An interesting example of this thinking concerned the issue of black people living in Britain in the ancient times.
An interesting example of this thinking concerned the issue of black people living in Britain in the ancient times.
Going rogue and off-topic in my own thread: no one is refuting that North Africans of the Roman Empire settled in places as far afield as Britannia. At one point there was even a North African Berber governor of Rome's province of Britannia: Quintus Lollius Urbicus
There is little evidence, however, that black sub-Saharan Africans lived in the northern provinces of the empire, let alone the British Isles. We do have depictions of black Africans in roman mosaics from places like Syria, depicting them as fishermen, shepherds, or slaves. Then there's also the sculpted depiction of Memnon, a foster child of the ethnic Greek Roman Senator Herodes Atticus during the reign of Marcus Aurelius. Memnon's features in his bust are clearly sub-Saharan. Yet in all of Roman historiography, there's basically only one reference to an East African, specifically an Ethiopian, in Roman Britain as a soldier stationed there, as mentioned in The Life of Septimius Severus, contained in the Historia Augusta's (written late 4th or early 5th century AD).
It should be emphasized, as well, that this one black Ethiopian guy was seen as an oddity by the emperor Septimius Severus (while stationed in Roman Britain), himself half-Roman and half-Punic (i.e. Semitic Carthaginian) from North Africa:
So, in essence, despite Mary Beard being a credible academic otherwise, on this particular niche subject she has no clue what she's talking about.Originally Posted by Historia Augusta
Last edited by Roma_Victrix; March 15, 2018 at 08:59 AM.
Kingdom of Lindon preview video out
DCI: Last Alliance - WIP Second Age mod | DCI: Tôl Acharn - mighty Dúnedain Counter Invasions |
Additional Mercenary Minimod - more mercs; for TATW and DCI | Family Tree minimods - lore improvements | Remade Event Pictures - enhance cultures trough images |
Favorite TATW compilation: Withwnars Submod Collection
Patron of Mank, Kiliç Alì, FireFreak111, MIKEGOLF & Arachir Galudirithon, Earl of Memory
Y'all really want to see the forum burn, don't you
What's going to be the next peaceful, totally unattached from the modern world point of discussion? Female empowerment throughout the ages? Mass migration from other cultures and it's impacts? The importance of ethnic cohesion on state-building and peace? Penis size and empire development?!
Last edited by Severloh; March 15, 2018 at 03:20 PM.
It's impossible to discuss history without touch some sensible matters. I guess that's the reason the "History" channel stopped with the documentaries and replaced them with aliens and "historical" fantasy stuff. Or maybe there is another reason...?
SO DO YOU!!! THROW HIM OVERBOARD!
Seriously, though, that was good. I died and peed myself before doing so.
I'm not sure if she understands the difference between North Africans and those south of the Sahara, which is odd given her interest in archaeology and ancient peoples.
So here we have an example of someone who actually didn't bother reading the OP. Bravo, sir. Do you know what the thread is actually about? Or are you just responding to my admittedly click-bait title? The purpose of this thread is to discuss artifacts and ARTWORK, while forming comparisons between them as outlined in academic literature. You'd know that, of course, if you read more than two sentences of my thread. Come back to us when you've done that. Ciao!
Going back to Roma_Victrix's point re: redheaded Cleopatra, it wouldn't be implausible for red hair to be a Ptolemaic trait (especially due to all the incest). IIRC, Thracians were associated w/ red hair, and they're just a stone's throw away from Macedonia (and the Macedonians weren't particularly prickly when it came to diplomatic marriages/concubinage in general). Given that Greeks and Macedonians (at different times) had reason to distinguish Macedonians from Greeks, red-headedness would've been an easy way to do so.
Which would mean that we've got an ethnically-distinct, foreign dynasty in an ancient land who maintain their special looks and hair color through incest... The only conclusion can be:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Excellent points, sir. I'm sure a small amount of southern Greeks had red hair as well, given the large amount of Thracians living in Greece, even in Athens, but the concentration must have been higher in northern Greece, in Macedonia, which was closer to the orbit and center of Thracian civilization and Odrysian Kingdom of Thrace. There was also the exclusive nature of many southern poleis to consider, as they were very guarded about the rules of citizenship and intermarriage with those outside of their city-state. This wouldn't have been as much of an issue for northern Greece, outside of maybe Amphipolis and a few cities.
The depiction of Cleopatra with red hair at Herculaneum could simply be following an artistic trope in Macedonian and Greek art depicting figures with red hair, or indeed the earlier southern Italian (i.e. Magna Graecia) Greek tradition of having various blonde figures in their painted pottery. For instance, this 4th-century BC krater pelike vase from Apulia, southern Italy:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...ainter_MAN.jpg
Indeed, where are they?Which would mean that we've got an ethnically-distinct, foreign dynasty in an ancient land who maintain their special looks and hair color through incest... The only conclusion can be:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
OP's lying, those are just pictures of his mom at work at the Spearmint Rhino in Las Vegas.
The first picture is clearly photoshopped: That's not Cleopatra, I can see the pixels.
Something seemed off about the statue pictures in the first post, and now that I've looked at some of Cleopatra VII's coins, I think I know what's bugging me: her coins almost always show her with a rather prominent chin. Some of them are almost comical in how pointy her chin is. But the Venus in particular has a very smooth face-profile (at least, from the angle of the image) Compare THIS w/ the images in the first post. The nose is another oddity: I'm not seeing the downward pointing shape that we see in the coinage. Numismatics!
What's the rationale for attributing the Esquiline Venus as Cleopatra? The OP says there's good reason: is it because of the context in which it was found?
Lol. This is myopically stupid. Thanks, I lost some brain cells today. Bravo! The picture comes directly from
Walker, Susan. "Cleopatra in Pompei?" in Papers of the British School at Rome, 76 (2008), pp. 35-46 and 345-8., which you can look at and read for yourself (the image itself appearing on p. 347).
Any more bright ideas for us, then, Sherlock Holmes?
Well now you're finally saying something smart (which was strongly suggested in the OP).Something seemed off about the statue pictures in the first post, and now that I've looked at some of Cleopatra VII's coins, I think I know what's bugging me: her coins almost always show her with a rather prominent chin. Some of them are almost comical in how pointy her chin is. But the Venus in particular has a very smooth face-profile (at least, from the angle of the image) Compare THIS w/ the images in the first post. The nose is another oddity: I'm not seeing the downward pointing shape that we see in the coinage. Numismatics!
What's the rationale for attributing the Esquiline Venus as Cleopatra? The OP says there's good reason: is it because of the context in which it was found?
Scholars still wrangle over the Esquiline Venus, with some saying that the facial features are similar to those in the Berlin bust (pictured in the OP), and others saying they are not. Cleopatra's coinage produces its own problems, because scholars agree that her very masculine facial features seem to conform to those of her father's, Ptolemy XII Auletes, and are a lot less smooth than her sculpted images. Notice also how not only her facial features seem to conform to her Macedonian ancestors, but also Mark Antony as well, whose portrait in minted coins with Cleopatra suddenly show Antony with a similar nose and chin. This is unlike other coinage portraits of Antony, such as those minted with Octavian, and for that matter differs from his sculpted busts.
Other arguments in favor of the Esquiline Venus depicting Cleopatra (however flawed or idealized) include the distinctive "melon" hairstyle of hers worn back into a bun, the obvious royal diadem worn over her head (not too many other female monarchs running around with that sort of regalia), and the Uraeus Egyptian cobra wrapped around the base of the vase. The Uraeus was a common royal symbol of the Egyptian pharaohs and were not associated at all with Venus/Aphrodite. I find the arguments of the detractors to be pretty weak, that Cleopatra wouldn't have been depicted as a naked goddess. If the statue was commissioned in Hellenistic Egypt, and is only a Roman copy a century later (as is generally believed), then that argument of theirs is retarded, because we have statues of her wearing the most revealing translucent garb in Egyptian style, as the goddess Isis, that no one in Egypt clearly cared about (or at least they didn't voice their prudish dissent publicly, that we know of). In fact, the very encaustic painting of her commissioned by Augustus, now lost but preserved in a 19th-century steel engraving and archaeological report, clearly shows her with bare breasts as she's being bitten by an asp. Thus even the Romans depicted her in the nude and seemed to have no qualms about it.
And this is Augustus we're talking about, one of the major moralistic prudes of the era.
Last edited by Roma_Victrix; March 20, 2018 at 08:01 AM.
I was joking, good sir. I can get a little acid sometimes, and I forget that this is the internet, and you can't always tell whether or not we're being ironic. I'm sorry about that, and I had a good fun in the discussion as a whole.
And by the way, don't ignore the power of penis size and economic development: there is a legit academic article about it
https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/...9/maleorga.pdf
You guys can analyze coinage and artwork all you want but I don't think we'll truly know if Cleopatra was white or not until we can measure her skull with a nice set of calipers.
This guy knows his phrenology.
More exciting artwork and analysis by Duane W. Roller (2010), who continues to steamroll the naysayers into the dirt, and Susan Walker (2004), whose boots are gonna walk all over you...sorry for the bad puns.
As outlined by Roller, this 1st-century-AD Roman painting from Pompeii most likely depicts Cleopatra VII, in a royal diadem, consuming poison and committing suicide as her anachronistically-older-looking son Caesarion (who was only 17) stands behind her.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:R...ing_poison.jpg
As outlined by Walker (and Roller), the famous Portland Vase in the British Museum can also be interpreted as depicting Cleopatra (with a serpent) and Mark Antony on one side (with his disapproving forefather Anton looking on), while the other side is occupied by Octavia the Younger, the abandoned wife of Antony, being watched over by her brother Octavian, who was most likely emperor Augustus by the time this work of art was commissioned (so sometime between 27 BC and 14 AD).