should the Lakhmids and Ghassanids remain as playable factions or be made an unplayable factions with small rosters?

Chinggis Khan · Chinggis Khan

I am unsure whether the Lakhmids and Ghassanids should be unplayable or playable

Jwb187 · Jwb187

They should be unplayable cause they are less interesting and less important than many other important factions on the game

also they are hard to find info about

Drtad · Drtad

Unless some interesting info pops up about their military, I am unsure whether they deserve a full slot.

Eranshahr · Eranshahr

They should be playable:

If the thing is about the modellers work, which i respect a lot. What will the difference be? I mean, give them a small rooster which was I my suggestion in teh beginning. the modeller has to create the small rooster. And then why not making it playable? otherwise his work will go lost in teh unknown world

2nd it is fun to play as a faction that is locked between three greater powers, maybe leading you to become the great arab power instead of the Rashdiuns. Kind of like playing Milan or Sicily in vanilla, which is really fun.

3rd lack of pictures? I poster some proposed units in teh Ghassanid thread yesterday with some pictures. remember that most of their units will look pretty arab-byzantine/persian

They should be playable, because making factions unplayable is just letting lose of something great and something that will create a good feeling.

But yes people are the deciders, if you are sure you enver want to play as these factions, vote no. If you want to test these and get the great feeling of playing as christian arabs. Vote yes!

Jwb187 · Jwb187

well it would be fun to play as christian arabs but these people are just not made to be playable

jo the greek · jo the greek

it would be interesting to have a mix in those region not only three states
but if is it difficult to represent them better to be like territorial troops for the byzantines and sassanids.
but i wouldnt like to see ghassanids fighting byzantines.

Qarama · Qarama

yes= playable?
no= unplayable?

Eranshahr · Eranshahr

yes!

firekiller · firekiller

well then i voted wrong i voted NO but i want to play em

Eranshahr · Eranshahr

So it is 3-3!
Not 4-2

firekiller · firekiller

yes i voted they should be playebel pretty confusion in that quistion perhaps moddify it

Hulagu Khan · Hulagu Khan

NO

Eranshahr · Eranshahr

4-3 it is

Shadowcry · Shadowcry

What does yes mean?

~~Miraj~~ · ~~Miraj~~

TIP: You can't give a yes/no answer to a question that asks "X or Y".

mastaace · mastaace

that was my thought as well...

Chinggis Khan · Chinggis Khan

okay basically it means do you want Lakhmids and Ghassanids playable or unplayable?

Qarama · Qarama

unplayable
this is why i have posted for NO

nnnm · nnnm

No. they can be mres for Sassanids and Eastern Roman E

Eranshahr · Eranshahr

well now it is 6-6

remember somebody mistakenly voted no but meant yes.

I don't understand the fun of having them unplayable? the modellers will still have to model all units they need. And the coders will write down as much as original.
the players will suffer the most. How many of you don't want to play as Mongols or Papal state in MTW2 vanilla? it will be the same here. Besides these will be the absolute last factions to be created.

View Poll Results: should the Lakhmids and Ghassanids remain as playable factions or be made an unplayable factions with small rosters?
yes	6	30.00%
no	9	45.00%
unsure	5	25.00%
Voters: 20. You may not vote on this poll

Chinggis Khan	September 23, 2007, 12:07 PM / should the Lakhmids and Ghassanids remain as playable factions or be made an unplayable factions with small rosters?	#1
In lulz we trust. Posts: 7,031 Total Awards: 2	I am unsure whether the Lakhmids and Ghassanids should be unplayable or playable check out my brand new blog here

Jwb187	September 23, 2007, 12:09 PM / Re: should the Lakhmids and Ghassanids remain as playable factions or be made an unplayable factions with small rosters?	#2
Colour Sergeant Posts: 465	They should be unplayable cause they are less interesting and less important than many other important factions on the game also they are hard to find info about

Drtad	September 23, 2007, 12:11 PM / Re: should the Lakhmids and Ghassanids remain as playable factions or be made an unplayable factions with small rosters?	#3
It Stinks!!! Posts: 3,396 Total Awards: 1	Unless some interesting info pops up about their military, I am unsure whether they deserve a full slot. The Fall of Armenia: Chapter 1 Chapter 2 Chapter 3 Chapter 4 Chapter 5 Chapter 6 Chapter 7 Chapter 8 Under the patronage of the honourable basileus John I Tzimisces Patron of King Arsen Keeper of the FAITH

Eranshahr	September 23, 2007, 12:14 PM / Re: should the Lakhmids and Ghassanids remain as playable factions or be made an unplayable factions with small rosters?	#4
Colonel Posts: 3,408	They should be playable: If the thing is about the modellers work, which i respect a lot. What will the difference be? I mean, give them a small rooster which was I my suggestion in teh beginning. the modeller has to create the small rooster. And then why not making it playable? otherwise his work will go lost in teh unknown world 2nd it is fun to play as a faction that is locked between three greater powers, maybe leading you to become the great arab power instead of the Rashdiuns. Kind of like playing Milan or Sicily in vanilla, which is really fun. 3rd lack of pictures? I poster some proposed units in teh Ghassanid thread yesterday with some pictures. remember that most of their units will look pretty arab-byzantine/persian They should be playable, because making factions unplayable is just letting lose of something great and something that will create a good feeling. But yes people are the deciders, if you are sure you enver want to play as these factions, vote no. If you want to test these and get the great feeling of playing as christian arabs. Vote yes! Independence, freedom, Aryan republic! Socialism, Feminism, Anti-Rascism! It is the structures of Capitalism who make the class, race and gender struggles neccesary. I personally refuse to accept that I will have approximately 17% less money each month because I am Middle Eastern, I refuse to accept that if a girl is raped the rapist blames it on her clothing, and I refuse to accept that the working class is the slave of the modern society- thats why I believe in Socialism, thats why call myself a Feminist and thats why I am Anti-rascist.

Jwb187	September 23, 2007, 12:16 PM / Re: should the Lakhmids and Ghassanids remain as playable factions or be made an unplayable factions with small rosters?	#5
Colour Sergeant Posts: 465	well it would be fun to play as christian arabs but these people are just not made to be playable

jo the greek	September 23, 2007, 12:47 PM / Re: should the Lakhmids and Ghassanids remain as playable factions or be made an unplayable factions with small rosters?	#6
Lieutenant Colonel Posts: 2,840	it would be interesting to have a mix in those region not only three states but if is it difficult to represent them better to be like territorial troops for the byzantines and sassanids. but i wouldnt like to see ghassanids fighting byzantines. Empire total war or ???

Qarama	September 23, 2007, 06:00 PM / Re: should the Lakhmids and Ghassanids remain as playable factions or be made an unplayable factions with small rosters?	#7
Drum Major Posts: 501	yes= playable? no= unplayable?

Eranshahr	September 23, 2007, 06:02 PM / Re: should the Lakhmids and Ghassanids remain as playable factions or be made an unplayable factions with small rosters?	#8
Colonel Posts: 3,408	yes! Independence, freedom, Aryan republic! Socialism, Feminism, Anti-Rascism! It is the structures of Capitalism who make the class, race and gender struggles neccesary. I personally refuse to accept that I will have approximately 17% less money each month because I am Middle Eastern, I refuse to accept that if a girl is raped the rapist blames it on her clothing, and I refuse to accept that the working class is the slave of the modern society- thats why I believe in Socialism, thats why call myself a Feminist and thats why I am Anti-rascist.

firekiller	September 24, 2007, 09:13 AM / Re: should the Lakhmids and Ghassanids remain as playable factions or be made an unplayable factions with small rosters?	#9
Subaltern Posts: 1,431	well then i voted wrong i voted NO but i want to play em _______________________________ My words become true in a battle Member: The Frontier, The Great Conflics

Eranshahr	September 24, 2007, 10:47 AM / Re: should the Lakhmids and Ghassanids remain as playable factions or be made an unplayable factions with small rosters?	#10
Colonel Posts: 3,408	So it is 3-3! Not 4-2 Independence, freedom, Aryan republic! Socialism, Feminism, Anti-Rascism! It is the structures of Capitalism who make the class, race and gender struggles neccesary. I personally refuse to accept that I will have approximately 17% less money each month because I am Middle Eastern, I refuse to accept that if a girl is raped the rapist blames it on her clothing, and I refuse to accept that the working class is the slave of the modern society- thats why I believe in Socialism, thats why call myself a Feminist and thats why I am Anti-rascist.

firekiller	September 24, 2007, 02:00 PM / Re: should the Lakhmids and Ghassanids remain as playable factions or be made an unplayable factions with small rosters?	#11
Subaltern Posts: 1,431	yes i voted they should be playebel pretty confusion in that quistion perhaps moddify it _______________________________ My words become true in a battle Member: The Frontier, The Great Conflics

Hulagu Khan	September 25, 2007, 04:46 AM / Re: should the Lakhmids and Ghassanids remain as playable factions or be made an unplayable factions with small rosters?	#12
Grenadier Posts: 74	NO

Eranshahr	September 25, 2007, 11:23 AM / Re: should the Lakhmids and Ghassanids remain as playable factions or be made an unplayable factions with small rosters?	#13
Colonel Posts: 3,408	4-3 it is Independence, freedom, Aryan republic! Socialism, Feminism, Anti-Rascism! It is the structures of Capitalism who make the class, race and gender struggles neccesary. I personally refuse to accept that I will have approximately 17% less money each month because I am Middle Eastern, I refuse to accept that if a girl is raped the rapist blames it on her clothing, and I refuse to accept that the working class is the slave of the modern society- thats why I believe in Socialism, thats why call myself a Feminist and thats why I am Anti-rascist.

Shadowcry	September 26, 2007, 11:15 PM / Re: should the Lakhmids and Ghassanids remain as playable factions or be made an unplayable factions with small rosters?	#14
Sergeant Major Posts: 982	What does yes mean?

~~Miraj~~	September 26, 2007, 11:55 PM / Re: should the Lakhmids and Ghassanids remain as playable factions or be made an unplayable factions with small rosters?	#15
Indefinitely Banned Posts: 14,258 Total Awards: 2	TIP: You can't give a yes/no answer to a question that asks "X or Y".

mastaace	September 27, 2007, 10:07 AM / Re: should the Lakhmids and Ghassanids remain as playable factions or be made an unplayable factions with small rosters?	#16
Armoury Sergeant Posts: 606	that was my thought as well...

Chinggis Khan	September 27, 2007, 11:14 AM / Re: should the Lakhmids and Ghassanids remain as playable factions or be made an unplayable factions with small rosters?	#17
In lulz we trust. Posts: 7,031 Total Awards: 2	okay basically it means do you want Lakhmids and Ghassanids playable or unplayable? check out my brand new blog here

Qarama	September 27, 2007, 06:46 PM / Re: should the Lakhmids and Ghassanids remain as playable factions or be made an unplayable factions with small rosters?	#18
Drum Major Posts: 501	unplayable this is why i have posted for NO

nnnm	September 28, 2007, 09:14 PM / Re: should the Lakhmids and Ghassanids remain as playable factions or be made an unplayable factions with small rosters?	#19
Sergeant Major Posts: 919	No. they can be mres for Sassanids and Eastern Roman E ---- Muhammad (PBUH) ----

Eranshahr	September 28, 2007, 09:26 PM / Re: should the Lakhmids and Ghassanids remain as playable factions or be made an unplayable factions with small rosters?	#20
Colonel Posts: 3,408	well now it is 6-6 remember somebody mistakenly voted no but meant yes. I don't understand the fun of having them unplayable? the modellers will still have to model all units they need. And the coders will write down as much as original. the players will suffer the most. How many of you don't want to play as Mongols or Papal state in MTW2 vanilla? it will be the same here. Besides these will be the absolute last factions to be created. Independence, freedom, Aryan republic! Socialism, Feminism, Anti-Rascism! It is the structures of Capitalism who make the class, race and gender struggles neccesary. I personally refuse to accept that I will have approximately 17% less money each month because I am Middle Eastern, I refuse to accept that if a girl is raped the rapist blames it on her clothing, and I refuse to accept that the working class is the slave of the modern society- thats why I believe in Socialism, thats why call myself a Feminist and thats why I am Anti-rascist.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search