This is beautiful! I makes me want to get back online right now! If only it were easier to find people playing kingdoms I've had only a handful of 4v4 kingdoms games since it came out...
This is how battle reports should be done!good work mate!
HAHAHA I fought marsisi two times yesterday...and both times he lost![]()
JACK aught to make a cin edit of a 4v4 now that would be a movie alright![]()
Can you chat with your allies during the battle?
that is freaking CHOATIC!! Its kind of artistic too lol...
noobs, i played WTFM countless of times and when i had Sith allies i dont think we ever lost to them. Scotland is easily counterd if you play a mobile army. You just have to get enough mounted crossbowmen to kill theirs, get around the flanks and start annoying them to death. If you have good allies you wont have any problems with that. The enemy always makes a mistake.
Roma Surrectum Fanatics. Click HERE to Join Us!!!
Death is light as a feather, Duty heavier then a mountain
Thats pretty much my strategy as well its almost always the one who takes the initiative that wins. Scotland if used by an aggressive yet smart player can be very nasty but it has a lot of weaknesses. 8 player games are awesome by the way!!
"July 14, 2008: I think this is a case where Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae are fundamentally sound. They're not in danger of going under. They're not the best investment these days from a long term standpoint going back. I think they are in good shape going forward. They're in the housing market. I do think their prospects going forward are very solid."
-Barney Frank
Now that I've been playing BC a while I forget Scots have border cav (I think they're called) that a good player will use for flanking. Happens every time I see Scotland win.
man that looks amazing, although i dont think my computer could handle 8 players...man. do you need a powerful machine for multiplayer and does it lag alot?..
Army Strong
Hooah
Depends on your specs, but you also have to factor in your connection speed along with everyone else's specs and connection speed as well gamespy on a good day with everyone running to spec there is little lag.
That being said there's a lot of people who complain about lag and drops. If you're machine isn't the greatest and your connection isn't either I'd stick with playing just 1 verses 1 matches.
Well 4v4s are rare as most don't go through but 3v3s are about as fun and work much more.
"July 14, 2008: I think this is a case where Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae are fundamentally sound. They're not in danger of going under. They're not the best investment these days from a long term standpoint going back. I think they are in good shape going forward. They're in the housing market. I do think their prospects going forward are very solid."
-Barney Frank
You have to dedicate time to play, because if I had only an hour I would be hard pressed to find a 4v4 unless the lobby was jumpin and gamespy was running smoothly. I think 3v3 is good enough to wait for, but 1v1 and 2v2 are definitely the most common.