Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 42

Thread: really hope pike phalanxes arn't as op as they were in rome 1

  1. #1

    Default really hope pike phalanxes arn't as op as they were in rome 1

    seriously it was practically game breaking. and as barbarian factions you had nothing that hope to go toe to toe. i think in rome 2 elite heavy units like oathsword, druidic nobles, evocati, etc should at least possibly be able to cut their way through. thoughs?

  2. #2

    Default

    Fact is that phalanxes were REALLY hard to beat toe to toe.
    What good is your armour and sword if they've got 8 foot long spears pointing at you? Phalanxes were perfectly beatable in RTW. Just don't charge them head on, which is pretty obvious. What tactics do you use against them?

    *18 feet
    Last edited by Daily; August 19, 2013 at 10:04 AM.

  3. #3
    Holger Danske's Avatar Comes Limitis
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    THE NORTH
    Posts
    14,490

    Default Re: really hope pike phalanxes arn't as op as they were in rome 1

    Offensive remarks deleted ~LestaT
    Last edited by AngryTitusPullo; August 19, 2013 at 11:40 PM.

  4. #4

    Default Re: really hope pike phalanxes arn't as op as they were in rome 1

    well i would flank them but they could always just magically change the direction of thier spears and be almost impossible to crack. then theres the square and unless you have really strong missle troops theres nothing you could do playing barbarians. its not that i dont think they should be a tough nut to crack i just dont think they should be able to endlessly mow down hordes of infantry without taking any casualties. in history they were more to pin the enemy in place while the companion cavalry smashed into the flanks. they were the shield in the army not the sword. against well equiped and armoured warriors like roman legionaires or heavy celtic mercenaries like those from galatia employed by ptolemaic egypt eventually they would crack as the full body shields would protect the soldiers from the pikes as they chopped off the ends of the sarrissa and then closed for the kill

  5. #5

    Default Re: really hope pike phalanxes arn't as op as they were in rome 1

    Blace, no a Phalanx wasn't only used as something to pin down the enemy, they also had offensive roles too ( right wing of the phalanx at the battle of Gaugamela). In every battle with the Romans the legions would only retreat and fall back when attacked from the front and any attempt to chop the end of the sarissa was futile ( see the failure of the Romans at the battle of Pydna). There is no chance attacking the phalanx in a frontal assault in even terrain and achieve victory. The Romans couldn't even do it to the classical Greek phalanx, as it was indicated in the battle of Corinth where again they won due to their capability to achieve flanking attacks. So hopefully such a stupidity won't be implemented in the game.
    γνῶθι σαὐτόν

  6. #6
    Smiling Hetairoi's Avatar Semisalis
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Antioch in my dreams
    Posts
    447

    Default Re: really hope pike phalanxes arn't as op as they were in rome 1

    You're a really bad player if you had problems beating the phalanx in Rome 1.

  7. #7

    Default Re: really hope pike phalanxes arn't as op as they were in rome 1

    bullcrap. if you play any barbarian faction you will have a really hard time against phalanx online in rome 1 and if they can just spam stacks against you and guard there flanks well theres not much you can do. even if you beat their flanking cavalry they will just wall up and its impossible to flank a phalanx line unless you pin it from the front which mean sacrificing units since not even chosen swordsmen will last long from the frontand in the end they are just a bit rediculous. you can argue about me being a bad player but in the end theres a reason practically no one plays britons or gauls online and its because they cant do much against phalanx spam unless the player using the phalanx really sucks.

  8. #8
    Archilles's Avatar Semisalis
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    480

    Default Re: really hope pike phalanxes arn't as op as they were in rome 1

    Quote Originally Posted by Smiling Hetairoi View Post
    You're a really bad player if you had problems beating the phalanx in Rome 1.
    So friendly at the beginning of the week???

    Cmon we all know that the pgalanx is very hard to beat - they turn very fast and so on... i mean everyone knows how to attack

  9. #9

    Default Re: really hope pike phalanxes arn't as op as they were in rome 1

    Well to be honest, Phalanx maybe hard to beat on the Front, but they break as easily from the Side7Bakc as every other Infantry, flank them - charge them - see them run.
    A Sarissa Formation is meant to be "Op" from the front, sure in Rome I you could easily turn them 180° in one Second, but Ca already said it will take notable longer.
    Make Total War Great Again

  10. #10
    Primicerius
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Canada
    Posts
    3,522

    Default Re: really hope pike phalanxes arn't as op as they were in rome 1

    Quote Originally Posted by He111 View Post
    Well to be honest, Phalanx maybe hard to beat on the Front, but they break as easily from the Side7Bakc as every other Infantry, flank them - charge them - see them run.
    A Sarissa Formation is meant to be "Op" from the front, sure in Rome I you could easily turn them 180° in one Second, but Ca already said it will take notable longer.
    Even when a pike phalanx formation could turn quickly you could still flank them easily enough once they were engaged by infantry from the front.

  11. #11

    Default Re: really hope pike phalanxes arn't as op as they were in rome 1

    well what ca has said so far is encouraging, that they will stop them for a while but eventually they will get through. i just hope that they dont go back on that idea because of people on the forum whining that they should be invincible from the front which would ruin the game in my opinion

  12. #12
    Smiling Hetairoi's Avatar Semisalis
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Antioch in my dreams
    Posts
    447

    Default Re: really hope pike phalanxes arn't as op as they were in rome 1

    Bring more skirmishers next time.

  13. #13
    Primicerius
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Canada
    Posts
    3,522

    Default Re: really hope pike phalanxes arn't as op as they were in rome 1

    Quote Originally Posted by blace View Post
    well what ca has said so far is encouraging, that they will stop them for a while but eventually they will get through. i just hope that they dont go back on that idea because of people on the forum whining that they should be invincible from the front which would ruin the game in my opinion
    I think they mean that some soldiers will get through. Not that you will win by engaging a pike unit from the front with heavy infantry. In RTW, some soldiers did make it past the pikes as well.

  14. #14

    Default

    i dont mean that they said it will be easy. i just mean that they said it wont be impossible

    phalanxes in street fighting city battles or holding bridges comes to mind
    Last edited by Daily; August 19, 2013 at 10:05 AM.

  15. #15
    alex_shields's Avatar Miles
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH - USA
    Posts
    363

    Default Re: really hope pike phalanxes arn't as op as they were in rome 1

    Shouldn't be impossible to breach them from the front- but it should be very costly. As stated already, they need to be slow and immobile without the ability of individual soldiers to turn. They need to be "locked" into formation facing forward. Turning should result in a disrupted formation or just take a long time.

    BUT, I do think the phalanx should be devastating to troops or cavalry or chariots charging en masse. It was historically devastatingly effective against 'barbarian' tactics of charging straight into it. Blace, charging your barbarian swordsman into a phalanx shouldn't ever work - you'll have to bring it to your forests and ambush it. If that doesn't work, it's because the AI is broken, not the phalanx.

  16. #16

    Default Re: really hope pike phalanxes arn't as op as they were in rome 1

    They should be really tough, but that doesn't make them 'OP'! There's plenty of examples in history of the phalanx's prowess. At the battle of Heraclea, for example, the Romans legionaries, despite their (slightly) superior numbers, could not crack Pyrrhus's phalangites.

  17. #17

    Default

    well i think heavy barbarian infantry should stand just as good a chance as roman infantry as they are more or less similarly equiped (full body shields, heavy chain armour, swords) if persians with wicker shields could put enough pressure onto a phalanx to require alexander to divert his cav from chasing down the persian king to rescue them from routing then i think a heavy enough furious barbarian assualt, while costly, should eventually be able to break through. especially if its made by heavily armored infantry.

    barbarians on the whole did pretty well against hoplite phalanxes, battle of the allia comes to mind. i dont know of any battles where they directly charged pike phalanxes but i know kingdoms like epeiros prized elite barbarian mercenary warriors as shock troops so they must not have been useless

    i mean lets be honest. just because they are barbarians doesn't mean that they are going to voluntarily impale themselves rather then try to use their big shields and swords to work their way through
    Last edited by Daily; August 19, 2013 at 10:06 AM.

  18. #18
    Primicerius
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Canada
    Posts
    3,522

    Default Re: really hope pike phalanxes arn't as op as they were in rome 1

    Quote Originally Posted by blace View Post
    well i think heavy barbarian infantry should stand just as good a chance as roman infantry as they are more or less similarly equiped (full body shields, heavy chain armour, swords) if persians with wicker shields could put enough pressure onto a phalanx to require alexander to divert his cav from chasing down the persian king to rescue them from routing then i think a heavy enough furious barbarian assualt, while costly, should eventually be able to break through. especially if its made by heavily armored infantry.
    The Romans used short swords and Gauls and Germans used longer swords which were at a disadvantage in close combat. They should still show pretty good resistance when facing Romans, though.

    At Gaugamela, Alexander was outnumbered at least two to one (some historians quote the Persian numbers as much higher). In order to cope with this, Alexander spread his line very thin. Perhaps too thin. This allowed some Persian cavalry to break through a part of the line when the phalanx was engaged with the Persian infantry. If Alexander hadn't spread his line out and wasn't outnumbered in such a way he probably wouldn't have had the same problem.
    Quote Originally Posted by blace View Post
    i mean lets be honest. just because they are barbarians doesn't mean that they are going to voluntarily impale themselves rather then try to use their big shields and swords to work their way through
    This didn't work too well for the Romans unless the phalanx was already broken up.

  19. #19
    Col. Tartleton's Avatar Comes Limitis
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Cape Ann
    Posts
    13,053

    Default Re: really hope pike phalanxes arn't as op as they were in rome 1

    Well let's think about this:

    A Macedonian syntagma is a unit of 256 men arrayed 16x16 or 32x8 armed with pikes and swords.

    A Roman maniple is 120 men arrayed 40x3 armed with javelins, shields, and swords.

    Phalanxes fail when the ground is broken, that is to say when the battlefield makes it impossible for units to stay aligned properly (which is why Napoleonic infantry usually attacked in column and masse, not in line). Thus breaking up the line of battle. So it becomes ___ ---- ___ ---- ---- ___ ---- ___ ___ ----.

    Furthermore given how large a unit 256 men is, under a hail of javelins, and other missiles crowd psychology will cause trouble if they aren't veteran or well lead. Phalanxes will ball up, becoming increasingly tight and ineffective until the inner men suffocate from the pressure and the other men lose their ability to fight coherently. At which point the Romans or similar forces use their shields and swords to get through the disarrayed pikes and into hand to hand. Plus Romans are fierce combatants, better trained in their martial arts than the Greeks.
    Last edited by Col. Tartleton; August 19, 2013 at 06:21 AM.
    The Earth is inhabited by billions of idiots.
    The search for intelligent life continues...

  20. #20

    Default Re: really hope pike phalanxes arn't as op as they were in rome 1

    unless of course you think those big full body shields were just for decoration because we all know that barbarians were mindless savages who could never concieve of something like using a shield to protect himself and work his way in

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •