my name;
    An angel once: but now a fury grown,
    Too often talked of, but too little known.

    -Jonathan Swift

    "There's only a few things I'd actually kill for: revenge, jewelry, Father O'Malley's weedwacker..."
    -Bender (Futurama) awesome

    Universal truth is not measured in mass appeal.
    -Immortal Technique

  2. #2
    Irishman's Avatar Let me out of my mind
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    2,850

    Default Re: Red Letter Christians

    His message is not fit by either party in America, I believe. A strictly pro life stance (anti-abortion, anti-war, pro welfare, etc) is not found in either liberal or conservative stances.

    I would say that their beliefs are more what I have been promoting Christians do to legitimize their claim on a halfway decent morality, take out the importance of the OT and base life on the words of Jesus.


    As an aside, is this just a coincidence that this "Red Letter Christian" topic was started hours after the Colbert Report showed featuring a "red letter Christian" guest?
    The flow of time is always cruel... its speed seems different for each person, but no one can change it... A thing that does not change with time is a memory of younger days...

    Under the perspicacious and benevolent patronage of the great and honorable Rez and a member of S.I.N


    He who joyfully marches to music rank and file, has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would surely suffice. This disgrace to civilization should be done away with at once. Heroism at command, how violently I hate all this, how despicable and ignoble war is; I would rather be torn to shreds than be a part of so base an action. It is my conviction that killing under the cloak of war is nothing but an act of murder.

  3. #3
    Thanatos's Avatar Now Is Not the Time
    Moderator Emeritus

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    33,188

    Default Re: Red Letter Christians

    Jesus doesn't do politics. Not only was His message not very political at all (since he was more concerned with our eternal salvation), but He would never have bargained or compromised on morals.

    So.... no.

  4. #4

    Default Re: Red Letter Christians

    Jesus would be shot to death today once people recognized him as being Jesus. Shot in the back of the neck, to be sure. We humans just can't let these whipper-snappers run around talking about unity...

    I know that Jesus wouldn't get into politics so much as to identify himself as being one of the two parties, but do you think he's got a better chance of identifying with socially progressive Democrats, or values Republicans?

    As an aside, is this just a coincidence that this "Red Letter Christian" topic was started hours after the Colbert Report showed featuring a "red letter Christian" guest?
    Naw...
    But mark me well; Religion is my name;
    An angel once: but now a fury grown,
    Too often talked of, but too little known.

    -Jonathan Swift

    "There's only a few things I'd actually kill for: revenge, jewelry, Father O'Malley's weedwacker..."
    -Bender (Futurama) awesome

    Universal truth is not measured in mass appeal.
    -Immortal Technique

  5. #5

    Default Re: Red Letter Christians

    These pseudo-evangelicals would have you believe that the Bible only contains the Word of God. True Evangelicals believe that the Bible -- each word, each sentence -- is the Word of God. This is how you can tell the difference between these pseudo-evangelicals and true Evangelicals.
    so one group believes the bible is only the word of god whereas the other believe every word in the bible is the word of god...and the difference is?

    going on the wiki article red letter christians sound like a pretty good group but not if its just political.
    Sired by Niccolo Machiavelli
    Adopted by Ferrets54
    Father of secret basement children Boeing and Shyam Popat

  6. #6
    Kritias's Avatar Petite bourgeois
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    2,344

    Default Re: Red Letter Christians

    Quote Originally Posted by Gary88 View Post
    so one group believes the bible is only the word of god whereas the other believe every word in the bible is the word of god...and the difference is?
    That the true evangelicans take every word as the granted truth, without considering the possibility of a sentence being a metaphor or carrying a hidden meaning?
    Under the valued patronage of Abdülmecid I

  7. #7
    the_mango55's Avatar Comes Rei Militaris
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    20,753

    Default Re: Red Letter Christians

    See my user title for my views.

    I don't specifically identify with these red letter christians, but I share many of their beliefs.
    ttt
    Adopted son of Lord Sephiroth, Youngest sibling of Pent uP Rage, Prarara the Great, Nerwen Carnesîr, TB666 and, Boudicca. In the great Family of the Black Prince

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •