Issue number one: The Church-State Problem
In July of 2002, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) won a long fought battle to remove a cross from the Mohave Desert public preserve, as a Federal judge ruled that it was in breach of the "establishment" clause of the Constitution.
Of the case, Peter Eliasberg, an attorney at the ACLU stated, "The federal government should not offer public land – owned collectively by people of every faith and of no faith – as a site for the advertisement and promotion of Jesus Christ, Buddha, Pope John Paul II, or any other particular religious figure. Contrary to what some believe, it is not the role of the federal government to advance Christianity or any other sectarian belief." He further stated, "The courts have consistently held that a permanent religious fixture on federal land is a violation of the U.S. Constitution."
While the ACLU feels it necessary to take action against symbols of the Christian faith, it seems they do not attribute the same set of standards to Islam.
The group that wants to use the Iowa site calls itself Muslim Youth Camps of America, Inc. (MYCA). Organizers of MYCA say they purposely chose the name so that it would resemble that of the YMCA, the well-known Christian nationwide health and fitness center. "It is not exclusively for Muslims, just like YMCA is not exclusive to Christians," states Manzoor Ali, the Chairman of MYCA. But this statement doesn't exactly jibe with some of the other statements made by the group.
At a hearing for the land proposal, the following statements were made by Mark Chaffee, the Project Director for MYCA:
"I don't know what you know about the Muslim community, but here in the United States right now it currently is encompassing 48 nationalities. So the camp has to have this immense multi-cultural focus to it and have that sort of an outreach to it. And our outreach and marketing will be heavily towards the Muslim community, because of its underserved nature."
(Concerning his colleague's statement about separate plans for boys and girls at the camp

"The perception of the gender is similar to gender issues in the United States in religion…So it really just depends on which piece of the Islamic community that you are at [sic.] the moment as to that gender."
Of course, all of these statements come with caveats alluding to the group's supposedly all-inclusive nature. But then, when one reads the March 2000 edition of the Washington Report, which features a story about MYCA, one may very well get the true nature of the group. It states that Bill Aossey, Representative for MYCA, announced that the camp/convention center "has been purchased and given the name ‘Camp Heritage' to emphasize the importance for Muslim children of understanding their roots."
These statements, including the fact that the proposed site will contain of a 36-foot dome-covered prayer tower, has not fazed the ACLU. Concerning the matter, the ICLU, the Iowa branch of the ACLU (who in March of 2000 condemned a proposal by 12 legislators to require posting of the Ten Commandments in the Iowa State Senate chamber) had this to say: "There is no establishment clause violation in government permitting the building of a structure that resembles a mosque or church…we are unaware of any cases involving governmental religious displays based on the theory that certain public architecture is an endorsement of one religion over another…this is not the case in which to try that argument out…."
When the topic of the Constitutionality of this matter was brought up at the land proposal hearing, Manzoor Ali quickly chimed in and changed the subject ("No, no. I think we don't want to take much of your time.") Why? What does his group have to hide that he couldn't discuss this?