last image is voltage source, current source and ideal source. second image: Like Sept I don't know the show. First image I can't work with either. I'm Scandinavian.
Type: Posts; User: Cookiegod; Keyword(s):
last image is voltage source, current source and ideal source. second image: Like Sept I don't know the show. First image I can't work with either. I'm Scandinavian.
Here have mine as well
https://i.imgur.com/UXG20aC.png
Or vinegar, if you wait long enough.
The Romanian. He'd never deceive you
Phew. Close call. I'm glad you made it.
https://i.imgur.com/GU2LOKf.png
https://i.imgur.com/GDPWXp3.png
Oh great, so you have discovered google, and you have realised that non-determinism depends on context. You also realise that non-determinism is a word that is frequent in use enough to, according to...
You know guys, let's just for fun look at a link provided not by me, but by Adrian:
https://i.imgur.com/PBxBj9a.png
Ouch. Non-determinism that isn't about quantum theory?! WHAAAAT?! OMG! THAT...
The fact that you're using a nonstandard definition is proven by the fact that you're claiming that calculators are intelligent. In spite of your bad faith attempt at evading any falsifiability of...
I have you covered:
There's absolutely no cogent argument I can see, nor have seen you made, that'd exclude abaci while simultaneously include the most primitive setup of a few AND+XOR...
lol are you now going to hide behind the fact that you kept running every time I asked you to elaborate on your definition? :rofls:
There's absolutely no cogent argument I can see, nor have...
lol what?! Apart from your interpretations differing wildly from standard use of the English language (like since the very start with your nonstandard definition of "intelligence"), what I argue...
first use of the term non-determinism is #88. And oh look:
Oh wow, so unclearly phrased, so easy to misunderstand. Much wow.
Previous mentions did reference deterministic as the counterpart, but...
I'm not a neuroscientist, I'm an engineer, and I can handle that term just fine. I do not see the logic in your claims still. You're still arguing as if the brain is in control of the randomness,...
If I understand you correctly, you're making the claim that this is not a randomness from the perspective of the brain, and that it's only us that are unable to model it correctly. If that is your...
For one, I'm not defensive, I'm annoyed. Not even particularly at anyone in this debate here, nor do I generally have a problem with wishful thinking. I have a problem with wishful thinking...
I challenge you to go ahead, use the search tool, and find the sentences where I used non-determinism. I was very clear. The moment I was misunderstood (free will, quantum theory), which quite...
Who is we in that context? I don't see it that way and I don't see the reasoning behind that argument. Why ignore that which is at the core of its function and a key difference to computers? Are...
I don't understand your question. Rephrase it please.
I went through most of them point by point rofl, you failed to address pretty much all the counter points. After claiming that abaci weren't intelligent, you switched to saying that mechanised were....
And you'll remain well outside any position to ask me to provide anything until the very unlikely event that you're going to do any of the very basic things requested from you dozens of times.
...
Bwahahaha. The guy who still adamantly refuses to elaborate on his definition of intelligence, refuses to explain the contradiction inherent to the tidbits of his definition given, the guy who not...
Except a plethora of papers and scientific consensus.
You seem confused about the topic of the conversation. Hint: It's not about quantum theory. There's absolutely no point whatsoever to debate e.g. the Many Worlds Interpretation (highly debatable that...
No.
For one determinism in the context I'm speaking here:
Not once did I speak of determinism here in the context of free will. It is up to you if you want to sum all the outside and inside...
Clarification: I wasn't arguing free will, that's an entirely different can of worms.
Because it's a fact. E.g. Kunihiko Kaneko, "From globally coupled maps to complex-systems biology", Chaos 25,...
I never argued from a metaphysical or magical angle. I always and consistently argued the following points:
1) There's a very significant gap between how AI works and what people think AI is.
2)...
I accept your surrender.
I'm not artificial, cope. I'm 100% organic gluten-free dough. Also I invented cheese on toast, so sit down.
Your claim of "no real connection" stems from the absense of an actual counterargument on your part, along with a lack of clarity of what your claim is to begin with.
And that's quite the crux of...
I'm gonna go ahead and simply say no.
You do realise humanity did not invent the laws of electricity, just like gravity they've been around since the big bang. How do you distinguish between a...
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL.
Calculators and computers in general work deterministic, brains on the other hand do a statistical assessment, and when doing a task repeatedly, it does not reproduce the exact...
you refuse to address anything other than the picture
you refuse to address the picture in a way that would help your case. E.g. how come that a calculator in your mind represents intelligence, but...
A calculator is literally just a sequence of AND and XOR logic gates. You can quite literally build one out of domino bricks or with water.
Or behold: Medieval Artificial Intelligence!...
We're in an empasse partly because an severe lack of understanding how e.g. calculators work, what e.g. KAIROS is intended as, and what intelligence is defined as. I quite simply couldn't respond...
please elaborate
Thing is though that the example you gave makes no more of a decision than others. It has a desired output and the machine learning algorithm tries to predict and choose the option that will get it...
I was typing a response and then I realised I was just going to repeat myself yet again. Try maybe defining what sentience is to you first. The way I see it there are two angles to it, I argued...
I adressed that in the longer post which you didn't read. For one, it's more reductionist than is warranted. Secondly, this nihilistic view is not what either Blake Lemoine nor most other people...
We do care to know, and us being unable to look into the models is a huge issue for many reasons, including security reasons. There's a lot of research going on and with limited success in trying to...
I'll quote myself: AI is training to predict outcome y based on input x. Nothing more, nothing less. It has no understanding what x or y is. It is purely mathematical. So no, sentience wouldn't...