Fords vs Bridges

**Edi Birsan** · December 08, 2007, 03:20 PM

Has anyone seen any difference in defending against a ford vs a bridge attack?

Can anyone look at the code to see if there is a difference?:hmmm:

**Chim** · December 08, 2007, 04:47 PM

What do you mean exactly?
A bridge and a fort are two totally different things.

**Henry X** · December 08, 2007, 06:16 PM

Originally Posted by wonkuruben

What do you mean exactly?
A bridge and a fort are two totally different things.

He means a ford in a river. Example: We can ford the river where it is shallow.

**SGD2C** · December 08, 2007, 05:18 PM

definitely a bridge. just because it is more narrow than a ford and you have a better line of sight.

**Edi Birsan** · December 08, 2007, 07:47 PM

Originally Posted by SGD2C

definitely a bridge. just because it is more narrow than a ford and you have a better line of sight.

The question is not what should be, or could be, after all in a ford you have your feet if not more in water.

The question is what IS in the CODE that we are Playing.

**King Kong** · December 08, 2007, 07:49 PM

Hi Edi Birsan,

I think the only difference of fords (I assume you mean river river crossing without a bridge) is that that they are wider (spelling?) than bridges and provide more space for armies to march through.
On the other side I think armies are slower on fords than on bridges.
And in my opinion battles with fords are much more fun!

I have no idea what's in the code though...