Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Big Companies Edit Wikipedia

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Big Companies Edit Wikipedia

    I stumbled across this interesting article earlier, apparently a student decided to have a look at who was editing wikipedia and found some interesting results:

    One American student sent major corporations, governments and even the Vatican on the defensive after coming up with Wikipedia Scanner, a software program that reveals who changed Wikipedia entries.
    Wikipedia.com is an online encyclopedia edited by general users, who write articles on every imaginable subject. Since it is written by users, anyone can edit, delete and arrange the articles on Wikipedia.
    What Virgil Griffith did was come up with a program that reveals who edits these articles, via a system where it scans the I.P address and cross-references it with the I.P. directory.


    As soon as the software was launched on the internet, chaos erupted.
    Among many revelations, Wikipedia Scanner reported that:
    -Microsoft tried to cover up the XBOX 360 failure rate


    -Apple edit Microsoft entries, adding more negative comments about its rival


    -Bill Gates revenge? Microsoft edits Apple entries, adding more negative comments about its rival


    -The Vatican edits Irish Catholic politician Gerry Adams page


    -In the 9/11 Wikipedia article, the NRA added that “Iraq was involved in 9/11”


    -Exxon Mobil edits spillages and eco-system destruction from oil spillages article


    -FBI edits Guantanamo Bay, removing numerous pictures


    -Oil company ChevronTexaco removes informative biodiesel article and deletes a paragraph regarding fines against the company


    -Scientology removes criticism and negatives article from Scientology page


    -Al Jazeera TV station adds that the foundation of Iraq was just as bad as the Holocaust


    -Amnesty International removes negative comments


    -Dell Computers deletes negative comments on customer services and removes a passage how the company outsources work to third world countries


    -MySpace removes paragraph when their website was hacked


    -EA Games deletes whole paragraphs of criticism about employment practices and business methods


    -Dog breeding association deletes whole paragraphs about fatal attacks by dogs on humans
    -US Republican Party changes the "Post-Saddam" section of the Baath Party article to a different account of the war, changing the language from "US-led occupation" to "US-led liberation"


    -Fox News removes all controversial topics against the network from the Fox News page


    -News of the World deletes a number of criticism against the paper


    -Nestle removes negative comments on its business practices from its page


    -UN address calls journalist Oriana Fallaci a racist ‘prostitute’


    -Portuguese government removes entries about Prime Minister’s scandals


    -DieBold, the company that controversially supplied computerised polling stations in the US elections, removes numerous paragraphs with negative comments


    -Walmart removes criticism of outsourcing work. The retailer also changes negative paragraphs of underpaid workforce


    -Sony removes harmful paragraphs against blu-ray systems


    -Someone at Reuters calls Bush “a mass murderer”


    -Coca Cola removes negative content about its effects


    -British Conservative Party removes negative references of its MPs and deletes paragraph of the party’s old policies


    -US University adds the “prestigious” adjective to its page


    -Boeing edits from “Boeing is a leading American aircraft and aerospace manufacturer” to “Boeing is the leading American aircraft and aerospace manufacturer”


    -MSN Search is “a major competitor to Google”. That’s what MSN added to their page


    -BBC changes Blair's drink from coffee to vodka and his workout from the gym to the bedroom. Someone from the BBC also changes Bush’s page, changing the name from ”George Walker Bush” to “George Wan*** Bush”


    -Someone from The Guardian edits the Wikipedia page of rival newspaper The Times. Originally in the article it is said that The Times sells more than The Guardian. After the edit, The Guardian sells more.
    Griffith created the tool to "create minor public relations disasters for companies and organizations I dislike," he said on his web site. He admitted that it's impossible to be sure if the edits were made by someone working at one of the organizations, although the I.P. address reveals that they were made by someone with access to their network, he says.
    Obviously there are a lot of counter-arguments to this, individual employees with access to the companies network do not represent the "OMGEVILCORPORATEZZ11!!". And you could question the creators bias, as he states himself the purpose of his project is to make companies he doesn't like look bad. However it does highlight the inherent flaws with a website like Wikipedia, just because information is available it doesn't mean it's correct .


    Links to the article and WikiScanner
    - As cunning as a fox who's just been appointed Professor of Cunning at Oxford University -

  2. #2

    Default Re: Big Companies Edit Wikipedia

    Not just big companies - the Vatican has been caught hushing up murder allegations towards Catholic politicians.

  3. #3
    boofhead's Avatar Dux Limitis
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Mining Country, Outback Australia.
    Posts
    19,332

    Default Re: Big Companies Edit Wikipedia

    Well, I am not surprised, frankly. As anyone is able to edit wiki, of course people will alter articles to suit their own world view. Are you suggesting they can be stopped?

  4. #4

    Default Re: Big Companies Edit Wikipedia

    Frankly the little toy that has unearthed all this will more or less put a stop to it. Now, some companies, some companies at least have ordered people to change these wikipedia articles and we know which companies these are. Most catholics have told me that it was likely a rogue priest that was covering up for the catholic terrorist shite in question - I'm sure their faith will be rewarded.

    Essentially this has been a humiliating warning shot, and these companies will at least not initiate propaganda from their own premises again.

  5. #5
    boofhead's Avatar Dux Limitis
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Mining Country, Outback Australia.
    Posts
    19,332

    Default Re: Big Companies Edit Wikipedia

    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrets54 View Post
    Essentially this has been a humiliating warning shot, and these companies will at least not initiate propaganda from their own premises again.
    They'll just say "Bob, when you go home can you edit the wiki to say....."

  6. #6

    Default Re: Big Companies Edit Wikipedia

    Quote Originally Posted by boofhead View Post
    They'll just say "Bob, when you go home can you edit the wiki to say....."
    Yes, they will.

    Father Mackey, please edit Cardinal McKennsy's wiki article to delete the references to the violent buggery of alter boys.

  7. #7
    antaeus's Avatar Cool and normal
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Cool and normal
    Posts
    5,419

    Default Re: Big Companies Edit Wikipedia

    the funniest one i have seen reported on the news was a CIA computer being used to add "waaaaah!" into the profile of the iranian president.

    kinda funny really. i am fine with corporations editing pages as long as they arent showing a deliberate bias for or against something, and it is quite difficult for people to edit wikipedia without being logged.

    more problematic is the rewriting of history. for example, an Air New Zealand employee was caught editing the page for an accident involving one of their aircraft that cost the lives of more than 200 people... the employee edited the line about who was to blame to make it more ambiguous, when in fact its quite clear what was to blame.
    IN PATROCINIVM SVB MARENOSTRUM

  8. #8
    Thanatos's Avatar Now Is Not the Time
    Moderator Emeritus

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    33,188

    Default Re: Big Companies Edit Wikipedia

    People are people...

  9. #9

    Default Re: Big Companies Edit Wikipedia

    My friend found out this story too. Somebody from the Conservative Party headquarters editted the article on warthogs saying that baby warthogs "smell of poo."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •