I guess it's that 3rd round that is the point of debate. In round 3 I saw a backpeddling rampage. Forrest was taking the center of the ring and was constantly landing leg kicks. After round 3 you could hear rampages corner saying "you can't lose another round". So at least rampage's corner are agreeing with me when I say Forrest won round 3.
so in your view Rampage wasn't a real champion coming into this fight because he won a unanimous decision against Dan Henderson?Maybe its the old-school mentality in me, but shouldn't you have to TAKE the title from the champ?
3 rounds to 2 = Forrest winsI really don't see how the judges scored it the way they did
so it's a UFC conspiracy against rampage? they want to get rid of the guy they've been promoting the hell out of ever since he beat chuck liddell... yes I see now, that makes perfect sense! :hmmm:Am I the only one that noticed that Rogan was in the bag for Forrest? His commentating was pro-forrest the whole fight; it was very strange