Search:

Type: Posts; User: Aikanár; Keyword(s):

Page 1 of 13 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.26 seconds.

  1. Replies
    95
    Views
    2,526

    [VOTE FINISHED: FAILED] Re: [Amendment] Section III, Article I

    Exactly.

    Opposed.
  2. [VOTE FINISHED: PASSED: IMPLEMENTED] Re: [Award] Callistonian for Modding Service Award

    Support.
  3. Replies
    7
    Views
    514

    [VOTE FINISHED: PASSED: IMPLEMENTED] Re: [AWARD] youneuoy for Opifex

    This is great work and a great proposal for a man really deserving it. Full support!
  4. Replies
    39
    Views
    1,213

    [ABANDONED] Re: [Amendment] Legio 501st Clarifications

    You definitely had your tea today, otherwise I can't figure why you're so reasonable :P

    Joking aside. I wasn't around when that was created, but I had the impression more like Araval has: 1 thing...
  5. [VOTE FINISHED: PASSED: IMPLEMENTED] Re: [Award] General Brewster for Legio 501st (Silver)

    Br-who?

    ;)

    Sure thing, Bro Brew got my support for this one.
  6. [VOTE FINISHED: PASSED: IMPLEMENTED] Re: [AWARD] BraselC5048 for Legio 501st Modder [Bronze]

    Testing is a vital part of all modding. I've spent weeks and months on testing. When you do coding or scripting or table editing, you need to test a hell of a lot and that costs plenty of time....
  7. Replies
    135
    Views
    3,415

    [VOTE FINISHED: FAILED] Re: [Amendment] Section 3 - Article I

    I have no issue with the 72 hour grace period for starting an Appeal. My issue is with lowering the threshold from none to more infractions.
  8. Replies
    135
    Views
    3,415

    [VOTE FINISHED: FAILED] Re: [Amendment] Section 3 - Article I

    Or the application of the referral system was comically lax, biased, unfair and toothless to some.

    If anything, the current system is the most fair system we ever had since everybody is treated...
  9. [VOTE FINISHED: PASSED: IMPLEMENTED] Re: [AWARD] -Durango- for Legio 501st Modder [Bronze]

    You have my mace.. or screwdriver, the choice is yours.
  10. [VOTE FINISHED: PASSED: IMPLEMENTED] Re: [AWARD] -Durango- for Legio 501st Modder [Bronze]

    New try
  11. Replies
    135
    Views
    3,415

    [VOTE FINISHED: FAILED] Re: [Amendment] Section 3 - Article I

    Also, infractions, as has been exhaustively eplained, are not the first interaction between moderation and a citizen. Receiving an infraction means, that a citizen already has broken the rule at...
  12. Replies
    135
    Views
    3,415

    [VOTE FINISHED: FAILED] Re: [Amendment] Section 3 - Article I

    Cheers for providing us with your reasoning and vote. Even though I don't agree with, you and voted against this proposal, I do respect your opinion.

    Just one little thing I like to add,...
  13. Replies
    135
    Views
    3,415

    [VOTE FINISHED: FAILED] Re: [Amendment] Section 3 - Article I

    Last time we both agreed in a curial discussion has been for some time, hasn't it? Pike, you have put that good! I concur and I encourage everybody to vote against this.
  14. [VOTE FINISHED: PASSED: IMPLEMENTED] Re: [AWARD] -Durango- for Legio 501st Modder [Bronze]

    I support the candidate. However, how about upgrading this to silver?

    He has another mod released: Durangos Interface Visual Enhancement Mod 1.0

    Pike, what do you think, rise it up a level?
  15. Replies
    10
    Views
    190

    Poll: Re: [Artifex] Gyrosmeister

    Good to See him brought here (so I don't have to do it).

    I like his work and I like his humor.

    I fully support Gyrosmeister for Großgyrosmeister err Artifex.
  16. [VOTE FINISHED: PASSED: IMPLEMENTED] Re: [AWARD] Steph for Legio 501st Modder [Gold]

    Nobrainer. Support!
  17. [VOTE FINISHED: PASSED: IMPLEMENTED] Re: [AWARD] KurdishNomad for Legio 501st Modder (Gold)

    Wow! Mak, what a great modder and what awesome and original mods. Easy Gold Support. Easy artifex Support.
  18. Replies
    8
    Views
    356

    [VOTE FINISHED: PASSED: IMPLEMENTED] Re: [AWARD] Muizer for Opifex

    As with the other proposal, If he is okay with it, he will have my sword!
  19. [VOTE FINISHED: PASSED: IMPLEMENTED] Re: [AWARD] Muizer for Legio 501st Modder [Gold]

    If he who dwells in exile is willing to accept this, then I wholeheartedly support!
  20. [VOTE FINISHED: PASSED: IMPLEMENTED] Re: [AWARD] Gyrosmeister for Legio 501st Modder [Gold]

    Feel free to sponsor him, Akar. I've not made contact yet, no paragraphs have been written, so no harm done. There are plenty of other worthy people out there.
  21. [VOTE FINISHED: PASSED: IMPLEMENTED] Re: [AWARD] Gyrosmeister for Legio 501st Modder [Silver]

    ^ Or Artifex even. Yes.

    I go with Gold instead for his tutorials and if nobody else isinterested in sponsoring him, will get in touch with regards to citizenship.

    Rank of medal changed to Gold....
  22. [VOTE FINISHED: PASSED: IMPLEMENTED] Re: [AWARD] Gyrosmeister for Legio 501st Modder [Silver]

    To be honest with you, I was on the fence with this one. My first impression suggested the gold award, but then I opted for Silver for a save shot if you will. We could change the proposal from...
  23. [VOTE FINISHED: PASSED: IMPLEMENTED] [AWARD] Gyrosmeister for Legio 501st Modder [Gold]

    Esteemed fellow Citizens... oh my don't come around here no more, with another thread opening like that, Aik.

    Alright, as you wish, Aik.

    Beloved fellow Citizens,

    I come here before you today...
  24. [VOTE FINISHED: PASSED: IMPLEMENTED] [AWARD] Havie for Legio 501st Modder [Silver]

    Esteemed fellow citizens,

    I come before you today to present to you Havie for the Legio 501st Modder (silver) award.



    For those of you who are not familiar with him, who was active mostly in...
  25. Replies
    135
    Views
    3,415

    [VOTE FINISHED: FAILED] Re: [Amendment] Section 3 - Article I

    I oppose the current OP, because of reasons already stated.
  26. [VOTE FINISHED: PASSED: IMPLEMENTED] Re: [AWARD] Withwnar for Legio 501st Modder (Gold)

    Thank-you for asking. I would like to leave this open till saturday, so that people have time if anyobdy would like to rise a concern still (I doubt that) and then I would like to ask you to move it...
  27. Re: US Forces In Full Scale Retreat From Afghanistan; 20 years of War Ending In Total Military Defeat?

    Gentlemen,

    please bear in mind that personal references are off-topic outside the administrative forums. Also, they are not allowed according to the D&D forum rules. Please also refrain from...
  28. [VOTE FINISHED: PASSED: IMPLEMENTED] Re: [AWARD] Withwnar for Legio 501st Modder (Gold)

    So, according to the failed abolition poll, I think we can continue here.

    Are the previous supporters still in support of Withwnar?
  29. Replies
    135
    Views
    3,415

    [VOTE FINISHED: FAILED] Re: [Amendment] Section 3 - Article I

    I agree with most of this, if not all of it.

    As an abendum with regards to off-topic posting. Liable to this paragraph of the ToS is also making off-topic personal references which must not...
  30. Replies
    135
    Views
    3,415

    [VOTE FINISHED: FAILED] Re: [Amendment] Section 3 - Article I

    I am posting here as a citizen. Also I've gone a long way to discuss with you, while you couldn't be arsed to post a reasoning for your proposal in the first place. Then you avoided answering...
  31. Replies
    135
    Views
    3,415

    [VOTE FINISHED: FAILED] Re: [Amendment] Section 3 - Article I

    Akar, you have also as of yet avoided to answer this question


    Would you be so kind as to provide an answer? Thank-you.
  32. Replies
    135
    Views
    3,415

    [VOTE FINISHED: FAILED] Re: [Amendment] Section 3 - Article I

    Except, it is not. Lets leave simple courtesy which would expect an interlocutor to reply to a question with an answer aside. You seem to have forgotten, that you are the proposer here. Hence the...
  33. Replies
    135
    Views
    3,415

    [VOTE FINISHED: FAILED] Re: [Amendment] Section 3 - Article I

    If that's not what you're meant with:
    what did you then mean by saying this?


    Replying to a question with a question is not answering the original question but evading it. Are you interested...
  34. Replies
    135
    Views
    3,415

    [VOTE FINISHED: FAILED] Re: [Amendment] Section 3 - Article I

    I don't argue in favor of referrals, in the contrary. And using, like you do, an already overcome system for comparisson to the OP is dishonest, since you have to compare the Status Quo with the...
  35. Replies
    135
    Views
    3,415

    [VOTE FINISHED: FAILED] Re: [Amendment] Section 3 - Article I

    Only because of the inherrent bias of the system in as much as that there was no objectivity with regards to councilor discretion concerning penalties.

    However your proposal would soften up the...
  36. Replies
    135
    Views
    3,415

    [VOTE FINISHED: FAILED] Re: [Amendment] Section 3 - Article I

    That is only half the story. Before that there were referrals. Which was a way more biased system.
    Muizer is absolutely correct with his factual true statement.
  37. Replies
    135
    Views
    3,415

    [VOTE FINISHED: FAILED] Re: [Amendment] Section 3 - Article I

    It is part of that very topic because both, the qualification for citizenship and keeping ones moderation history free of infraction aim at the same goal: citizen conduct. If you make a rule that in...
  38. Replies
    135
    Views
    3,415

    [VOTE FINISHED: FAILED] Re: [Amendment] Section 3 - Article I

    To qualify for citizenship one has to have gone through 6 months without an infraction. Why should one has to abide by the rules for 6 months to qualify, but when qualified and awarded, one would be...
  39. Replies
    135
    Views
    3,415

    [VOTE FINISHED: FAILED] Re: [Amendment] Section 3 - Article I

    Could we please be provided with a reasoning of the OP why he thinks this should be changed.

    Thank-you.
  40. Replies
    7,721
    Views
    1,104,402

    Sticky: Re: Townhall - Curial Commentary and Chat

    Because there are reasons for that period of time and it's not about efficiency. Also, usually Divus nominations are done by either an active HEX or a Divus. And there are reasons for that too.
Results 1 to 40 of 500
Page 1 of 13 1 2 3 4