The man-made-global-warming hoax

[Wilhelm von Nassau]

I couldn't really find a topic about this documentary, (well, I didn't have the courage to search the forums) which was quite surprising to me, so I decided to post this movie.

I have always placed question marks on Al Gore's movie. After watching this channel 4 documentary I was convinced: man made global warming is the biggest hoax in human history.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...33351566&hl=nl

[MonTeZuma]

I couldn't really find a topic about this documentary, (well, I didn't have the courage to search the forums) which was quite surprising to me, so I decided to post this movie.

I have always placed question marks on Al Gore's movie. After watching this channel 4 documentary I was convinced: man made global warming is the biggest hoax in human history.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...33351566&hl=nl

I heard a similar think on the radio where global warming was questioned and blamed on the solar something or other (winds I think). But they had both sides of the argument 1 saying man made the other saying its natural.

In saying that be warned Nordic fellows and Scots apparently before an ice age there is a period of sustained global warning.
Great news for Snows borders, bad news for beach wear companies.

[sapi]

The only global warming swindle is that film

It was on TV the other night; didn't even consider watching it, considering I kept up with the scientific dissection of its so-called 'facts' after the BBC4 showing

Trust me, it doesn't have a leg to stand on

[Wilhelm von Nassau]

The only global warming swindle is that film

It was on TV the other night; didn't even consider watching it, considering I kept up with the scientific dissection of its so-called 'facts' after the BBC4 showing

Trust me, it doesn't have a leg to stand on

How can you even judge it when you didn't watch it? It clearly shows Al Gore is juggling with data and graphs. Talking about scientific dissection...

[removeduser_487563287433]

How can you even judge it when you didn't watch it? It clearly shows Al Gore is juggling with data and graphs. Talking about scientific dissection...

Please, please, before you ever speak about this again read the Times article ripping it apart that I just posted.

[sapi]

How can you even judge it when you didn't watch it? It clearly shows Al Gore is juggling with data and graphs. Talking about scientific dissection...

*points to ferret's post

I don't need to watch propaganda to know it stinks - especially in the age of the internet

[removeduser_487563287433]

Oh yes! Yes! This will be so much fun! So much!

You are obviously not aware that this entire 'documentary' was slammed by many British scientists the next day after its showing and when a proffessor from the Imperial College of London emailed the producer his concerns that the data used was entirely wrong he received only the reply "you are a big daft cock."

If you ever want a perfect example of how the idea of global warming being a "hoax" is the real hoax it's some person unthinkingly citing this documentary on a forum!

Summary version of my post: HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH

This is what I posted the last time someone made the mistake of citing this bollocks:

Haha, oh my, too easy.

Sorry to break this up, but I'm afraid you've all praised this show far too quickly. After this show was produced a plethora of errors were pointed out by the scientific community, that ranged from the data being absent, the conclusions being incorrect or it just being out of date.

When a proffessor of Imperial College London emailed the producer of the show with his concerns, he replied " you're a big daft cock." Proving scientific debate is not dead yet.

Here's the article in full, read it and hopefully develop your opinion, because like it or not, this show is more a swindle than anything else on television this year.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle1517515.ece

Summary: Don't waste your time watching this show. It has long since been debunked as propaganda.

I mean, you guys, all crowding around this hooting and hollering, calling everybody else 'envirofundamentalists' when you haven't even taken the time of a google search to see how flawed this show was? That's fundamentalism. I'd laugh if I didn't feel embarrassed for you.

[Wilhelm von Nassau]

Oh yes! Yes! This will be so much fun! So much!

You are obviously not aware that this entire 'documentary' was slammed by many British scientists the next day after its showing and when a proffessor from the Imperial College of London emailed the producer his concerns that the data used was entirely wrong he received only the reply "you are a big daft cock."

If you ever want a perfect example of how the idea of global warming being a "hoax" is the real hoax it's some person unthinkingly citing this documentary on a forum!

Summary version of my post: HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH

This is what I posted the last time someone made the mistake of citing this bollocks:

They slam it because this hoax is bringing in big money. To many scientist are dependend on it.

[removeduser_487563287433]

They slam it because this hoax is bringing in big money. To many scientist are dependend on it.

No they slam it because it's bollocks! Read the ****ing article I posted! You have been swindled by the great global warming swindle!

[Wilhelm von Nassau]

No they slam it because it's bollocks! Read the ****ing article I posted! You have been swindled by the great global warming swindle!

That piece of crap has to prove Al Gore is right? Its just about some scientist concerned about his ego. If you really want to make me laugh you should tickle my armpits.

[removeduser_487563287433]

That piece of crap has to prove Al Gore is right? Its just about some scientist concerned about his ego. If you really want to make me laugh you should tickle my armpits.

FORGET ****ING AL GORE AND READ THIS ****ING ARTICLE!

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle1517515.ece

And I mean properly. It points out where the documentary was flawed neatly, for people like you to understand.

[Gary88]

yeah that docuentary was bollocks i watched parts of it. the solar winds idea is bollocks as solar output has remained constant since records began yet is blamed for heating within that time. it also doesnt change the facts (and laws of physics) that CO2 absorbs and emitts infra red energy better than non greenhouse gasses and that we have rapidly increased the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere in the last 200 years

[Gary88]

They slam it because this hoax is bringing in big money. To many scientist are dependend on it.

the most money in Global warming is going to try and combat its effects by investing in greener energy sources. if scientists get any money its for research it isnt a pay rise so all they get out of it is a trip to some hell hole like the arctic circle to use some equipment they already have...so what good does it do them? besides scientists aren't even calling for masses of research they are calling for action

[removeduser_487563287433]

I love the idea that global warming is some big money spinner.

"Mwahahhahahahhahaha! Already the public seperate their paper, cans and glass from ordinary rubbish. FOOLS! Soon it shall be too late and I shall control the world!"

[Gary88]

Its just about some scientist concerned about his ego.

no it shows a real scientist trying to have a serious debate and the guy who made the program is a rude idiot. i mean for christs sake the Guy used 15year old data that has long since been disproved

[Juggernawt]

Anyone who claims that mankind has not had any adverse effect on out climate today is either very daft or on the take. Think for yourselves a little, don't just spout off any old rubish you've seen on the telly.

[removeduser_487563287433]

Okay, since you're not going to read the article I will post some damn things for you, to make it harder for you to stick your fingers in your ears and scream, "la la la, I'm not listening!"

Where Channel 4 got it wrong over climate change

Claim: Ice core data shows that carbon dioxide levels rise after temperatures go up, not before

Fact: This is correct, but climate scientists have a good explanation. There is a substantial feedback effect – initial small rises in temperature lead to substantial release of carbon dioxide from natural reservoirs in the oceans, which then produce much steeper warming later on

Claim: Temperatures in the troposphere, the lower part of the atmosphere, have not risen as predicted by the models

Fact: This was once the case, but it has been resolved now that initial measurement errors have been corrected

Claim: Temperatures rose for the first part of the century, then cooled for three decades before warming again. There is no link to carbon dioxide

Fact: Temperatures did follow this pattern, but again there is a good explanation. The mid-century effect fall came about chiefly because of sulphate aerosols – particles that have a cooling effect on the atmosphere. These are no longer produced so heavily by industry because of environmental regulations to combat other problems, such as acid rain

Source: Mark Henderson, Science Editor

Muahahahahahahahah. Soon, I, Al Gore shall rule the world!

For Christ's sake! The documentary is proven bollocks! You harm your intelligence by defending it!

[OTZ]

Okay, since you're not going to read the article I will post some damn things for you, to make it harder for you to stick your fingers in your ears and scream, "la la la, I'm not listening!"



Muahahahahahahahah. Soon, I, Al Gore shall rule the world!

For Christ's sake! The documentary is proven bollocks! You harm your intelligence by defending it!

The "facts" used to debunk this show aren't exactly facts...Not that I'm taking a stand either way, but this article doesn't do enough to definitively label Channel 4's show as complete "bollocks."

[Gary88]

Forget the ****ing article and watch the doc. And yes I did read it, but who's to tell its right? Just like "an inconvenient truth" and the swindle its just a claim. I tend to believe the truest claim.

yeah and the truest claims come from actual scientists using up to date evidence people like...the IPCC who concluded it is very likely that global warming is mans fault. ignore al gore ignore martin durkin the film maker, listen to real science

[Wilhelm von Nassau]

yeah and the truest claims come from actual scientists using up to date evidence people like...the IPCC who concluded it is very likely that global warming is mans fault. ignore al gore ignore martin durkin the film maker, listen to real science

The IPCC is an even bigger scam. What about those 2500 top scientist on its list? half of them are no scientists and there are an awfull lot of real scientists on the list who disagree with the theory and are even now trying to get their name of it. These things you don't hear in the media and even Ferrets almighty 'article' doesn't argue it.