Originally Posted by
Haddon
You keep saying this, this "makes more business sense" because more people are playing Rome 2, but you are missing a key thing I have pointed out repeatedly; the Roman era, from mid-Republic to ~Constantine or so, is WAY WAY more popular than the fall of Rome. People are playing the ERA more than the GAME, I think.
I read this to mean quite possibly a second grand campaign, just like they did for Rome 2, to breathe new life into Attila. Rome 2 was faltering like hell when they made the Imperium update, fixed quite a few things and brought some much needed life to the game. I think it makes much more business sense to attempt the same on Attila, rather than add a DLC for a game 5 years old.