Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567
Results 121 to 124 of 124

Thread: Conflict in the East [2vs2 HS] Good vs Evil

  1. #121
    joerock22's Avatar Leader of Third Age HS
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    4,928

    Default Re: Conflict in the East [2vs2 HS] Good vs Evil


  2. #122

    Default Re: Conflict in the East [2vs2 HS] Good vs Evil

    CS sent

  3. #123

    Default Re: Conflict in the East [2vs2 HS] Good vs Evil

    Cowcow seems to be gone for good, I let the dissicion to you.
    - Be declared the winner
    - Continue against me to see if you indeed could have won.

  4. #124
    joerock22's Avatar Leader of Third Age HS
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    4,928

    Default Re: Conflict in the East [2vs2 HS] Good vs Evil

    Well, it's unfortunate, but I don't think it's fair to ask you to continue on his behalf. This hotseat originally had four players and three left, so I suppose I win by being the "last man standing," so to speak. Thank you (and +rep) King of Dawn for the admin work.

    My read of the strategic situation: Evil was winning. We had taken Araw and Grasgard, killed Bard and his army, and had the Good forces pinned to the northeast. Then my ally carelessly lost Margoz and his army, which changed everything. That allowed the Dwarves to push us back, penetrate Rhun's defenses and forcing the Easterlings to defend on two fronts. But the situation has stabilized. We gave up a few minor settlements in the interest of solidifying our defense. Rhun had recovered, and Mordor was bringing in reinforcements. So I think I had about a 50/50 chance of winning. It probably would have come down to who would make the first big mistake.

Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •