Its no secret that today's NFL game is designed to yield higher scoring games than previous. The league makes no apologies for that because they feel like today's fan, in fact, *wants* to see higher scoring games. So they evolve the rules in a way that promotes higher scoring contests in order to keep so called boring defensive struggles off of our televisions. Nobody wants a soccer score. Thats why we don't like soccer.
Now. One of, and perhaps the biggest way the league regulates the scoring is by the enforcement of illegal contact. I know that a lot of Patriots fans love to acuse Bill Polian of altering the rules to favor the Colts, but that is only partially true. The illegal contact rule was placed on the rulebook in the 70's in response to stingy defenses so as to promote more scoring. But over the years its been treated like the police treat speed limit on the highway, which is to say that the rule is only sometimes payed attention to depending on what the circumstances are. And when it is payed attention to, its very subjective because the actual goal of the NFL is an average of 40 combined points scored per contest. If the yearly season average increases substantially beyond that, the league enforces the rule. If said average sinks below that, then the league lays off the rule a little bit.
Since its introduction, its been largely ingored from a strict standpoint. Recently, however, that did change when the Patriots were acused of "mugging" the Colts recievers in 2003 during the playoffs. Beforehand it was the Rams who were complaining because they also felt like the Patriots had "mugged" their recievers in the Super-Bowl.
Since then the illegal contact rule has been strictly enforced. The actual rule is a rule about hindering the progress of the receiver beyond five yards, but we see more and more touch fouls called each week.
The impact the strict enforcement of the rule had on the game across the league was absolutely stunning. And it was immediate. In 2004, Peyton Manning set new passing records emulating a lot of what Dan Marino used to do, especially with the no-huddle. Only now it was a lot, lot easier since nobody could so much as breathe on your receiver so to speak. Jake Plummer, a chump journeyman playing for the Broncos at the time, was able to throw for over 4000 yards. Thats remarkable because that was something that not even John Elway did in any of his seasons as a Bronco. All across the league everywhere, QB's had began surging statistically. Passing is up. Offenses are up. Clean releases off the line are more common. Even this season, where we have Tom Brady looking at making a run on the record, deserves a foot note because its an easier thing to accomplish in today's game than it was when Marino played.
People know how I feel about it. I think everybody on the field should be a football player. Receivers and QB's need to be tougher than what they are today. They certainly used to be. But I guess what I'm asking is your opinion on how good it is for the game? Is it fair to the defensive players to be this handicapped? And finally, is it in the spirit of football?
I know Rush is from the old school. So I definitely would like to hear his thoughts on the matter.





Reply With Quote









