Search:

delete

delete

Seems like pretty balanced analysis to me.

Called it.

Also interesting. A much more compelling performance than the race grifters did.

Not really. The Court has been set at nine members for the past 150 years except for that one time a democrat wasn't getting his way and appointed more.

Diet coke is :wub:ing delicious.

I have no idea what the outcome is going to be

Pretty much yes, not sure it was Mercil or the other guy though.

Any time I'm in public at least half the masks I see being worn are totally filthy. It's disgusting to see

The state's own witness on use of force testified that he has done exactly what Chauvin did on at least one occasion and it did not result in death. Reasonable doubt is piling up. It is raining...

As a preliminary matter, I find your position to be facially racist. How dare you only care about white businesses and houses impacted by the violence, rioting, and lynching perpetrated by the BLM...

Racially discriminatory legislation? Well that's A-ok as long as it favors minorities, right? Oh how short sighted most journalists are. They are gleeful that whites will be the minority in the US by...

That is an interesting and totally incorrect explanation of how the burden of proof works.

So, what do I get if you're wrong?

I know what it doesn't say - Derek Chauvin. The state has the burden, and so far they're not doing a great job. I understand that you're very upset that the a priori arguments and preferred trial...

You wouldn't know - you're not a lawyer. What a lawyer would tell you is that a conviction must be sustained by a unanimous jury decision which finds guilt beyond any reasonable doubt. Not even the...

Election integrity is sort of important.

If the MLB thinks it is a woke and progressive thing to do to move their sports ball game from a 51% black city (to one with a 10% black population) where...

Again, I guess you missed the opening arguments. I can't engage with you so long as you're going to like, intentionally be wrong. There's nothing to debate. But as usual you're missing the forest for...

Someone must have missed the opening arguments, and then all the testimony after that. :laughter:

I could make a joke, but I'll resist the urge.

I should have anticipated you would just ignore any evidence damaging to your pre-conceived trial, conviction, and execution of Chauvin. Johnny Mercil.

Now that the planets have aligned, maybe...

Trans day of visibility is transphobic since it implies every other day is trans day of invisibility. Tear it down, pack it up.

"He was tolerant to 3x the lethal dose."

Yeah, ok.

No.

Stop pretending people are passing out in line because they don't have food or water. Stop pretending voters, especially minority voters, are too stupid to bring their own food or water. Stop...

Who would win:

Some malnourished farmers in southeast Asia or the US military?

Some goat herders with scraggly beards who hate cartoons or the US miltiary?

The entire might of the British...

^ The defense should move for a directed verdict based on that testimony and especially if the state cannot establish the fact that Chauvin's knee was on Floyd's neck. The entire theory of th ecase...

0% of it is hidden, though I understand that your best tactic here is to make this all sound conspiratorial. Unfortunately for you, BLM has been saying the quiet part out loud for months now.

So no evidence, imagine my surprise...:spambash:

Yesss, his black cowl, very intimidating.

edit - wow, having just read this thread in its entirety: is there an interest in some brief summaries being posted after every session?

What legal reasons?

Let's not make this about me at the expense of the evidence and facts. I'd hate to see your argument jump down the rabbit hole of personal references.

I accept your semantic surrender.

I'll defer to your expertise and experience in the Minnesota Court of Appeals, lol.

Your misunderstanding that judges act as fact finders instead of juries in the United States tells me all I...

Sell me, prove Trump is racist using his own words or actions.

Well, "for you" maybe, but this is again objectively wrong as you have naively oversimplified not only the very definition of the bill of rights, but the legal issues at hand related to government...

And just like that, you're banned from twitter.

In my experience some juries are immune to evidence. We'll see what happens.

What did the toxicology report say? Deflect all you want, the overwhelming evidence and testimony at this point in the trial shows that George Floyd killed George Floyd. I hope these facts won't...

I direct you to the 10th amendment. I further demonstrate that the 2nd and 10th amendments are separate. If you fail to appreciate these implications, I could spell it out - but I doubt it would help.