Buliding time

[marcius2000]

don't you think that building time is a little bit to short? I suppose that it could be longer. And builing cost also should be higher. Why?

Becuase it would be more realistic if less advanced nations would have choose proper way to improve trade and economy if they want to expand. Now I can build almost everything. I should check in which castles I could build good horse units and in which I should set my builing queue to produce good. I suppose that there should be developed nations, with rich cities and less developed nations, that have to develop if they want to expand and build empires. Now there is no really big difference between HRE and Poland. But it would take years if Poland wanted to be as developed as HRE.

We should choose - peace and builiding economy or war. And building economy shouldn't be very easy

In MTW 1 there were so many builidings that we had to chose path of development - we cannot build everything.

This is my opinion. I understand that thanks for that - battles would be more interesting because more good troops would fight. Of course - maybe it's right.

But there is also fun when we think about our strongest units and where to send them. Now I suppose we can bulid everything everywhere.

All armies would be well - developed and well - prepared.

But maybe you tested and AI is best with this settings.

[warlord_anubis]

it depends on what fraction u choos to play with.some of then doensn't have such rich city's.so i think by maken tthem more expencive would really be hard.
but that's my opinion offcourse

[Caesar Clivus]

We should choose - peace and builiding economy or war.

We already do. Castles are for war, cities for your economy.

[marcius2000]

I play Poland and I'm impressed by the game. But I don't think that Poland was so rich country. I don't have any troubles with economy - even that I produce as many armies as I can. In some cities I just built everything what is possible at current level.

I suppose that one - 2 turns more would be better. But it's my opuinion. Or something like this:

1-2 turns longer and 1/3 more expensive

[delra]

I don't like this "I don't think that Poland was so rich country". :-)

You have mines in Krakow. You also have a bunch of ports on Baltic which net a nice profit. You probably have nice farming income too. And what about all this amber you have? Krakow grows fast, so does Praha if you have it. You can reach 24k in them faster than any AI city on the map (due to high growth bonus from trade). Your units are very cheap, this is a factor too.

Poland could have been a powerhouse, provided one of our kings didn't split the country among his sons and further among other family members. It took 200 years to reunite and was the only reason why Barbarossa forced Poland to become a HRE's vassal.

In game there's no "feudal" split. So it's just a number of cities, especially ports, which is decisive to your wealth or poverty.