Results 1 to 1 of 1

Thread: [Section 1: Introduction to Liberty, Rights, and Equality.] Case Brief: Plessy vs Ferguson

  1. #1

    Default [Section 1: Introduction to Liberty, Rights, and Equality.] Case Brief: Plessy vs Ferguson

    Plessy v. Ferguson was important because it upheld “separate but equal” doctrine. This decision allowed, upheld, and strengthened laws that allowed segregation so long as “equal” facilities were provided to both races. It found such laws to be consistent with the 14th amendment.

    Plessy v. Ferguson


    Summary of Facts: Louisiana Railway Accommodations Act, Section 1, required that all railway companies provide “separate but equal” accommodations for its white and black customers. Homer Plessy, a mixed man (1/8th African), boarded a “whites only” car and was arrested.

    Question Presented: Was the Louisiana Railway Accommodations Act consistent with the 14th Amendment?

    Decision: Yes.

    Reasoning: The 14th amendment ensures equality between races, but it does not abolish distinctions between either. Laws requiring separation do not imply inferiority.
    Last edited by Love Mountain; May 30, 2018 at 05:09 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •