I would prefer not to give scores at all Actually, that's a much better idea.
I suspect that the problem with fergusmck's call for interviewees is that none of us can be absolutely sure we are "distinguished" enough. Personally, I would of course be more than happy to wax lyrical about my awesomeness for considerably longer than the required 15 minutes (despite consistent failure in recent TotWs). Are there any other takers?
Nah, it's yours. "Juvemann, geh du voran! Du hast die größten Stiefel an....."
I am provisionally taking that as a compliment (since idiom doesn't survive the ministrations of on-line translators). But I fear a better explanation is... Ich habe den größten Kopf!
"Das Llama hat zumindest das größte Mundwerk..." Ohhhoooo burn~~
I think it would be much more fun for LlamaD to do the interview, Fergus could then publish it as a competition with a prize for the first person to decipher it correctly.
I bet nobody can answer.....
There's a failsafe protection at the "distinguished" requirement. And censorship last time didn't help, too. Like in good ol' "Pirates!" from Sid Meier, infamous is the preferred surname given, is'n it? Tough luck 4 Ju. Back to reviewing.
Read my new AAR : Liberation of Greece guys!
Ah LlamaD, your first case! Go Go Go | | | \/
There's no case, since i'm not Matlock. Spoiler Alert, click show to read: Don't read on if you're not Mollsomg. Spoiler Alert, click show to read: Hi friend... Spoiler Alert, click show to read: You're an rotten, evil, disobeying, nosy skunk. Spoiler Alert, click show to read: And Mollsomg aint that much better Click to view content: It was neither a Statusmessage nor did J. meant it [in a way] for me to interview AARtists. After all, this should be a positive thing for the interviewees, right...? Imperative Molly, imperative. -> Team, fall back to reviewing. Nice try though, you . Btw, be careful that you don't get interviewed next for your abominal crimes against HumanAARty. You'd be lucky if they take Musthavestache first. Anyways, there are some somewhat older aars worthy waiting to be looked at. Among others, ofc.
Juvenal, I like your latest update.
yeah all the other ones were awful Spoiler Alert, click show to read: lolollolol that one was good eh
Spoiler Alert, click show to read: I declare a spoiler war! Spoiler Alert, click show to read: And I don't even care if that's not a proper term! Spoiler Alert, click show to read: It is now! Spoiler Alert, click show to read: Persistant arn't ya?
@Legio Caesar - thanks very much, it was also something of a relief to finally get it posted. Unfortunately I don't think everyone understood it completely, so I am probably going to have to post a clarification of some things I thought didn't need to be spelt out (i.e. who Ce Morbet was working for, and who ordered the assassination).
Sometimes it's hard to understand the subtle messages.
I'm going to come back to my persia one as soon as ca patches etw again. I'm doing my m2tw guide just putting the finshing tocuhes on it to post
And I'll be doing a Hungarian one as soon as my current AAR is complete
I think I'll try a Crusader state one after my Sicilian one. Anyone got any tips?
I've read some Templar AARs and what I specifically liked about them was that they always supported the Christian states in the area and were very anti-Islamic. I like a historical AAR with the Crusaders or you could go mental with them like Babagitta did but I personally like it if you use the descr_strat file, give the Egyptians and Turks and perhaps Kwarezmians some extra cash and troops while you decrease your own forces. This should give you a very realistic AAR
