
Originally Posted by
Anthony
Scots in a strict sense didn't exist yet. 'Scotti' was just a (derogatory) slang term for Gaels, specifically Gaelic pirates and raiders (and was then freely applied to Gaelic inhabitants of the Pictish coasts, who were Dalriatta from Ireland). However, it came to be the regular Latin term for all Gaels (for example, the term for the king of all Ireland in Latin in the Catholic Church was 'Scotorum Imperator'; 'Emperor of the Irish/Scots, Gaels'). The reason Picts are mentioned so much is that they were adjacent to imperial territories, and that the Romans really had no concept of what the Pictish political landscape was like (for example that they were being armed by Gaelic kings). 'Scots', as they would come to be, were Gaels from Ireland, and having 'Scotti' would be totally erroneous and ahistoric (they were a tiny, almost totally unimportant group for centuries, and in this period were regularly subverted to an Irish king or a Pictish one). The Irish kept record of what was going on fairly well after converting.