The Armenian Issuehttp://www.twcenter.net/forums/group.php?groupid=1930
GTA 6 Thread
https://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?819300-GTA-6-Reveal-Trailer
"We're nice mainly because we're rich and comfortable."
There was no evidence that Alex Jones violated any rules to begin with. They just said that he did when they banned him, obviously as part of big tech collusion, and nobody knows what for.
Most of the above-mentioned groups are internationally recognized as terrorist groups. Some are affiliated with ones like AQ and ISIS.
The list from the state department of USA does not contain FSA, Islamic Front or Muslim Brotherhood. It also doesn't contain Lord's Resistance Army. You wanna specifically rely on that?
Evidence of him violating the rules was posted by others before his ban. So, what evidence is there that those accounts violated Twitter's rules?
The Armenian Issuehttp://www.twcenter.net/forums/group.php?groupid=1930
GTA 6 Thread
https://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?819300-GTA-6-Reveal-Trailer
"We're nice mainly because we're rich and comfortable."
One thing is for certain: the more profoundly baffled you have been in your life, the more open your mind becomes to new ideas.
-Neil deGrasse Tyson
Let's think the unthinkable, let's do the undoable. Let us prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all.
The argument ''we do it only in private companies don't worry'' isn't an argument because globalist leaning government in Europe all passed censorship laws in Italy/France/Germany. The only reason it's not happening in the US yet is that Trump runs the show for now.
Nonetheless he should really look into anti-trust arguments and break Google/FB/Twitter. No kind of temporary stock market gain is worth surrendering free speech and press to their enemies.
-
Meanwhile to counter the accussations of bias, FB has added ''The Weekly Standard'' run by Neocon garbage Bill Kristol as ''factchecker'' and he immediately stomped ''Think Progress'' that was elated at Jones' ban.
https://www.theverge.com/2018/9/12/1...ct-check-false
LOL
Of course the Atlantic Council approves
Last edited by Basil II the B.S; September 18, 2018 at 04:45 PM. Reason: gr
This one's done and dusted. Jones broke a private contract and people want him legislated out of a ban? OK but it sounds like state intervention in private enterprise to me you commies.
Jatte lambastes Calico Rat
Point me where I said I want the state to legislate him out of the ban (though you'd be fine if it was your side doing it).
One thing is for certain: the more profoundly baffled you have been in your life, the more open your mind becomes to new ideas.
-Neil deGrasse Tyson
Let's think the unthinkable, let's do the undoable. Let us prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all.
Actually all this censorship on social media started long before Alex Jones. More specifically after Merkel went full retard on open borders, then rapes happened, then Islamic terrorism, so her solution was to make a law compelling social media to remove content or face fines.
So yeah stop pretending there's ''no government involved''. There are multiple governments lead by treacherous liberal scum pressuring social media to censor content. That lying sack of rubbish Macron is another, Renzi was another but fortunately Italians are smart and they got rid of him.
There's only one question and that's how do we prevent liberals from taking away constitutional freedoms.
The US government has not interfered with any of these sites operations so as American companies their 1st Amendment rights are very well protected.
You, for one, don’t understand how this law works.
Europe? Well, Europe doesn’t guarantee the right in such a way as America does.
One thing is for certain: the more profoundly baffled you have been in your life, the more open your mind becomes to new ideas.
-Neil deGrasse Tyson
Let's think the unthinkable, let's do the undoable. Let us prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all.
I've always gotten the impression that frogs are much less concerned about such normative labels, and they'd kind of have to be considering the types of debauchery they tend to engage in.
Until liberals take over the Supreme Court and the govt, then they'll do the same as Europe. Trump's victory and Brexit are the other catalysts that caused this. You can't say there's no precedent of Orwellian liberals in government enacting censorship on social media recently because there is.
It is also pretty evident because in US campuses liberal activists have mounted regular protests against free speech. It's always the same side doing this.
Ignore List (to save time):
Exarch, Coughdrop addict
I suppose because we’re Europeans with no 1st amendment rights, we tend to see most censorship in a similar light.
And his point about it usually being ‘one side’ has a basis in fact, it means that it doesn’t seem a level playing field, unless both left and right stoop down to the same scummy standards.
You do know its the conservatives on the US supreme court who would likely vote against any case regarding free speech extending to social media?
https://qz.com/1323253/what-is-origi...supreme-court/
Its the liberals who would likely support free speech extending to social media.In the strictest sense, originalists see the constitution as a dead, static document, as opposed to the liberal notion of living constitutionalism.But phrasing it that way—as “dead”—might make originalism a lot less appealing to Americans, argues University of Chicago law professor Justin Driver
It’s the liberals who support prohibiting hate speech laws. But yes, liberals in America are generally more partial to intervention than Conservatives in america.
Conservative constitutionalist judges won’t extend free speech to Twitter. I’m pointing out there isn’t a bat in hell’s chance that liberal ones would either.
Basil is agreeing that this isn’t a 1A issue, he’s saying that if liberals takeover the court then hate speech laws akin to Europe will appear leading to the government arresting people for tweets.