wich AI system chose to have more agressives battles

**christophus** · August 02, 2007, 10:23 AM

Hy, the question is simple...
I use a lot of archers, and mix infantry and cavalry behing, and a lot of battle are to easy in campain mode (in VH mode)... instead of rush directly on me, the enemy always stay away, but not enought for my archers, so he loose too easy at all times ! not fun... thx to say me which ai system resolve this ?

my config : system patched 1.2, with SS4 and SSv4PlusRC121_UBAI

**delra** · August 02, 2007, 12:41 PM

Lusted's? :-)

**christophus** · August 02, 2007, 12:47 PM

hy Delra,
just test lusted's, in siege attack... like any others the ai waits behind their wall... after, when i pass walls, its beter.
But always, inside walls, instead use all of is forces, he only send some mens to attack. Not really strategic in my mind ! but sure im not Napoleon

**delra** · August 02, 2007, 12:56 PM

Well, there's not that much that modders can do to fix the AI as it seems to be broken by design... You have three choices here, DarthMod, Lusted and RC and i think that Lusted's system is the best of the three with RC close second.

Maybe their authors could communicate and together release something really great? Some sort of a merger of those three, with cohesion of Darth, intelligence of Lusted and unit stats and costs from RC? :-)

**christophus** · August 02, 2007, 01:09 PM

thx, so i rest on Lusted's one, untill something more agressive. I'll try lusted on battle with less strongers units for me to see if it charge more, if its more agressive. Perhaps he see that my units are strongest than him and dont want to engage combat ? if it is, its very intelligent system, sure.. testing...

**christophus** · August 02, 2007, 01:19 PM

oupppsss... in personalised battle it play very well on VH mode, but why not in campain mode ? think its diferent, or its different on siege battle only ?