Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 26

Thread: Center of the Cosmos

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Center of the Cosmos

    we know that nature was designed to revolve in a circle. electrons circle around the atom, blood circlates in our body's. The Earth along with all the other celestrial bodies rotate around the sun or suns ( for other solar systems) the sun rotates in the galaxy. What does the Universe revlove around :hmmm:
    How great is he who gains the world but loses their soul? :hmmm:

  2. #2

    Default Re: Center of the Cosmos

    A giant hole, apparently.

    Currently we think the Universe is shaped like a dohnut.
    Sponsored by the Last Roman

  3. #3
    Simetrical's Avatar Former Chief Technician
    Patrician

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    θ = π/0.6293, φ = π/1.293, ρ = 6,360 km
    Posts
    20,154

    Default Re: Center of the Cosmos

    Quote Originally Posted by King of Axum View Post
    we know that nature was designed to revolve in a circle. electrons circle around the atom, blood circlates in our body's. The Earth along with all the other celestrial bodies rotate around the sun or suns ( for other solar systems) the sun rotates in the galaxy. What does the Universe revlove around :hmmm:
    That many things in nature revolve or circulate does not mean that everything does. In particular, nothing exists outside the universe, by definition (or at least that we know of), and therefore it can't revolve around anything. In a theory that involves the universe being embedded in a multidimensional space, of course, it would be possible for it to revolve around something, but no such theory has yet been convincingly demonstrated.

    Edit:
    Quote Originally Posted by David Deas View Post
    A giant hole, apparently.

    Currently we think the Universe is shaped like a dohnut.
    We do?
    MediaWiki developer, TWC Chief Technician
    NetHack player (nao info)


    Risen from Prey

  4. #4

    Default Re: Center of the Cosmos

    Well. Theoretically the Universe is virtually flat.

    The dohnut comment just pertained strictly to his question of what lies at the center. Last I checked, astronomy found a gigantic void in the middle of the Universe. I guess thats the current flavor. But it was a news article I read so I'm not certain the extent of the merit. I didn't detect anything fishy though. And I never bothered folllowing up on the article's claims.

    EDIT - Yeup. I Just checked. Spoke too soon because the claim is pretty fishy indeed, turns out. Not suprising I guess. Which is why I used the word "apparently"
    Last edited by David Deas; September 23, 2007 at 10:29 PM.
    Sponsored by the Last Roman

  5. #5
    Simetrical's Avatar Former Chief Technician
    Patrician

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    θ = π/0.6293, φ = π/1.293, ρ = 6,360 km
    Posts
    20,154

    Default Re: Center of the Cosmos

    That's more a hollowed-out ball than a donut, anyway.
    MediaWiki developer, TWC Chief Technician
    NetHack player (nao info)


    Risen from Prey

  6. #6
    christof139's Avatar Protector Domesticus
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Detroit, Michigan
    Posts
    4,890

    Default Re: Center of the Cosmos

    Some say the universe is an unfolding flat plain, some say it is shaped like a torus, some say it is shaped like Reiman's (sp?) Bottle/Cup, sma esay it is a sphere, etc.

    Chris

  7. #7

    Default Re: Center of the Cosmos

    Quote Originally Posted by christof139 View Post
    Some say the universe is an unfolding flat plain, some say it is shaped like a torus, some say it is shaped like Reiman's (sp?) Bottle/Cup, sma esay it is a sphere, etc.

    Chris
    Well. You have three basic models of the Universe; positively curved, negatively curved, and flat. The distinction is based on how you treat Lambda in your equations.

    A Universe with net positive curvature expands for a finite amount of time, then recollapses and begins again. A Universe with net negative curvature expands forever at a slowly decreasing rate. A flat Universe is actually what we are very close to, although we do not know for certain where we are exactly in terms of net curvature.

    But its all based on how you treat Lambda in your calculations.
    Sponsored by the Last Roman

  8. #8

    Default Re: Center of the Cosmos

    Quote Originally Posted by David Deas View Post
    A Universe with net positive curvature expands for a finite amount of time, then recollapses and begins again.
    Well, you can strike that one off your list (entropy does not reset, so would be accumulated over versions) unless you happen to believe we're somewhere on the First Round, which would be statistically unlikely.

  9. #9

    Default Re: Center of the Cosmos

    Quote Originally Posted by Spurius View Post
    Well, you can strike that one off your list (entropy does not reset, so would be accumulated over versions) unless you happen to believe we're somewhere on the First Round, which would be statistically unlikely.
    *Shrugs*

    I think a lot of things probably don't matter when you start talking about singularities. The Big Crunch, as the positive curvature model is routinely called, is very popular.
    Sponsored by the Last Roman

  10. #10

    Default Re: Center of the Cosmos

    As Sim said: by definition there's nothing to revolve around - the Universe is all there is, AFAWK.

    We don't even know its exact shape, could be a Klein Bottle, or a Hausdorfed banana.

    I'll settle for a conventional sphere, in my minds eye.

    Which has no *center* in the ordinary sense, either btw:

    http://www.math.ucr.edu/home/baez/ph...GR/centre.html

  11. #11
    christof139's Avatar Protector Domesticus
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Detroit, Michigan
    Posts
    4,890

    Default Re: Center of the Cosmos

    Go to 'he theory of everything' Yahoo group and talk to Tony Bermanseder, a Theoretical Physicist in Australia, butt he tends to sometimes mix his Gnostic Religous views into his overall theory, he will explain much. There are many sites that explain all the different theories concerning the universe including its shape, and there are many more than 3 theories.

    Chris
    Last edited by christof139; September 25, 2007 at 01:37 AM.

  12. #12
    Denny Crane!'s Avatar Comes Rei Militaris
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Newcastle, England
    Posts
    24,462

    Default Re: Center of the Cosmos

    How can something that has "nothing" outside of it have a shape. The only thing you can say is how are the galaxies inside the universe shaped.

    Surely?

  13. #13

    Default Re: Center of the Cosmos

    how deep is the one dimension? infinitesimally or has a quantum sized depth.

    and how wide is that one dimension? what are its dimensions - how wide etc.

    what shape is one dimension? a disk, sphere etc?

    how is existence connected to it, can we imagine that it is all surfaces of all things and thus formless - in that it has no distinct shape?
    Formerly quetzalcoatl. Proud leader of STW3 and member of the RTR, FATW and QNS teams.

  14. #14

    Default Re: Center of the Cosmos

    Quote Originally Posted by Quetzalcoatl View Post
    how deep is the one dimension? infinitesimally or has a quantum sized depth.

    and how wide is that one dimension? what are its dimensions - how wide etc.

    what shape is one dimension? a disk, sphere etc?

    how is existence connected to it, can we imagine that it is all surfaces of all things and thus formless - in that it has no distinct shape?
    Maybe you should start at the beginning, your question sounds like 'what's the meaning of zero, other than ... zero?'

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimension

  15. #15
    MattErickson's Avatar Centenarius
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Scarborough
    Posts
    888

    Default Re: Center of the Cosmos

    I'll settle for a shape computer games of the 90's and early 2000's have taught me. 2 dimensional. Wormholes. Interstellar rifts. And robotic aliens bent on domination.

    Currently we think the Universe is shaped like a dohnut.
    I like doughnuts!
    - My vote now goes for this, and here I was thinking that the universe revolved around the inside of my toilet.

  16. #16

    Default Re: Center of the Cosmos

    Quote Originally Posted by MattErickson View Post
    I like doughnuts!
    - My vote now goes for this, and here I was thinking that the universe revolved around the inside of my toilet.
    I retracted that.

    It was a uninformed statement based off my own silly assumption about the truth of a popular science article.
    Sponsored by the Last Roman

  17. #17
    MattErickson's Avatar Centenarius
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Scarborough
    Posts
    888

    Default Re: Center of the Cosmos

    Quote Originally Posted by David Deas View Post
    I retracted that.

    It was a uninformed statement based off my own silly assumption about the truth of a popular science article.
    Well then it's back to the toilet bowl theory...

    Around and around and around she goes.. where she stops, nobody knows!

    ..

  18. #18
    Simetrical's Avatar Former Chief Technician
    Patrician

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    θ = π/0.6293, φ = π/1.293, ρ = 6,360 km
    Posts
    20,154

    Default Re: Center of the Cosmos

    Quote Originally Posted by Spurius View Post
    Well, you can strike that one off your list (entropy does not reset, so would be accumulated over versions) unless you happen to believe we're somewhere on the First Round, which would be statistically unlikely.
    Or you believe that the Second Law of Thermodynamics need not be universally applicable. This has been seriously suggested in the past, I think for one by Stephen Hawking.
    Quote Originally Posted by Seneca View Post
    How can something that has "nothing" outside of it have a shape. The only thing you can say is how are the galaxies inside the universe shaped.

    Surely?
    The universe need not have shape, but it has curvature, which is often described by analogies to shapes like spheres and saddles. Curvature is really a local property that can apply to any space, bounded or not. It determines, for instance, how many degrees are in a triangle: in Euclidean (flat) geometry it's 180°, but in elliptic (e.g. spherical) geometry it's more than that, and in hyperbolic (saddle-shaped) geometry it's less. Space is close to Euclidean, on the whole, and so triangles have 180°, but it could be that very, very large triangles, spanning galaxies, and measured out as perfectly straight lines, would have a little more or less. This affects much more than triangles, obviously, so it's of considerably interest.
    Quote Originally Posted by Quetzalcoatl View Post
    how deep is the one dimension? infinitesimally or has a quantum sized depth.

    and how wide is that one dimension? what are its dimensions - how wide etc.

    what shape is one dimension? a disk, sphere etc?
    Dimensions are mathematical constructs. Dimensions themselves are not physical objects and cannot be measured or ascribed shapes.
    MediaWiki developer, TWC Chief Technician
    NetHack player (nao info)


    Risen from Prey

  19. #19

    Default Re: Center of the Cosmos

    Quote Originally Posted by Simetrical View Post
    Or you believe that the Second Law of Thermodynamics need not be universally applicable. This has been seriously suggested in the past, I think for one by Stephen Hawking.
    "It is true that Hawking did once publish a book in which he claimed that the big-crunch would be a time-reversed version of the big-bang, but he later realized this was a mistake, and went around the US giving talks in which he discussed his big mistake. Your friend may have read Hawking's earlier book without realizing that it all turned out to be a big mistake."

    http://www.advancedphysics.org/forum...hp/t-5581.html

  20. #20

    Default Re: Center of the Cosmos

    I keep telling him to take that nonsense to Ethos. He's confused about what type of questions are suppose to go in which forums.
    Sponsored by the Last Roman

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •