OK. First off, I love TLR. Love it. Always have, always will. Now that we've established that, here's an issue I have and I'm wondering if it's universal: The AI never attacks me. (I don't get much time to cruise forums as I rarely have net connex with my job, so I apologize if this has been discussed to death.) I rarely am besieged, and I only fight 2- or 3-front wars when I necessarily provoke them to make things interesting. I play on VH/VH and I've self-imposed a "no alliance" house rule on myself. I can leave a province with a minimal peasant garrison next to a sworn enemy and rarely do they cross my borders to attack. I'm not saying I'm *never* attacked, but it's very, very rare. Case in point - I'm playing Abbasid. I've decided to make the Muslim World my own, then go after the West. I've seriously, seriously overextended from Baghdad to Constantinople. I have so many settlements that would crumble under a decent (we're talking 5-6 unit stack) siege. But..nothing's do. Am I truly that benevolent of a ruler that all peoples, irrespective of faith, respect my wisdom? The only reason I'm posting this is I read AAR's and it seems some people ARE attacked and some people ARE nailed for being overextended. And, finally, it seems that I used to be attacked in TLR but someone has turned on the Passivity bug or what-not. Same version. Odd. A copper for your thoughts - D




Reply With Quote






