Without Apartheid would South Africa be the wealthy and powerful state that it is?
Under apartheid the farms, mines, and industries remained in the hands of Whites who had owned them for generations, who know what they are doing and kept the state wealthy. SA was not torn by Civil War and was even able to influence other states wars. SA is the only country I can think of in Southern Africa which has free and fair elections.
By contrast, in Rhodesia, Mugabe took the farmland, some of the best in the world which had earned Rhodesia the name 'The Breadbasket of Africa', from the whites and gave it to his black followers who had no farming experience.
He turned a state considered wealthy by Western standards into the impoverished dictatorship of Zimbabwe
Therefore, did Apartheid prevent South Africa following this course and keep it wealthy and stable?




Reply With Quote















