Not true at all in some contexts. While this may be *trueish* in let's say, the lands controlled by the high nobility (and even then only up to a time), there were actual laws for sections of the population to own a crossbow. In a case I know very well, Portugal, this was the very lowest class, lower than even owning the equipment to arm oneself as a line spearman. Of course, there was a further class of semi-professional crossbowmen that were much more highly regarded, but still.
As for the Andalusian context, I will tend to agree with you - they do definitely seem to be people of a certain wealth either mounted or not. They appear to own crossbows (with no stirrups on them when used mounted, stirrup and hook on foot) conical helmets/cervellieres/coifs/phrygians, horses, ornate saddles, short corselets of mail, scale, padding or a composite of all these. Can't find any with a sidearm for the life of me though.
A sort of levy crossbow wouldn't be out of place though, at least in the Peninsula.
Thank you for the reply:
There seems to be a lot of spearmen with almost exclusively round shields going around, so that's why I asked. And maybe that was also what made me put forward other suggestions. It'd be interesting to see a heavier western influence on the Andalusian heavy infantry much like it's represented on the Cantigas de Santa Maria - western style helmets, shields and armor combined with Islamic iconography. Also, tabards seem to have been much preferred over the uncovered mail (though there are examples), and quite relatable if you've ever been in a mail suit under a 40ºC sun. There's also loads of occasions when they seem to be wearing more than one type of armor at the same time, like short sleeved scale over mail, short sleeved scale over fabric, padding over mail, shot sleeved scale over padding, etc...point being, if possible show the various layers. Oh, also, battle-axes.
To be fair, everything south of the Tagus was heavily or thoroughly islamized until reconquered by the Christian kingdoms. Militarily speaking though, even after converting, they seemed to have followed the early Arab and western traditions, valuing heavy infantry much more than the guys over the straits which relied on the more cliche jinete. This, up to a point in history of course.
I'm interested to see what you're going to do with the high period units, with Ibn Al-Kathib mentioning the adoption of actually
lighter equipment by Andalusian heavy cavalry. I'll also be interested if you're gonna go with the Nasrids or the Marinids to get a proper analogue.
Maybe add an elite black foot guard, and just put the general in with what he was escorted by at Las Navas de Tolosa, namely his and the personal retinues of his main governors, namely Granada, Seville, Jáen and Cordoba?
Great on the writing.
A few more points:
- Granadine knights might need *some* caparisons, chamfrons, mail for the horses? Or am I just not understanding the difference between them and the Muwalladun, which almost look like cataphracts? Also, there's a typically Iberian heater shield model, they're shown using as well.
- Granadine cavalry (which represent medium Andalusian cavalry?) should have spears as a primary, IMO. It's *the most* represented weapon of any muslim cavalryman, light or not.
- Also, I would say, don't be afraid to experiment with typically Moroccan/Arab patterns for the more wealthy of the units. Also attested by the Cantigas.
- Slingers? Staff-Slingers?