Re: HISTORICAL NEW CONTENT TEAM - Analysis of the Soldier
CA's plans are mostly determined by the popularity of each historical period, and, to put it frankly, very few people are even remotely interested in the Marcomannic Wars of Marcus Aurelius, despite being briefly depicted in The Gladiator movie. A part of the shield symbol has been copied from the Cherusci faction of Rome II, but I doubt that the figure is Arminius, because Teutoburg Forest isn't very well-known either, while CA has already released a very similar campaign game, Caesar in Gaul. The equipment is clearly not historical, but, in my opinion, the Roman armor intentionally points towards a minor indication of Roman heritage. Most probably, that extravagantly dressed barbarian is supposed to represent a Celto-Roman warlord, perhaps Arthur himself. An expansion for Attila makes sense, because it has been better received than its predecessor by the community, while the legend of King Arthur and the Holy Grail is the only remaining popular event closely related to Attila's timeframe. Fighting the Marcomanni or the Palmyrene Empire as Aurelius and Aurelian respectively is definitely fun, but I doubt it has the same potential of generating sales as Arthur.