For many people on this trhread, there seems to be a deep confusion between hate-filled individuals committing horrible crimes, trying desperately to justify their violence in the name of an outdated religion's revamped fanatical-last-cry-philosophy, and the actions and intentions of entire nations of people who happen to be "muslim"; it's as stupid an extrapolation as taking the latest white-supremacist school shooter from the US, or that psycho norvegian guy, or the christian zealot who shot up that black church or
on that synagogue's altar, and saying that all white people, or all christians are bloodthirsty savages. To put it another way, if i believe the fact that the actions of certain muslims or immigrants means that all of them are savages, why is it wrong for me to believe that all white christians deserve gruesome deaths in retaliation for the horrible crimes a few of their people or politicians have committed? If the answer is that i believe one point of view because i belong to the stereotyped grouping in question, then there is something inherently biased about my opinion. All sensible people can see that horrible crimes are the products of twisted minds; the challenge is to fight the causes of that twisting, be they religious manipulation, poverty, psychological isolation, bullying, political corruption, war, capitalist greed, geopolitical crisis etc, not to demonise an entire segment of the human race. And if your default reaction to atrocities is to pursue aforementioned demonisation, then sorry to break it to you, but you are an ethno-fascist, and your ultimate argument will be for a new auschwitz, and no sane human can support that.