Liberal inquisition: the persecution of Alex Jones

[Vanoi]

Social media isn't a monopoly. That was established in the social media thread. Social media is more than Facebook and Twitter.

So, racists can deny service to blacks, Christian and cMuslim can deny service to gays?

Nope that's discrimination based on a person's religion or race. Alex Jones is being banned for violating various policies on Twitter and Facebook.

[PointOfViewGun]

If you force a monopoly on certain field, this case being social media, then you should not have such right.

Who forced who to have a monopoly on social media?

[Heathen Hammer]

On the other hand, it seems certain people cannot accept that when companies take 'liberal' measures, it's actually the result of a cold corporate analysis that to not do so would damage their brand.

So... having literal terrorist groups including Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood doesn't damage the brand, but having Infowars does? See, this kind of hypocritical BS is the reason why Infowars and independent media in general is growing so popular.

Who forced who to have a monopoly on social media?

Companies that have access to other competitor social media outlets limited or denied. I.e. the whole gab.ai thing.

Social media isn't a monopoly. That was established in the social media thread. Social media is more than Facebook and Twitter.

It was established in social media thread that it is de-facto a monopoly, where access to competitors is limited as well.

Nope that's discrimination based on a person's religion or race. Alex Jones is being banned for violating various policies on Twitter and Facebook.

No, he was banned for no reason. Otherwise it wouldn't make sense that Muslim militant groups are still there.

[Basil II the B.S]

Nope that's discrimination based on a person's religion or race. Alex Jones is being banned for violating various policies on Twitter and Facebook.

So we are supposed to believe that FB/Youtube/Spotify ignored Alex Jones for all this time, then the very same day they woke up and decided to ban him out of the blue because ''he broke the rules''? 4 different companie checked the same guy, the same day?

Do you really think everyone who disagrees with your liberticide policies is completely retarded?

Btw, here's an example of what liberals believe in and Jack Dorsey endorses, since they are all registered users on his platform and he definitely think their language and opinion are ok.

Warning, viewer discretion, vulgar language, censorship bypass and all that.

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

https://i.imgur.com/Loor7yO.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/58F6DYS.jpg

Then you guys want me to believe that liberals don't hate white people and don't want genocide.. they say it out loud.
Should we start applying the hate speech laws you guys made? That's 15 billion dollars fine for Twitter to begin with.

[PointOfViewGun]

Companies that have access to other competitor social media outlets limited or denied. I.e. the whole gab.ai thing.

So, total BS then...

[Vanoi]

.It was established in social media thread that it is de-facto a monopoly, where access to competitors is limited as well.

Howcan they gave a monopoly if they're are 15 other social media outlets in the world? YouTube is almost as popular as Facebook and Reddit is more popular than Twitter and Alex Jones isn't banned there.

A monopoly by definition out competes every other company but they obviously don't or Facebook would be the only social media around.

No, he was banned for no reason. Otherwise it wouldn't make sense that Muslim militant groups are still there.

No he was banned for a reason.

So we are supposed to believe that FB/Youtube/Spotify ignored Alex Jones for all this time, then the very same day they woke up and decided to ban him out of the blue because ''he broke the rules''? 4 different companie checked the same guy, the same day?

Do you really think everyone who disagrees with your liberticide policies is completely retarded?

Tolerated. Alex Jones is facing a defamation suit and has been in the public eye now for a while. He is bring bad publicity now. He was flying under the radar before.

Btw, here's an example of what liberals believe in and Jack Dorsey endorses, since they are all registered users on his platform and he definitely think their language and opinion are ok.

Warning, viewer discretion, vulgar language, censorship bypass and all that.

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

https://i.imgur.com/Loor7yO.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/58F6DYS.jpg

Then you guys want me to believe that liberals don't hate white people and don't want genocide.. they say it out loud.
Should we start applying the hate speech laws you guys made? That's 15 billion dollars fine for Twitter to begin with.

Does Jack represent all liberals now? No one wants to hear more of your alt-right theories on white genocide again seriously. You sound like you need a safe space.

[Aexodus]

Twitter shares fall 12% in the week of Jack Dorsey’s testimony

So much for ‘cold corporate analysis’...

and if it’s A-ok for twitter to refuse service to conservatives, then why are they being made to testify before congress?

[Vanoi]

Twitter shares fall 12% in the week of Jack Dorsey’s testimony

So much for ‘cold corporate analysis’...

and if it’s A-ok for twitter to refuse service to conservatives, then why are they being made to testify before congress?

From your source:

Dorsey testified before two congressional committees Wednesday to address online election interference and claims of political bias on the platform. They're familiar conversations for Twitter by now, as scrutiny of social media companies heightens ahead of the midterm elections in November.

[Aexodus]

And your point is?...

edit: so this is the exchange that got him banned, for ‘bullying’

[Gaidin]

Not due to the publicity stunt. Due to violation of Twitter policy. I'm not sure how local TWC conservo-conspiracy people can complain. Twitter was the one that held out as long as they possibly could. The violation of Twitter policy was when he posted an abuse and harassment video that was literally at their congressional testimony. They literally held out until he walked up to them and dropped on their shoes. They couldn't look the other way to spite the liberals anymore.

So really. Go complain somewhere else.

https://twitter.com/TwitterSafety/status/1037804427992686593

[Basil II the B.S]

Does Jack represent all liberals now? No one wants to hear more of your alt-right theories on white genocide again seriously. You sound like you need a safe space.

His company is 90% liberal and he tolerates such views of registered users from his Platform. Apparently that's an alt right Conspiracy theory because you heard that from that sorry ass loser, stinking human garbage that is Hillary Clinton.

Of course, not a word against the the hundreds of examples genocidal liberals posted. It's pretty clear what your position is.

This is why conservatives need guns.

[Vanoi]

His company is 90% liberal and he tolerates such views of registered users from his Platform. Apparently that's an alt right Conspiracy theory because you heard that from that sorry ass loser, stinking human garbage that is Hillary Clinton.

White genocide is alt right. But you never answered my question. Does Jack represent all liberals?

[Gaidin]

If you are looking for conspiracy theories stick to throwing tantrums in the Russia collusion containment thread.

So you admit he broke twitter policy by posting an abuse and harassment video on twitter, and so they banned him?

[Basil II the B.S]

White genocide is alt right. But you never answered my question. Does Jack represent all liberals?


Why should i care about those people? Idiots will be idiots. I don't advocate for replacement migration at all and I do deny the whole South Africa affair. It's been completely blown out of proportion.

What's funny is that you seem to have taken on some ideas of white nationalism.

I'm Italian and according to white nationalists, we are the n-word of Europe and I'm not white. I'm fine with that. According to liberals however, I'm white enough to be inherently guilty of colonialism, the holocaust, the crusades and whatever else. Who's worse?

As for Jack Dorsey, he represents a company where liberals are in power. Just like Zuckerberg and Susan Wojcicki. There's a pretty strong consistency in the trend liberals->power->mass censorship.

So you admit he broke twitter policy by posting an abuse and harassment video on twitter, and so they banned him?

You shouldn't try strawmen with me instead.

[Vanoi]

I'm Italian and according to white nationalists, we are the n-word of Europe and I'm not white. I'm fine with that.

That's White Supremacists. White nationalist are a bit different and it all depends on the group. Some don't like Italians while others just care if you're white.

According to liberals however, I'm white enough to be inherently guilty of colonialism, the holocaust, the crusades and whatever else. Who's worse?

Blanket statements will get you no where.

As for Jack Dorsey, he represents a company where liberals are in power. Just like Zuckerberg and Susan Wojcicki. There's a pretty strong consistency in the trend liberals->power->mass censorship.

Censorship implies they can't speak their mind anymore. Social media is but one medium to get your voice out.

[Gaidin]

You shouldn't try strawmen with me instead.

You shouldn't strawman twitter. He either violated Twitter policy or he didn't by posting the video. Pick one.

[Aexodus]

You do realise he didn’t actually confront him, ON twitter

[Gaidin]

So proximity harassment is allowed? Interesting interpretation. Pretty sure Twitter's not buying it though.

[The spartan]

Why are we concerned about Alex Jones at all? He isn't even a journalist, he is just some guy who says crazy things.

[HannibalExMachina]

its a good example of media complicity in the rise of hucksters like jones and trump: they get 24/7 attention, until they actually become someone you have to take note off.

cut off the attention, cut off the lifeline. no war or hungercrisis, no matter how disastrous, can keep people's attention, unless the media hammers it home constantly.