Was he? I am completely ashamed that he was an American. Its almost like he tried to destroy America......
Yes
No
Not Sure
Was he? I am completely ashamed that he was an American. Its almost like he tried to destroy America......
No he did'nt try to destroy America...
What he tried to do was act in the Nation's best intrest, in horribly immoral ways. You can't just step on a Supreme Court decision.
"I have need to be all on fire, for I have mountains of ice about me to melt." -William Lloyd Garrison
"The end may justify the means as long as there is something that justifies the end." -Leon Trotsky
Nope not at all yes he did prevent South Carolina from rightfully suceeding because it didn't like the increace in tarrifs by a small amount, and he told the supreme court to **** itself when it told him ot let the Cherokee be, but he got rid of the Evil National Bank so he was not a tyrant I mean that bank was destroying America!
according to exarch I am like
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Simple truths
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
"I have need to be all on fire, for I have mountains of ice about me to melt." -William Lloyd Garrison
"The end may justify the means as long as there is something that justifies the end." -Leon Trotsky
The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be used until they try and take it away.Staff Officer of Corporal_Hicks in the Legion of Rahl
Commanding Katrina, Crimson Scythe, drak10687 and Leonidas the Lion
Nope it was meant to turn AMerica into a dictatorship.
according to exarch I am like
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Simple truths
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
He was something of tyrant but, as usual in American politics, the alternative was worse.
"I have need to be all on fire, for I have mountains of ice about me to melt." -William Lloyd Garrison
"The end may justify the means as long as there is something that justifies the end." -Leon Trotsky
What was the alternative?
according to exarch I am like
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Simple truths
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
The Whigs and their pet bank.
Being the alternative to Jackson was their whole reason for existing.
Well it seems you should learn your history before you post.
BTW So telling the Supreme court to **** off is going by the constitution?
according to exarch I am like
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Simple truths
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
They came into being for the express purpose of opposing Jackson's policies, who else exactly do you think opposed him?
So if a president wanted he could round up 40,000 peolpe and force them from where they lived and if the supreme court told him to stop he could just ignore them please tell me where in the constutution it says that. Also Jackson unlike lincoln never was really faced with the dinsinergation of his nation.
according to exarch I am like
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Simple truths
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Who is this aimed at? I've already said he was a tyrant.So if a president wanted he could round up 40,000 peolpe and force them from where they lived and if the supreme court told him to stop he could just ignore them please tell me where in the constutution it says that. Also Jackson unlike lincoln never was really faced with the dinsinergation of his nation.
Last edited by El Brujo; October 17, 2007 at 09:42 PM.
You you seem to think that Jackson a man who amongst other things circumvented the constitution and who alsoinvaded a state that was going to seceed is better than lincoln who was actually faced with disinergration of the USA. YOu seem to think that the outcome if Jackson had never been elected would have been terrible but the outcome if Lincoln had let the south go and the Union disinigrate would have been alright.
according to exarch I am like
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Simple truths
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Jackson brought politics closer to the people and prevented a Federalist-style scheme to centralize government power via the central bank. That is what makes him better than Lincoln in my eyes, though ultimately I don't much care for either one of them to be honest.You you seem to think that Jackson a man who amongst other things circumvented the constitution and who alsoinvaded a state that was going to seceed is better than lincoln who was actually faced with disinergration of the USA. YOu seem to think that the outcome if Jackson had never been elected would have been terrible but the outcome if Lincoln had let the south go and the Union disinigrate would have been alright.
How was the central bank concentrating power?
according to exarch I am like
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Simple truths
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
How wasn't it?