I don't know how interesting this will be, but as a follow up to the stickied poll above, I ask which method for believing in your conclusions is primary to you. This isn't a debate about which way is superior (both are flawed), rather its for us to share which is primary and a little about why, but really examine yourself before posting. Anyone can participate, of course. I'll go first.
I'm a traditionalist. Reason is secondary, or tertiary, in my faith. According to the Ety Online Dictionary, religion is loaned from the French religare, which formed after the Latin, meaning "to bind doubly over;" my religion is a double bond, to God and to man. I don't want to be "my own man," which is a slippery and dangerous conceit, where reason is primary in faith. This faith was trusted to me, indelibly linking me to my forebears, and making me who I am. I wouldn't have it any other way.