Californian City Gives Porn Star Key to City for Maligning Trump

[Pontifex Maximus]

In what is possibly one of the most hilarious recent hypocrisies in cannibalistic leftism, Stormy Daniels has been given the key to the city of West Hollywood for performing the crucial, nay, indispensable service of undermining President Trump at a crucial moment which will *hopefully* lead to his impeachment. Much like transexual Bruce Jenner, Daniels is being lauded as a "profile of courage" for her actions in breaching a legal non-disclosure agreement in order to publicize dirt on President Trump in a completely ineffectual effort to undermine President Trump's morality - as if those who voted for him were not completely aware of the type of person they were voting for in the first place. In this era of falsely claimed victories for the endemically hypocritical democrat party, one must wonder: what gives Stormy porn star who ed Trump ten years ago before he had any aspirations to become president moral authority over someone like...Monica Lewinsky or any number of the Clinton accusers who were decried, discredited, and ultimately dismissed in the wake of Clinton's can't-keep-it-in-his-pants-while-in-office-bonanza?

I must applaud porn star and prostitute Stormy Daniels for exposing the evils President Trump engaged in over a decade ago, as to Bill Clinton's indiscretions while serving in various offices and clearly using his government sector career in order to secure some dick suckings I think we can all agree this isn't pertinent, and Hillary's role in minimizing and covering up these dick suckings are clearly not worth mentioning. I am just happy that in 2018, the democrat party can maintain some sort of moral high ground over the evil sexist/racist/homophobic/islamophobic/misogynist/nazi/fascist/xenophibic regime of Donald Trump.

Sorry, I wish this wasn't news. I wish we could discuss policy instead of irrelevant crap like this, but this is the crap the democrats insist matters. Let's discuss why it doesn't matter at all.

[removeduser_487563287433]

Very funny 10/10

Also Ponty is worried cos the porn star and her cheap suit lawyer keep on bringing down Trump's whole legal team, got him to admit he reimbursed Cohen for paying her off, and has been passing evidence to the Russia investigation.

Trump ed a porn star while his wife was pregnant with their child, Ponty, you're gonna have to face that soon, and not just engage in dumb lazy Clinton whataboutism

[Morticia Iunia Bruti]

That he had an affair, while his wife has born his youngest son, show perfectly, how amoral Trump is and how hypocritical the Reps are, if you look at the Lewinsky affair.

[Pontifex Maximus]

So what is your argument, if in fact such a thing actually exists? Why would this Stormy thing jeopardize Trump's presidency? I'm completely unsurprised to find your are incapable of forming an actual cogent argument in opposition.

I'm absolutely not worried by this scandal, I'm amused. I'm amused because people like you believe we should give a flying based upon the precedents set by your own standards.

The Stormy Daniels scandal is irrelevant, change my mind. I may even ignore Ferrets' awful, unconvincing, and embarrassing opening salvo. Trump ed a porn star and then paid her to keep quiet about it. She then breached her contract. Why should this count against Trump? Why should this disqualify him for the Presidency? Give me a moral argument, or any argument.

Though I do look forward to your cogent, reasonable explanation as to why evangelical voters should vote against Trump for his sins in favor of the Democrat party and cast a vote in favor of a democrat who will be inevitably promoting policies opposed to their views, regardless of personal conduct. I won't be ambiguous here: if Trump had paid for someone's abortion, this may gain more traction than the current bad press campaign. In any event, I will continue to entertain myself at every liberal's fundamental misunderstanding of Trump and his draw.

I'll just close with this: thank goodness we have biased, paid off, and in civil breach of contacts those who will expose the already known sexual misconduct of our president to the public even though the conduct was consented to and without any government position coercion whatsoever. All I can say is that Stormy is a saint, a bedrock of our democracy, and without her we would be damned to Trump, a serial rapist, obviously.

Ferrets, your argument is incoherent, inconsistent, unsupported, illogical, simplistic, and biased to the extreme. Do you care to provide any actual sources to support your incredibly tenuous, indeed horrible, arguments? If not, would you care to admit to surrender now? Your party created this whataboutism, I wish we could avoid it all but sadly the intellectually deficient left has demanded we address this issue.

[Morticia Iunia Bruti]

It is simply not normal, that a new father have had an affair, while his wife had at the same moment born his child. In a normal relationship this strenghten the realtionship between man and woman. But not Trump. Spanky cares only about his lust, that show one more time, that he has an extreme narcisstic personality.

And he had admitted meanwhile, that he reimbursed Cohen. Before he lied, that Cohen had not acted in his name. Trump is once more a notorical liar.

Trump has simply not the needed integrity for being president.

[Pontifex Maximus]

It is simply not normal, that a new father have had an affair, while his wife had at the same moment born his child. In a normal relationship this strenghten the realtionship between man and woman. But not Trump. Spanky cares only about his lust, that show one more time, that he has an extreme narcisstic personality.

And he had admitted meanwhile, that he reimbursed Cohen. Before he lied, that Cohen had not acted in his name. Trump is once more a notorical liar.

Trump has simply not the needed integrity for being president.

Wrong, irrelevant, and hypocritical. Every politician has basically done the same thing. Stop trying to hold Trump to standards which no other politician has been held ever. Is this wrong? Yes, it probably is. Who do we have to blame? Democrats.

[Surgeon]

Tbh I didn't realize the Stormy Daniels thing was still going on. I'd assumed everyone already stopped caring 4.323 sec after they heard about it. Is this what I get for not watching cable news?

You know though, maybe this sort of thing should be encouraged. Perhaps they'll tank faster. Not that anything anyone says seems to be getting through to them.

"Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake, unless it's a Democrat because they'll double down no matter what you do really" -- Sun Tzu

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

[Pontifex Maximus]

Never underestimate the democrat urge to rain accolades on porn stars in order to undermine a conservative. I guess.

[Gaidin]

Never underestimate the democrat urge to rain accolades on porn stars in order to undermine a conservative. I guess.

It’s not democrat. Her lawyer is loud and he should have gotten the award if anyone was going to for this.

[Pontifex Maximus]

Why? He has basically breached an SND agreement which is a binding private contract - unless there is some legal argument I'm not aware of?

[irontaino]

Never underestimate the democrat urge to rain accolades on porn stars in order to undermine a conservative. I guess.

The current president was the leading voice of the birther conspiracy, soooooooooo...

[Pontifex Maximus]

The current president was the leading voice of the birther conspiracy, soooooooooo...

Explain why that is relevant? I'm not even denying it. I'm just asking why anyone should care about it.

[irontaino]

Explain why that is relevant? I'm not even denying it. I'm just asking why anyone should care about it.

If you're gonna go on about the lengths one side will go...

[Morticia Iunia Bruti]

Why? He has basically breached an SND agreement which is a binding private contract - unless there is some legal argument I'm not aware of?

Trump didn´t sign it, so not binding i fear.

Its ironic, that the Donaldists want to argue with a binding private treaty, when their president don´t respect international ones.^^

[removeduser_487563287433]

So what is your argument, if in fact such a thing actually exists? Why would this Stormy thing jeopardize Trump's presidency?

It makes him a liar. It makes him immoral. It makes him a user of prostitutes. It demonstrates the hypocrisy of his religious right supporters.

Aaaaaaaaaaand:

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...igarch/559991/

Russian oligarchs provided the money. Why? LETS FIND OUT!

[Pontifex Maximus]

Trump didn´t sign it, so not binding i fear.

Its ironic, that the Donaldists want to argue with a binding private treaty, when their president don´t respect international ones.^^

1. Source?

2. Literally does not meet the legal definition of treaty as I explained to you already.

It makes him a liar. It makes him immoral. It makes him a user of prostitutes. It demonstrates the hypocrisy of his religious right supporters.

Aaaaaaaaaaand:

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...igarch/559991/

Russian oligarchs provided the money. Why? LETS FIND OUT!

So religious people aren't allowed to vote for a candidate which pursues domestic policy they favor if that person has ever committted a sin? You claim to be an expert theologian or something but your understanding of christianity is soreely lacking. I preemptively discarded your inervitably bad argument a few posts ago anyway.

Fun conspiracy theoryby the way I hope it makes all your dreams come true, like disney land.

[Morticia Iunia Bruti]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.3d70de0734b3

For the case, that you will argue, "but but Cohen has signed":

Daniels's lawsuit alleges that “Mr. Trump purposely did not sign the agreement so he could later, if need be, publicly disavow any knowledge of the hush agreement.” That argument makes sense to George M. Cohen (no relation to Trump's lawyer), who teaches contract law at the University of Virginia School of Law. “It's possible that DD declined to sign to preserve deniability later on while [also] preserving the ability to enforce against PP,” said Cohen, adding that Trump might have been “trying to have his cake and eat it.”
“A court might view that intention as insufficient to create an enforceable contract, on the theory that you have to make a choice to be in the contract, with obligations binding on you, as well, or not,” Cohen said.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.3d70de0734b3

[Pontifex Maximus]

Yeah I'm not turning this into a second Russian collusion thread.

[Aexodus]

It’s interesting how some people see a porn star who has sex for a living as some sort of moral crusader against evil God-Emperor Trump. That’s a good facebook page, btw.

I think we discovered that voters don’t care about this kind of stuff from years before the presidency, when they still elected him despite the ‘grab em by the pussy’ thing. No-one cares but the media, and as Surgeon put it:

Tbh I didn't realize the Stormy Daniels thing was still going on. I'd assumed everyone already stopped caring 4.323 sec after they heard about it. Is this what I get for not watching cable news?

You know though, maybe this sort of thing should be encouraged. Perhaps they'll tank faster. Not that anything anyone says seems to be getting through to them.

"Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake, unless it's a Democrat because they'll double down no matter what you do really" -- Sun Tzu

[Heathen Hammer]

If some pro-GOP city honored that kid who was stalked and threatened by CNN for making that WWE gif with Trump, we'd probably never hear then end of that.