Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: [ANW - Language Family & Civilizations] The Mun'umati and minor Mun'umati civilizations

  1. #1
    Barry Goldwater's Avatar Mr. Conservative
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Richmond, Virginia
    Posts
    16,469

    Default [ANW - Language Family & Civilizations] The Mun'umati and minor Mun'umati civilizations

    The Mun'umati
    'Mun'umati', or 'Sandmen' in the language of the prominent Shamshi tribe, refers to the language family dominant in the western parts of the Great Sand Sea, as the Mun'umati themselves called that vast desert straddling the border between the 'Awali Riverlands and the grasslands of the Suufolk. There is precious little to say, or know, of the Mun'umati before the late Bronze Age: most of them were tribal nomads who lived simple lives, wandering from one oasis to another to gather water and fruit & to graze their paltry herds, and left very little in the way of lasting artifacts. Some tribes found seasonal work as escorts for the occasional trade caravan crossing the hot sands, protecting these foreign traders from their own kind, but nothing resembling a permanent state or government seems to have been established in the Great Sand Sea during the entirety of the Bronze Age. Other tribes on the western border gained the permission of 'Awali kings (starting with those of the Ubeizani Empire) to seasonally migrate onto their turf and let their herds graze on the much more fertile 'Awali lands in exchange for a tribute of milk, meat, wool and cheese. Those tribes that could would barter excess meat and fruit produce in 'Awali cities for crops and clothes to bring back to their people.

    Modern speech Early Munu'mat
    Man, men Mat, umati
    Woman, women Nisa, ranisa
    Camel Yemel
    Sand Mun
    Sun Šamaš

    The Mun'umati were not among the first to have domesticated the horse, but they were likely the first people on the planet to have domesticated camels. They had to out of necessity, as the camel was the best-suited mount to a desert environment any human could ask for. Any given tribe typically travels as a great winding column, with camel-riding men lining up at the front, rear and flanks to watch out for hostile creatures or raiders from other tribes while the women, children, sick and elderly are bunched up on the inside of the formation.

    Artist's impression of a Munu'mat nomad and his family, c. 5600 AA

    A few Mun'umati did settle down to found oasis towns. Researchers have found the ruins of mud-brick houses, firepits, broken pottery (all decorated with animal and geometric motifs in red or brown on a pink-tan clay) and earthen walls at these sites. Apparently, the settled Mun'umati cultivated dates and figs, using crude irrigation channels to feed trees further away from the spring itself, and fielded as many horses as they had camels. If the oasis were finally exhausted, the tribe living there would make themselves some new tents and simply move on. One such oasis town did exhibit signs of a violent struggle - damaged and buried skeletons, broken and stained copper spearheads - indicating that two tribes may have fought for the same oasis out of desperation.

    Another source of income and a reason to embrace a sedentary lifestyle for the Mun'umati were salt mines. Salt was a tremendously valuable commodity, and some tribes would build semi-permanent settlements at the entrances of known mines & attack passing caravans or other tribes for slaves to work in the tunnels. These 'salt tribes' went on to barter their commodities in 'Awali markets further west, and could expect far higher prices for what they were bringing than the usual meats, hides and occasional figs the other Mun'umati had to offer. That said, the relatively small populations of Mun'umati tribes, the unpredictability of outcomes inherent to their raids, and technological limitations prevented even the most ruthless Mun'umati from exploiting a salt mine so greatly as to make it a full-time, sedentary enterprise, at least for now.

    The beginnings of a Munu'mati oasis town

    Only a few of the oldest Mun'umati tribes are known by name to modern historians. They include the aforementioned Shamshi, 'Children of the Sun'; the 'Ilmi, 'Righteous Ones'; the Hamni, 'Fearless Ones'; the Taibani, 'Raging Ones'; and the Enezi, the 'Forlorn'. Curiously, all known Mun'umati tribes appear to have been monolatristic or monotheistic, at a minimum revering one god above all others and some even believing their god was the only one. What is known however, is that all of these tribes moved at some point into the 'Awali Riverlands, introducing camels, horses and spoked wheels to the region along with tremendous amounts of death and upheaval. But that is a story for another time - the late Bronze Age and its end, to be exact.

    Range of Mun'umati artifacts and movements by 9,500 AA

    Map of the Riverlands, c. 10,500 AA


    Yellow - Shamshi lands (red: Hejra)
    Black - Taibani lands (red: Aju-Timeat)
    Blue - 'Illam (red: Sa-Bel)
    Last edited by Barry Goldwater; May 13, 2018 at 07:57 PM.

  2. #2
    Barry Goldwater's Avatar Mr. Conservative
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Richmond, Virginia
    Posts
    16,469

    Default Re: [ANW - Language Family & Civilizations] The Mun'umati and minor Mun'umati civilizations

    A sandstorm raging in the South: The Taibani
    Modern recreation of the Moon of the Raging Ones (Taibani)

    The second of the great Mun'umatic powers that emerged from the Dark Age of the Riverlands were the Taibani, whose name literally meant 'Raging Ones'. In past centuries they had been one of the greatest and most warlike tribes of the Great Sand Sea, and bitter rivals with the Shamshi; however, both parties set aside their rivalry to work together when faced with the disasters brought about by the Great Cooling, and when fighting as one force they were able to lead other like-minded Mun'umati to victory over the 'Awali Empire. Their alliance did not last long after that, however - the Taibani broke a peace accord with the 'Awali, having grown unsatisfied with 'only' half the Riverlands, and destroyed their civilization in a brutal offensive that was not supported by the Shamshi. Having conquered the lands south of the Muryurir River while their Shamshi and 'Illami rivals ruled north of it, the Taibani proceeded to have a grand old time fighting all of their neighbors throughout this dark age, and by 10,500 AA had built the largest (though also the most loosely & poorly governed) empire of the three.

    Settled Taibani society
    It would be a stretch to describe Taibani society, even after their conquest of the southern Riverlands, as 'settled'. Unlike their Shamshi neighbors to the north, the Taibani made little effort to ingratiate or integrate themselves with the 'Awali they had conquered, and in effect remained a segregated parallel society to the 'Awali who now found themselves bumped down to the bottom half of their overlords' social ladder. The conquerors continued to live as they did, in the form of nomadic or semi-nomadic clans that wandered their new realm - even their rulers, the Gleaming Kings, did not establish a fixed capital and instead wandered from place to place at the head of an itinerant royal court, though they did use the ruins of the city of Zaibali as the Aju-Timeat, or 'meeting grounds', for great gatherings of the tribal chiefs, for example to elect a new Gleaming King or for the announcement of a new war - and legally kicked 'Awali farmers off their fields whenever they felt like they could set their herds free to graze. Gleaming Kings were still elected exclusively by Taibani tribal elders, with absolutely no input from the 'Awali subjects of their realm. And while Taibani marriages with 'Awali women were not totally unheard of, they appear to have occurred far less frequently than among the Shamshi - there is little doubt among modern historians that the Taibani generally preferred to marry among themselves - and marriages of 'Awali men to Taibani women were actually explicitly prohibited, according to the reports of outside observers.

    A Taibani nobleman and his chief wife, c. 10,350 AA

    The Taibani also continued to entertain themselves in traditional ways. This meant, besides every man in the tribe of some means amassing as large a harem as they could, conducting bloodsports. As their name might suggest, the 'Raging Ones' were an extremely bloodthirsty lot who loved battle, and between wars they would routinely hold gladiatorial matches between clan champions and volunteers from other Taibani clans, hapless 'Awali subjects (or criminals) drafted into being the day's entertainment, or animals. Not all fights were to the death: the well-traveled Shamshi chronicler 'Ibar bar al-As recorded such a gladiatorial duel between the champions of the Ihani and Jelali clans, which ended when the latter warrior drew first blood. However, certainly the matches that were deemed the most entertaining were the death matches (which also doubled as an execution method for criminals, who were pitted against fully armed foes or wild beasts with at best joke 'weapons' such as carrots or sticks), either against human foes or beasts that had been deliberately fed a bare minimum of rations to keep them both in fighting condition and ravenous at the same time.

    Other bloodsports known to have been practiced by the Taibani included the running of a bull through every town on full moons - with every man in said town donning red-painted wolf hides and trying to kill the bull with long daggers and short spears - as part of a ritual sacrifice to their god, hunting, rat-baiting and cockfighting among the lower status men & women of the tribe, and a game in which two camel/mule-riders would charge at one another on either side of a tilting fence, flinging blunted javelins and trying to knock the other off their mount. Taibani boys were expected to prove their manhood in three ceremonies between the ages of 12 and 15: first they had to jump over a row of four ornery bulls; then, they had to be able to keep a wolf at bay for one hour without killing it, and while armed with only a blunt spear; and finally, they had to either personally behead a condemned criminal, or kill a man on the battlefield.

    A Taibani princeling's coming-of-age ceremony

    Beyond power, social roles were also segregated. War was the exclusive province of the Taibani, whose clans never liked missing a fight and always rallied without fail to answer a call to arms issued by the Gleaming King. In contrast, the 'Awali were given the reins over the civilian side of things: the majority (as was the case up north as well) farmed rice and vegetables in the countryside, the greatly diminished populations of the dilapidated cities ceased to manufacture luxuries and instead prioritized churning out military equipment for their masters, and while the Taibani do not appear to have had much interest in scholarship, some clans did apparently retain the services of a handful of 'Awali scribes throughout the centuries to keep track of their revenue, possessions and the dates of royal calls-to-arms. Unlike the Shamshi, the Taibani do not appear to have made much use of "Awali auxiliaries - indeed the only armed 'Awali appear to have been town militias organized purely for defensive purposes - and frequently denigrated the 'Awali as a 'soft' and 'cowardly' people unsuited for war.

    A wall fresco depicting 'Awali slaves laboring for their new masters, dated to 10,400 AA

    The old 'Awali elite were evidently not pleased at being locked out of power by their new overlords, and were known to have revolted many times against the Taibani. A fragmentary account from Shamshi lands, dated to about 10,250 AA, noted that a Taibani clan they'd been trading with had been ambushed and massacred by the 'Awali whose lands they were squatting on that summer. Some of the surviving monuments erected by the Gleaming Kings of this period were even more blunt: the obelisk built by a Haifar ul-Ithar, dated to approx. 10,280 AA, bragged in graphic detail about how he had broken the rebellious city of Lashga by 'the worthless maggots infesting this land before we came' and burned some of the rebel ringleaders ('feeble princes with no thrones') with their families, had others dismembered by horse, and impaled yet others around the city, while also nailing the skins of their followers to the walls. Needless to say, the Taibani were not forgiving masters, and the bloodthirst they displayed on battlefields was matched only by the sadistic joy they openly exhibited when dealing with the vanquished.

    The Taibani also subjugated some of the easternmost Qormat and Ometic-speaking peoples. Unlike the 'Awali, these were offered positions as auxiliaries in the Taibani armies, though not the ability to participate in what passed for a political process. Perhaps the Taibani respected these peoples' martial prowess more than they did the "Awali, or perhaps they were just too remote and their populations not sufficiently dense to be controlled easily; either way, the Taibani generally permitted them to govern themselves so long as they paid an annual tribute to the Gleaming Kings, allowed Taibani clans to squat on their lands at will and contributed manpower to their overlords' wars.

    Taibani religion
    The ancient Taibani religion is best described as an Ancestral faith that was Martial at its soul, symbolized by a stark black-and-white standard. Its adherents called themselves the Ahl al-Nebu, or 'People of the Moon'. They were known to be monotheists, like virtually all Mun'umati, and thus exclusively revered a lunar deity called the Hiyb ul-Shestasir, or 'Silver-Backed Wolf'. Described as a black wolf the size of a mountain that lived on the moon and had a silver stripe running from between its ears to its tail, the Hiyb is thought of as the primordial being that fathered all the Earth with its mate, the Hiyu ul-'Untubiu or 'Golden Wolf' - which tragically died while birthing their massive litter, and whose heart was turned into the sun by her grieving mate. Each of these two primordial wolves' descendants carries within them some of their father's essence: his bloodthirst, cruelty, hunger...and capacity for love. Humans, of course, are no exception, and the Taibani teach that it is best to embrace one's destructive inner passions rather than bottling them up under a veneer of 'civilization' and pretending to be something one is not. There was no apocalyptic event or grand religious salvation to be had by all in Taibani mythology; there was only the struggle throughout and for life, which the Hiyb could make a little easier by granting his favor to those who best sate their inner 'beast', and the souls of those who died in honorable battle would be reincarnated as wolves upon the Earth to further indulge their inner passions without the trappings of civilization or human higher thinking to bind them. The souls of those who died outside of the Silver-Backed Wolf's favor, on the other hand, simply ceased to exist.

    Consequently, the Taibani themselves have gone down in history as a bold, passionate and bloodthirsty people, who did their level best to live up to the tenets of their religion - and made their neighbors pay the price. The Raging Ones elected their rulers, unlike the Children of the Sun and the Righteous Many; when one of their 'Gleaming Kings' died, the chief of each Taibani clan (126 in total were recorded to have existed as of 10,500 AA) would congregate to elect a successor from their ranks. In the event of a deadlock, the two leading candidates were supposed to fight to the death for the throne. The only exception to this rule was if a man of noble blood challenged the Gleaming King to a duel and killed him, in which case he automatically succeeded his victim. Once in power, each Gleaming King was expected to bring glory and new conquests to his people: a monarch whose realm was at peace for too long, or who simply failed to actively and conspicuously lead his warriors from the front in battles, was considered a poor sovereign who failed to reflect the bestial nature imparted unto him by the Silver-Backed Wolf, and could be removed by a sufficiently large majority of the tribal chiefs. The Taibani were thus constantly at war, fighting one or more of their neighbors at a time, and every victory - every conquest - only meant that ultimately, they'd have to find a new enemy to fight.

    The Ahl al-Nebu also considered violence an acceptable way of resolving one's personal issues. Technically, most legal disputes were supposed to be submitted to your clan's elders for arbitration; however, if you disliked their judgment, you could absolutely challenge your opponent to a trial by combat, with the victor being declared right - for clearly, Hiyb favored his case and granted him the victory. Disputes over land, slaves, post-battle plunder or even just personal vendettas were thus often settled with blood. To prevent vendettas from spiraling out of control, judicial duels were also sanctioned to settle cases of inter-clan murder and theft at the earliest opportunity, with the hope that the feud would die with its originators or their nearest kin.

    The Ahl al-Nebu had little mercy to spare for the vanquished: as far as they and their religion's tenets were concerned, life was one massive struggle, and one where the mighty could do whatever they wished to those weaker than them who came under their power. This was the religious justification used to oppress the 'Awali, and to a lesser extent the Qormats and Ometic-speaking tribes subdued by the Taibani. As Murrinat buth Makarib ul-Athir, the Taibani Gleaming King who destroyed Zaba-Tutul, said upon being informed that his terms for the city's surrender (the fairest maiden from each noble household; 5,000 strong horses; 10,000 cattle and pigs in good condition; permanent grazing rights around the city; and their acceptance of him as their overlord, coupled with the provision of arms and armor for every one of his warriors) were too steep to be accepted, recorded by a young 'Awali scribe who he castrated and kept as a court eunuch after his eventual victory:
    Quote Originally Posted by Murrinat buth Makarib ul-Athir
    Woe to the vanquished.
    If thou do not accept the terms I offer thee now, I shall impose even harsher terms when I have attained my complete victory, which I surely shall in a fortnight;
    Where now I promise to scourge thee with a whip made from bull's hide, then I shall scourge thee with scorpions;
    And where I would place a yoke of oak upon thy necks now, then I will place a barbed yoke of pure iron.
    I ask for one daughter from each of thine families today; deny me this, and I will take all of them in a fortnight instead.
    I say now that I will be content to take thine dignity, but leave thee with thine lives if thee but bend the knee to me; deny me that, and I will rob thee of both dignity and life in a fortnight.
    I ask again: dost thee still feel it is wise to refuse mine terms?

    Early Taibani military
    Much like their society, the Taibani style of warfare did not change much after their conquest of the Zaba-Tutuli empire. Instead they stuck to Mun'umati tradition and disdained any lessons they could learn from 'Awali warfare, and indeed the 'Awali themselves: this meant an all-cavalry army, highly mobile and devastating on the battlefield against the infantry and chariot-heavy armies of most of their new neighbors or while pillaging the countryside of a hostile nation, but inept at siege warfare and unable to do little more than simply wait outside a town's walls until the defenders starved. The Taibani host was composed of every able-bodied man from each of their clans who could ride a horse, camel, donkey or mule, and divided into two parts like the army of their Shamshi rivals to the north; some served as light missile troops, flinging javelins or firing slings and bows at the foe from horseback and always retreating before they could come to blows in a melee, and a more heavily armored corps of lancers who wore helmets and armor of iron scales, leather lamellar, bone and horn plates or simply extra layers of clothing & padding and fought with a short lance, ax, cudgel or sword, and wicker shield. The Taibani were known to retain a greater number of lancers, at the expense of the ranks of their missile cavalry, in comparison to the Shamshi.

    That said, despite their traditional ways and heavy favoring of cavalry, the Taibani did not build an empire by being tactical or strategic idiots, either. They learned very early on that the scent of camels frightened horses, and any halfway competent Taibani leader thus knew to immediately deploy their camelry against any cavalry and chariotry they might face on the battlefield. When dealing with infantry or numerically superior bodies of enemy troops in general, the favored Taibani tactic was to have a loosely organized mass of light cavalry harass the foe and mount feigned retreats in a bid to get the enemy to pursue them, only for their heavy lancers to charge in and crush the disorganized foe once they had been drawn out of formation and scattered in pursuit of the lighter Taibani forces.

    A Taibani camel-lancer, c. 10,500 AA

    Moreover, while the Taibani did not deploy 'Awali soldiers on campaigns, they did make use of Qormat and Ometic-speaking auxiliaries to compensate for their lack of infantry. These men, a mix of conscripts and volunteers attracted by the prospect of winning glory & a share of the loot in one or more of their overlords' endless wars, were typically lightly or completely un-armored but, being more numerous than the Taibani themselves and fleet of foot on account of their light equipment, fulfilled valuable roles as long-range skirmishers or meat-shields in melee on the battlefield, and sappers and wall-takers in sieges. Some later Taibani warlords tried to imitate the combined-arms tactics often used against them by the Shamshi and use their auxiliary infantry as 'anvils' against which their cavalry could pin down and destroy the enemy, but their light armor (or total lack thereof) frequently made them unsuitable for this purpose; rather, the auxiliaries were at their best when aggressively deployed in large skirmish lines or dense assault blocks and columns, meant to rapidly close in and crush the enemy upon achieving local numerical superiority instead of getting bogged down in a protracted melee where their light gear and often poor morale left them at a disadvantage.

    The Taibani also employed infantry mercenaries, who they considered more reliable than their auxiliaries - even if they, being a culture that loved to fight for the sake of fighting, treated the concept of fighting for pay with some disdain. Ometic, western Qormat, fellow Mun'umati and Suuvulk mercenaries could all be found in Taibani ranks. It is uncertain whether they deployed Golga and Thunderbeasts like their northern adversaries did, but what is less uncertain is that the Raging Ones made up for any Thunderbeast deficiency they may have had by introducing elephant warfare to the Riverlands, having purchased the great creatures from the Omete or rounded up elephant herds in their raids into the southwestern savanna around the Lewaye River.

    A clash of auxiliaries: 'Awali soldiers & chariot in Shamshi service engaging Qormat and Ometic warriors fighting for the Taibani, c. 10,480 AA
    Last edited by Barry Goldwater; May 13, 2018 at 08:23 PM.

  3. #3
    Barry Goldwater's Avatar Mr. Conservative
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Richmond, Virginia
    Posts
    16,469

    Default Re: [ANW - Language Family & Civilizations] The Mun'umati and minor Mun'umati civilizations

    Quicksand: The Enezi
    The Enezi, or 'Forlorn', were the major Mun'umati tribal confederation that settled in the marshes southeast of the River Hasbana, fed by said river's smaller southern tributaries; in 'Awali times, some effort had been made to drain this part of Zaba-Tutul's northern frontier and turn it into farmland, but the collapse of that empire resulted in the breakdown of what few sluices & irrigation channels had been made and the total reversion of the region into wetland. The Forlorn who lived there are one of the lesser-known Mun'umati tribes, in no small part because they played a much less significant role in regional (to say nothing of global) politics and left behind far fewer written records than the 'Illami, Shamshi or even the Taibani: where the neighboring 'Illamites and Shamshi used a mix of papyrus scrolls, vellum and wax tablets for record-keeping, the Enezi seem to have relied entirely on papyrus and oral traditions, and the former is known to rapidly deteriorate if not sealed carefully. The latter factor was further compounded by the Enezi's lack of stone-working abilities - none of the reed huts that they reportedly lived in (as opposed to mud-brick or stone buildings) have survived the passage of time. Still, they left enough physical evidence and made enough of an impression on their neighbors to have their memory preserved throughout the ages.

    However, the fact that so much of what modern audiences know (or think they know) about the Enezi comes from decidedly biased & unreliable outside sources rather than the Enezi themselves - in particular, from the 'Illamites, who had long been the sworn enemies of the Enezi - poses a serious problem to Enezic historiography. The process of reconstructing a more accurate picture of what the Enezi were like, how their society functioned, how their warriors fought and what their religion has been difficult, as it required extensive recovery of and research into physical artifacts and the occasional ruined murals coupled, with a careful reading of 'Illami & Shamshi sources to determine what is (probably) truth and what was just propaganda.

    Enezi language
    The Enezi language was perhaps the closest to the old Proto-Mun'umati tongue out of all of its descendants, showing very little influence from either the 'Awali or the nearby Shamshi and 'Illami languages and a comparatively conservative (if also simpler) orthography. There is little doubt that this was largely due to geography - the dense marshland that the Enezi chose for their post-migration home could not have been an easy place for foreign influence to penetrate - but it is another reflection of the conservatism of broader Enezi culture, which was fiercely traditional and opposed to change to even greater extremes than the 'Illamites and their 'Righteous Path' in more than a few areas.

    Modern speech Proto-Mun'umati Enezi
    Man, men Mat, umati Mu'at, emu'ateh
    Woman, women Nisa, ranisa Nesa, enesa
    Life Ma'ish Ma'esh
    Death Maw'tah Mawt
    Defense Yanah Yeneh

    Enezi society
    As hinted at under the language section, the society and lifestyle of the Forlorn were both highly conservative. The Enezi may have come far from their ancestral deserts, but they did their best to keep their traditions alive in the marsh they had been calling their homeland since the collapse of the 'Awali Empire regardless. The result was that Enezi society remained fragmented into many tribes, each of which was further divided into clans bound by patrilineal ties, that largely lived quiet and isolated lives in the swamps southeast of the River Hasbana; this was a land of dense forests, swampy rivers lined with thick reeds, knee to waist-deep marshes and mangrove thickets, making life (especially in the summer months, when mosquitoes were a major concern) and warfare alike difficult enough to keep the Enezi from tearing at one another's throats too often.

    Enezi men at work in the marsh, c. 10,180 AA

    Each clan was headed by a single elder or Musnin, elected for life from the ranks of the clan's venerable seniors - any man who'd seen fifty summers and came from a respected family in the clan could make a play for the elder's seat - by all free and mature kinsmen of the clan. Though elected, each elder wielded absolute power within his clan; he decided if they should stay where they lived or move elsewhere, when they made war or peace, how resources were to be distributed, and who could marry who. A larger tribe was headed by a council of the Musnin'i who led its constituent clans, and so each Enezi tribe can be loosely classified as a combination of a representative democracy and a more traditional oligarchy.

    Each Enezi household, a three-generation family led by the oldest man in the house (whose seniority made him its patriarch, naturally), would have lived in houses made of the largest, thickest reeds they could find: bundled into columns, bound and bent into arches, these reeds were then combined one after another and covered with mats woven from smaller reeds to create a longhouse, which floated on artificial islands made of compacted mud and bulrushes. From these mudhifs, the Enezi did what they could to survive: men hunted lizards, frogs, ducks and fish, tended to herds of water buffalo, kept their homes and kin safe from the mimic raptors that stalked the swamps, and farmed wild rice where they could. And while women were considered little more than property in the patriarchal Enezic (and, more generally, Mun'umatic) society, they too helped out by gathering cranberries, lotuses, watercress and cattails, as well as cooking & weaving (both clothes, usually from linen, and building materials, baskets or sandals from reeds). The Enezi built no great cities, and indeed there is no reason to believe that they congregated into any settlement larger than villages of up to a dozen of these mudhifs throughout their history. Each household traditionally brought a fifth of their food to the clan elder twice every year; he would then redistribute the gathered tribute to the clan's families, with those whose members had done particular services for the clan (such as performing especially heroic feats on the battlefield) receiving a larger share.

    Recreation of an Enezi mudhif, c. 10,200 AA

    Though the Forlorn generally liked to keep to themselves, some Enezi did engage in trade, especially from tribes living near the borders of the wetlands. They had very little to offer in the way of crops and goods that couldn't easily be found elsewhere (even slaves taken from rival tribes or neighboring peoples), save one thing: papyrus, which grew aplenty in their new homeland and which they would accordingly trade in vast quantities for food, jewelry and higher-grade iron than what they were used to working with. The Shamshi to the south, among whom there was very high demand for papyrus as a writing material, were their main trading partner, for the 'Illami to the north frequently warred with the Enezi tribes and produced their own papyrus, making them bitter commercial rivals to the Forlorn even on the rare occasion that their peoples weren't openly at war. Enezi merchants rarely resided in foreign countries any longer than it took to complete their business transactions (and those who did were often ostracized back home for having willfully exposed themselves to foreign influence longer than strictly necessary), impairing the Enezi's ability to forge long-lasting trade relationships - chiefly to the benefit of the 'Illamite Vel'elim, who had no such restrictions on their own commercial activity.

    In times of great stress, or major wars with the 'Illami (or more rarely, the Shamshi), the Enezi tribes were known to pull together and elect one of their own who'd proven both great strength and courage to lead them as their Mehrid, or supreme war-leader. This warlord, distinguished from other Enezic tribal leaders by the silver-green pelt of an older mimic-raptor that he draped over his head and shoulders, was tasked with leading the combined armies of the Forlorn against their foe until said foe had been utterly defeated or a peace agreement had been reached. Besides the (in)famous Daydan bul-Wazzah who betrayed the 'Awali to their doom at the start of Man's tenth millennium, five other Enezic Mehrids were recorded in the 'Illamite Qabal and thus remain known to history: Asirteh bul-Yaqur, Urhalb bul-Ibir, Idrim bul-Yurim, Nuqalim bul-Nuqalim, and Ishul bul-Uded.

    None of these five seem to have had the greatest of track records though, for all but the last of these were eventually defeated and slain by the 'Illamite Stewards. Only Ishul seems to have managed to fight the foe to the north (in his case, Steward Galad bet-Lior) to something resembling a standstill and secured a negotiated peace with the 'Illamites, and even he suffered his share of catastrophic defeats. Evidently, the key to Enezic victories over the 'Illami was to remain on the defensive and engage the armies of the Righteous Many on their marshy home ground; every one of those first four Mehrids were vanquished when they attempted to counterattack into 'Illamite territory, and Ishul too barely survived his own disastrous outing into 'Illam, even having to withdraw from the northern frontiers as a result and only regaining an edge over Bet-Lior when he battled the latter deeper into Enezic territory. (well, that or acquire Shamshi support, as the unnamed Enezi Mehrid who succeeded Ishul and slew Bet-Lior in 10,498 AA did)

    Modern depiction of Ishul bul-Uded, the most successful of the Enezi Mershids, floruit c. 10,480-488 AA)

    In general, though the Enezi remained in a constant state of low-level (at best) warfare with the 'Illami for almost as long as the two peoples have lived next to one another, they had the worst of it. Besides losing almost every one of the wars that they fought with 'Illam - something which the 'Illamites attribute to the favor of their own Lord Above, and which secular modern historians believe to be the natural consequence of 'Illam's superior organization and standing armies (in the form of the Sacred Band and the entire Rechabite Sept) - frontier tribes were frequently raided for the only thing of real value they had to the 'Illami (besides papyrus): slaves. The tribes living deeper in the Forlorn hinterland could, at least, count on the denser foliage and their own remoteness from 'Illamite borders for greater protection from the raiders and slave-peddlers of the 'Illami. This is not to say the Enezi were totally helpless incompetents, though; as mentioned above, they fared better in proper battles and large skirmishes on their home turf, and Enezi marauders in reed boats paid back 'Illamite atrocities with their own slaving raids and by torching farms along 'Illam's southern borders as frequently as they were able.

    Enezi religion
    The faith of the Enezi, which they themselves called Tunbit buth-Taydud or 'Path of Renewal', can be best defined as a Mainstream religion with a Traditional soul and a Bastion-of-the-Faith mentality. It is monotheistic, like the other Mun'umati religions, and reveres Ul-Heya, the Forlorn god of life, death and rebirth. In the sparse stone Enezi reliefs that have survived the test of time, Ul-Heya is depicted as a gaunt humanoid figure in a cloak, neither male nor female but possessing the skull of a ram for a head and a pair of black-feathered wings like a raven's, and carrying a lantern in one hand & a spear in the other. It was never referred to with male or female pronouns, but appears to have been venerated as a genderless, indeed virtually featureless entity: a walking, or rather gliding, personification of birth and death. In Enezic reckoning, souls were not destroyed or sent to an extradimensional afterlife after death, but rather reincarnated into newborn infants; Ul-Heya was the one who kept this cycle of death and rebirth going, beckoning recently-passed souls into new vessels with its lantern and freeing those who'd lived long enough from their present bodies with its spear. It is from It that they derive their name, the 'Forlorn', for Ul-Heya doesn't exactly inspire hope in those who follow It.

    A winged ram's skull, one of several symbols (along with the lantern and two crossed spears) attributed to Ul-Heya

    Worship of Ul-Heya seems to have been done in a simple manner, and Its worshipers had a decidedly fatalistic take on life. There was no point in praying to Ul-Heya for a long life, for It dispensed and claimed lives on Its own schedule with no regard for mortal input, nor was there any point in praying to It for prosperity and happiness, for It had nothing to do with such concepts and was utterly emotionless. Instead, the Enezi prayed to Ul-Heya to let them die in meaningful ways, which would shower them with glory and actually aid their communities, and to let them be reborn to nobler lives. The duality of life and death, with each leading into the other per the cycle of reincarnation, and the eternal renewal that Ul-Heya symbolized were also revered concepts.

    Worship of Ul-Heya was apparently conducted at sacred groves and meadows by tribal shamans, who wore shaggy coats of raw hemp & flax as they led somber services and offered up prayers and sacrifices of crops to sacred trees into which wheels - a fitting symbol of Ul-Heya's, considering the reverence attributed to Its role as the caretaker of man's cycle of reincarnation. However, both the Shamshi and 'Illami reported that some Enezi tribes built crude temples (unfortunately built entirely of perishable wood and wicker, hence why none remain as of the modern day) where ram-headed figures of clay with horns made of twisted branches & brambles were venerated as idols representing Ul-Heya, and curiously placed close to the doors and windows - which are, after all, 'portals' to another place, mirroring how one's death and the beginning of new life are just considered portals to new experiences so long as one is guided by Ul-Heya. On certain days of religious import (but most prominently the winter solstice), choice animals were also sacrificed at these trees, with the understanding that their souls would be reborn as human souls in human bodies.

    A dead yet miraculously preserved sacred tree of the Enezi

    The Enezi were oft-mocked by their neighbors, more-so the 'Illamites than the Shamshi (indeed the Enezi are disparagingly called sher'at eravi, 'tree-worshipers', no less than twenty-six times throughout their Qabal), for their worship of an apparently uncaring god; what point was there, they contended, in revering a being that not only did nothing for Its followers but didn't even care for them in the slightest. The Shamshi contended that their Sun gave life to their crops, lit their way during the day, and forced the Moon to continue its work at night; and the 'Illami proclaimed that their Lord Above - while not omnipotent - was at least trying to fight the forces of evil and to guide men to live righteously, which was more than could be said of Ul-Heya. But the Enezi faithful paid no mind to such boasting and preaching, for they knew that their god was eternal, above the foibles of this world, and had no equal. The Sun rose and fell each day, and the white throne of the Lord Above was ever endangered by the claws and legions of the Lord Below, but they could count on Ul-Heya always being there for them and remaining utterly un-distracted from Its duties. What will be, will be; the Forlorn found a strange sort of comfort in the inevitability of their own death and (as far as they were concerned) reincarnation at Ul-Heya's hands, and like the Venskár half the world away, came to consider their mortality & destiny to be things to be left entirely in Its hands, instead focusing their energies on the here-and-now.

    Enezi warfare
    Enezi warfare, like most other things known about them, is known to modern audiences only through the lens of the peoples who fought against them: chiefly the 'Illami, and to a lesser extent the Shamshi, neither of whom were charitably disposed towards the martial abilities of the Forlorn. Both of the Books of Stewards are filled with 'Illami gloating on the topic of their many victories over the Enezi, matched only by their preaching of how the Lord Above was so much mightier than the probably-false-and-otherwise-demonic 'swamp god' of the tree-worshipers, while the Shamshi too boasted of having scourged the Enezi back into line with spears and the Sun's searing rays whenever the 'marsh-men' forgot their place and thought to ransack settlements on their kingdom's northern frontiers. Still, it should be noted that despite their many defeats, the Enezi were never totally destroyed by their neighbors, or even substantially conquered for any appreciable length of time.

    This was, no doubt, partially due to geography: neither the Shamshi nor the 'Illami would have had much interest in trying to rule over a swamp when they both had fertile riverlands of their own to call home. The Enezi too, knew their marshy home well, and were protected not just by the mangrove thickets that concealed their warriors and the knee-deep water & mud that slowed their enemies down, but also by the swarms of mosquitoes and the germs within those stagnant waters that piled pestilence after pestilence upon any enemy foolish enough to wade too deep into the swamp. But that is not to say the Enezi had no defense save the elements, for they were quite capable of defending themselves with spear and ax and bow - at least on their own hometurf. (suffice to say, there are very good reasons as to why the Enezi stopped trying to counterattack beyond their borders beyond mounting raids, most of which have to do with their repeated failures on that front)

    Enezi raiders in Shamshi territory, c. 10,180 AA

    Enezi warriors were described by their foes as being generally un- or very lightly armored, for heavy armor was a hindrance in the fetid swamps that they were most comfortable in. Owing to the dearth of preserved Enezi armor, modern historians have largely come to the conclusion that the overwhelming majority of Enezi fighters would have worn no armor at all, instead entering battle only in layers of woolen clothing (the rough, untreated wool they used had enough animal fat left in it to be almost waterproof, allowing them to safely wade through swampwater) and chiefly wielding either bows or short, stout, iron-headed spears coupled with longer but slimmer javelins and wicker shields covered in animal hide. For close combat, they also carried the axes and machetes that they normally used to clear mangrove thickets or other underbrush in their daily lives. Their primary tactic seems to have been to have their archers distract and pin down the enemy with arrow fire, while the spearmen got as close as they could before loosing a single wave of javelins and then charging in with their spears; not exactly the most complicated of strategies, but perfectly functional given their environment. Almost needless to say, on any battlefield that wasn't a swamp, their unarmored spearmen would be effortlessly shredded by either an 'Illamite or Shamshi army, and their archers - being nothing particularly special - would have followed suit.

    A pair of Enezi warriors, of the sort that 'Illamites would have faced c. 10,325 AA

    The Enezi do not seem to have had much in the way of cavalry or chariotry, though this was completely natural, considering that neither would have been very useful in a marshy environment. Enezi chieftains and Mershids instead fought on foot with their men, garbed in multiple layers of woolen clothing like them but wearing headdresses made of mimic-raptor hide to distinguish themselves. These men also wore lamellar cuirasses made of rawhide, iron veils and helmets (typically just small bowls of iron worn beneath their raptor-head hoods), marking them as the most heavily armored fighters in an overall very sparsely armored army. In their first few engagements, both the 'Illami and Shamshi mistook Enezi warchiefs leading their soldiers on night-raids for actual mimic raptors, and the Qabal duly noted:
    Quote Originally Posted by 1 Stewards, 9:19
    ...but to his great relief, Shachar found that these were not, in truth, the walking lizards that could spout the words of men. They served the Lord Below, as those monsters did, but they were merely men garbed in the hide and feathers of the Speaking Lizards...
    Near 10,500 AA, the Enezi do appear to have finally learned to field small quantities of horsemen. Described as the 'leading men of the tribes' in the Qabal and by Shamshi scribes, these warriors wore lamellar rawhide vests and helmets, fought with medium-length spears and axes or machetes, and rode small but agile and hardy steeds capable of navigating a swamp better than the larger, stronger warhorses of the Shamshi and 'Illami. Within the Enezi swamps, they proved to be highly effective raiders and ambushers, being able to both move more quickly than the Forlorn footsoldiers and survive fierce close-combat actions thanks to their armor. Still, they do not appear to have been anything special outside of their home ground and were reportedly trounced over and over by the horsemen & spearmen of their neighbors pretty much every time they stepped out of the marshes.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •