Nice Google search there. It is better if you do this kind of research from the get go instead of jumping to any source regardless of how questionable they are while trying to pass them off as some kind of the the authority... The Flanders Marine Institute's interpretation ignores other principles of UNCLOS, such as the equity, and decisions of various arbitration processes. Hence, it's incomplete.
Atun was not a decision maker. He was supposedly part of a delegate. A map produced years after he had that job (which we don't really have the context of) doesn't really carry much weight as much as you like it to be. In reality, you don't really have a map of what Turkey ultimately wants.
Continuing to ignore real arbitration on a similar situation, I see. It's quite unfortunate that you have to depend on ignoring facts to keep your narrative alive.
The petroleum firms couldn't give two
about the legality of where they drill. They know very well that they'll likely continue their operation no matter what is the outcome.
Why Turkey didn't take Greece to court? Because they expressly stated that they wanted a bilateral agreement between two parties rather than a third party dictating what should be done.