The sad part is a Nazi rant is probably equal in retardation to a liberal rant. One wants ethnic genocide, the other wants special fire hydrants for transgender dogs.
Type: Posts; User: Szlachta; Keyword(s):
The sad part is a Nazi rant is probably equal in retardation to a liberal rant. One wants ethnic genocide, the other wants special fire hydrants for transgender dogs.
I'm not sure what's more hilarious, butthurt snowflakes still whining about Trump, or the fact that half the butthurt snowflakes are not even American.
As if us Americans give two :wub: about...
Is development for this mod dead? Love the Empire Total War ACW mod and its unit diversity. Was wondering if we were getting anymore units for this version of the mod?
Damn, he got banned.
Gorgon is right, the game's not really that bad.
You seem to like Rome II, considering you have more time in it than every other Steam Era TW in your list combined.
I doubt Prith has played Rome II. Let's see some credentials there, pal.
206 hours in Rome II (thought it was 306, hmm), and I play on VH or Legendary depending on the mood. Fail less before you assume. Also, learn how to read, it's obvious you didn't understand/read half...
Good reply, Sup.
1. They do, learn how to play/use formations.
2. It's part of the charge mechanic for balancing so every unit doesn't have skirmish abilities
3. It's called an abstraction, Rome I as well as...
Math has already proven you wrong, get over it. To go through it again, Rome II has more: More maps, units, factions, diplomacy options, agents and agent actions, techs, buildings, abilities, battle...
Considering we barely lost anything, I'd say no, there's way more diversity and depth to that diversity. I also find it funny that most of the things in OP's list are either so insignificant that...
Actually, it's a mathematical fact that Rome II has more content. More maps, units, factions, diplomacy options, agents and agent actions, techs, buildings, abilities, battle types, resources,...
It's on par with Shogun II's is what I'm saying, so there's nothing to whine about. All TW games are easy, Rome II is no easier than any other TW. Learn to read.
Learn more about Rome II then. 7...
Nope, just sounds like another whiner that hasn't played the game in months.
The game's AI is no dumber than any previous TW's, so yeah, you have no argument. So, again, go back to the 3rd, where...
Nothing you said made any sense. Learn more about logic? It's the same dumb AI as before. Rome II is just as easy as every other TW game. So yeah, looks like just another bandwagon whiner that...
No, I'm saying go back to when your rant would have mattered. 7 patches have fixed most problems. This thread is about as relevant as posting the Angry Joe review, which is to say it isn't.
Then they can go play Rome I, or take off their nostalgia goggles. But again, who cares what Rome I had, the majority of people that bought Rome II don't even come to forums, so it's not like your...
Yep, bring back all the cut content.
I've played my PC in my living room for over 20 years. Learn more about gaming before making ignorant comments.
Meh, who cares what Rome I had. Rome II has more content and diversity than any other TW ever made.
...Go back to September 3rd, OP.
LOL at people that try to use ignorance as an argument. Just because you don't know enough about the units and their uses/differences, doesn't mean the people that have actually been playing don't....
Can you link pics that I can actually see? Also, you made no point. You just spouted ignorance that's super easy for simple math to refute.
So you haven't actually played either game. Got...
I was talking 1:1 ratio (what else would give an objective result?). And in 1:1 the early naval ships will own any transport navy. Though it doesn't have to be 1:1, as I've taken out plenty of...
Yes, people actually have the nerve to say this. It makes me wonder if they've ever played a Total War game. And pretty much tells me that they are just here to complain about any random thing that...
What the :wub: is up with all this wrong information spouted about this game. It's like the people that thought every land battle had flag capture points.
Er, early navy ships crush any Era transport army. Seriously, have you guys even played this game?
Because they don't do a better job than navies, not even early dedicated naval units.
Don't need to. Transports have always been an abstraction in TW. At least now the representation IS more...
Transports get owned by navies. Again, people should learn more about the game before replying. You're mad that 20 transport units killed 3 puny ships. Yeah, nothing wrong with that. They get owned...
No, but a lot of Iceni look like Guy Fieri. Anyway, it's a mathematical fact that there's more diversity in Rome II than any other TW (and not just in units, but the map, abilities, bonuses and...
You're butthurt that you lost a battle. Get over it. Yeah, there's nothing wrong with transports.
Sorry, but simple math has already proven you wrong. More units, more abilities than any other Total War. Hilarious how you can't even form an argument, other than trying to redefine how math works....
My answer was to move your capital. Try reading.
Just because you're not any good at the game doesn't mean everybody else sucks too.
It's a known fact Rome II has more diversity and content. Learn more about simple numbers before replying, cevap.
Was that to me? I mean, I figure it is since I'm the only one in this thread that likes the game.
As for an answer, how could anybody know that? Sega set the deadline, we don't know what Rome II...
You'll be waiting a while then as they said the next TW was not going to be a third of any title.
Should be in your siege tree. Different for almost every faction, so I can't give you the exact tech, since I don't know your exact faction.
Yeah, we've all known this. Again, suck less at the game and learn how to whine. You're doing it wrong.