y0, i've just seen the trailer for the last legion on the tv, has anyone else seen it yet?
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0462396/
the trailer on this sites alright.
check it out.
y0, i've just seen the trailer for the last legion on the tv, has anyone else seen it yet?
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0462396/
the trailer on this sites alright.
check it out.
I might watch it purely for the time period. Not got high expectations of it though. And that kid actor really annoys me =\.
What a load of utter crap.
Tim O'Neill / Thiudareiks Gunthigg
"HISTORY VS THE DA VINCI CODE" - Facts vs Hype
"ARMARIUM MAGNUM" - Book Reviews on Ancient and Medieval History, Atheism and Philosophy
Under the patronage of Wilpuri. Proud patron of Ringeck.
i like these type of films, only for the time period weapons / brawls.
You'll get some brawls in this one I'd imagine, but the "time period" is supposed to be the Fifth Century. Despite that, they seem to have actually set it in some fantasy period, though with First Century shields. Why do these people even bother to pretend they are making something historical?
It would be nice if someone actually did set a movie in the real Fifth Century. It was an interesting period and it would make a pleasant change from this sort of turgid, clichéd crap.
Tim O'Neill / Thiudareiks Gunthigg
"HISTORY VS THE DA VINCI CODE" - Facts vs Hype
"ARMARIUM MAGNUM" - Book Reviews on Ancient and Medieval History, Atheism and Philosophy
Under the patronage of Wilpuri. Proud patron of Ringeck.
yeah you right, i shouldn't of posted iton the trailer i seen it said not yet rated, and the trebouches [<not sure how to spell] caught my eye and made me post it lol
Rated PG-13.
Says it all right there.
I notice the main lady has Katars(sp) which wont be invented for about 800 years lol. I expect this to be in the same vein as "King Arthur: The true story" as in it'll be historical dog crap but will be a fun movie to watch for the hell of it, even though i'll be pointing out the errors to my Girlfriend Lol
Only thing I'll be watching for is a nipslip from Aishwarya. This film looks like a big pile of steaming caca.
The best King Arthur film is easily Excalibur.
Bloody battles, guys walking around in huge plate armor, Helen Mirren when she was attractive(and she is semi-naked), not even trying to be accurate.
Much better film.
Last edited by God-Emperor of Mankind; October 20, 2007 at 04:45 PM.
No joke, in all seriousness...
I thought this film was the single worst film i have ever seen.
Honestly, ever! except maybe The Golden Child
I think it was alright, it had a nice twist at the end. (excalibur/es calibur)
They do portrat the Eastern Empire a little too eastern though (because, after all, it was still Roman). It had a lot, and I mean a lot, of historical innacuracies.
"Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity." -Seneca
I don't think I could watch this movie, I know too much about history to be able to take it.
The first King Arthur I liked due to Keira...this...not even gonna try.
HOW TO PLAY EMPIRE TOTAL WAR OFFLINE
"It is a lovely thing to live with courage and to die leaving behind an everlasting renown." - ALEXANDER THE GREAT
Watch my online-commentary battles here
Under the Patronage of Hader
I thought the Golden Child was cheesy-fun. Now, it's outdated-cheesy fun.
HOW TO PLAY EMPIRE TOTAL WAR OFFLINE
"It is a lovely thing to live with courage and to die leaving behind an everlasting renown." - ALEXANDER THE GREAT
Watch my online-commentary battles here
Under the Patronage of Hader
No man, it was that bad. The only thing i liked about it, was the fact it was set in the past.