Search:

Type: Posts; User: Gigantus; Keyword(s):

Page 1 of 13 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.40 seconds.

  1. Replies
    2,565
    Views
    454,669

    Sticky: Re: 'You Laugh, You Lose Thread (No Videos, Read OP)

    .
    .

    "Do you wish to loose weight?"
    "Jo"
    "Would you like desert?"
    "Jo"
    Explaining the jojo effect has never been easier.
  2. Re: [Discussion] The purpose of "oppose" in amendments and decisions

    Yeah, I am with the self assessment. Impractical, pre vote etc. And general participation levels could mean that increasing the required 'support' level simply kills the baby in the crib.

    Totally...
  3. Sticky: Re: [Election-X-2021] Magistrate Debate Thread

    [insert demonic, reciprocal laughter here]
  4. Replies
    6,463
    Views
    837,048

    Re: SSHIP - General Discussion

    Still got hidden resource slots available? Make it region & faction conditional. (byzantium and hidden_resource pavedroad)
  5. Re: Added New Culture but no music plays for it

    One is glad to be of service :buba:
  6. Replies
    48
    Views
    592

    Re: [Amendment] Section III, Article I

    Having received a reasoning from administration for the pre-existing SND issues in this case and the amendment not changing the origin\cause of these pre-existing issues herewith now the hopefully...
  7. Replies
    11
    Views
    177

    Re: The Mysterious New Faction Problem

    One is glad to be of service :buba:
  8. Replies
    48
    Views
    592

    Re: [Amendment] Section III, Article I

    Yup, they rather point out why it is deemed permissible in this very restricted and defined circumstance, your observation in brackets seems to sum it up although it misses another 'inevitable'...
  9. Replies
    11
    Views
    177

    Re: The Mysterious New Faction Problem

    Well, I suppose it is taken as given as there can only be 31 factions and each faction can have only one entry per agent. Duplicates are usually a sign of disrupted\discontinued work, eg preparation...
  10. Replies
    54
    Views
    816

    Re: Decision: Elected Moderators

    I have my doubt dealing with the fall out from the rejection of a publicly vetted and voted for candidate that gets rejected will improve anything other then the circus rating. Reasoning will be...
  11. Replies
    48
    Views
    592

    Re: [Amendment] Section III, Article I

    See Iskar's comment. And the term 'technically' by Abduel.
  12. Re: [Decision] Move the TWC Milestone Award thread out of the Symposium

    Never mind the matter of subscription and to an extent, reference.
  13. Replies
    48
    Views
    592

    Re: [Amendment] Section III, Article I

    Says so in the quote I posted, although it's not a matter of being expanded, the praetorium angle already exists since the 'revoke' wording established it's involvement. As he points out. Same breach...
  14. Replies
    48
    Views
    592

    Re: [Amendment] Section III, Article I

    Extensive rewrite it is then - hopefully won't take too long. I have amended the 'proposal' section in the OP in the meantime and spoilered the last 'discussion' version.
  15. Re: [DECISION] Move the TWC Milestone Award thread from out of the Symposium

    Another milestone in the award's history, let's roll the stone! Support.
  16. Re: [Decision] Creating a Curia Banner (and Logo)

    No rest for the wicked - support.
  17. Sticky: Re: Full install for Stainless Steel 6.4, Meloo Fix, Steam compatible

    Meloo's fix is still available here on TWC - it's the one I used in this repack.

    Doing a mix and match of 'fixes' is most likely going to lead to crashes as some of the files are not common to all...
  18. Replies
    54
    Views
    816

    Re: Decision: Elected Moderators

    Ok, so the curia votes whether a member is 'qualified'. And then moderation takes over and apply their own vetting process (from scratch obviously) of which the 'qualification' that is being voted on...
  19. Replies
    526
    Views
    70,549

    Sticky: Re: {DIK} Bugs & Problems

    Glad to hear it's solved. Enjoy it with your friends.
  20. Replies
    2,565
    Views
    454,669

    Sticky: Re: 'You Laugh, You Lose Thread (No Videos, Read OP)

    .
    .

    When women are upset with you
    they give you the silent treatment.
    That's a reward, isn't it?
  21. Thread: The Expanse

    by Gigantus
    Replies
    235
    Views
    49,538

    Re: The Expanse

    I think I really need start reading the books - not sure how I missed them. Movies, especially SF, simply can't convey the intricacies a book relies and is build upon - no negativity as such...
  22. Re: Added New Culture but no music plays for it

    Did you delete the events idx and dat files in the mod's data\sounds directory? It's required to enable changes in the text files. If you edited\added actual sound files then you will need to delete...
  23. Re: Is it possible to test when two named characters are in the same army?

    Making it special to specific settlements is an option, maybe just messages? Perhaps along the lines of 'like minded people met in cologne and invented fish & chips' :tongue:

    Never say no to an...
  24. Replies
    526
    Views
    70,549

    Sticky: Re: {DIK} Bugs & Problems

    Thanks for confirming that it was indeed a recruitment script, working as intended but with confusing info.

    As to the second bug - you will have no choice other then to save and reload if you are...
  25. Replies
    54
    Views
    816

    Re: Decision: Elected Moderators

    Re-opposed.
  26. Replies
    54
    Views
    816

    Re: Decision: Elected Moderators

    I will have to rephrase as the comment I had in mind was not made in a public area of TWC: Combine that with curial voting that has proven to be based mostly on anything other then the criteria of...
  27. Replies
    48
    Views
    592

    Re: [Amendment] Section III, Article I

    Feed back - I think we have untangled the issue far enough that it shouldn't be a procedural issue (over complex, cross wires) for the consul anymore, please ignore the request.
  28. Replies
    281
    Views
    65,649

    Re: The Last Kingdom (Fourth Season Out)

    No news yet.
  29. Replies
    48
    Views
    592

    Re: [Amendment] Section III, Article I

    Well, I am going to wait for a bit if I can get a conclusive response regarding this and then take it from there - doing the 'consul does the tracking' rewrite would be fairly extensive anyhow as I...
  30. Replies
    11
    Views
    177

    Re: The Mysterious New Faction Problem

    The duke's and mine, see OP.
  31. Replies
    48
    Views
    592

    Re: [Amendment] Section III, Article I

    1. Noted - this could be achieved by simply notifying the consul on day one of the infraction and keeping the rest of the procedure as is. A 'codification' would make sense here as otherwise a total...
  32. Replies
    48
    Views
    592

    Re: [Amendment] Section III, Article I

    The post phoning is not with concern over foot notes per se but rather with the somewhat pivotal issue if moderation would release praetorium info in the form required. If not then it would have a...
  33. Replies
    11
    Views
    177

    Re: The Mysterious New Faction Problem

    Technically you should be able to start a campaign if you only add a 'franks' entry in descr_characters for named character (clone an entry and then clone a faction line for the strat model in...
  34. Re: [Discussion] An idea to improve modding awards distribution

    Let me see if I understood right: creators of mods\tutorials\resources as well as users thereof are encouraged (through banners and other means) to provide details (creator\creations) which then will...
  35. Replies
    48
    Views
    592

    Re: [Amendment] Section III, Article I

    Appreciate the support. While it would allow me to push the proposal as it is right now without further ado I would like to first receive a feed back from moderation with regards to the Praetorium...
  36. Replies
    48
    Views
    592

    Re: [Amendment] Section III, Article I

    Please specify what you mean with 'yet to receive an explanation...' or what the relevance is for this case as this is the first time you raise the issue.

    1 and 2 is already in place\practice....
  37. Replies
    48
    Views
    592

    Re: [Amendment] Section III, Article I

    It's been several days without further input - please move to vote.
  38. Replies
    18
    Views
    472

    [MOVED TO VOTE] Re: [Decision] Opifex artwork update

    Bit late, but anyhow - with the option of voting for the original this has my support.
  39. Replies
    54
    Views
    816

    Re: Decision: Elected Moderators

    Every Citizen who meets the qualifications, you mean.[/QUOTE]

    It's re-assuring that you know what eligible means (or not?). That's exactly what was meant.

    Aka the qualifications will include...
  40. Replies
    121
    Views
    7,091

    Re: Dune 2020 by Villeneuve has finished filming

    Had to look twice because of no beard :tongue: - watched another episode of 'see' just before it.
Results 1 to 40 of 500
Page 1 of 13 1 2 3 4