I was so shocked at reading such a post that I went through your post history to understand why you were so bitter.
A piece of constructive criticism - when engaging in these types of dialogue, your aim should be to bring your reader around to your view. So far (in all the examples I can see), you've (a) stated a position, (b) provided no basis for your position and instead elected to attack the position of others, (c) thrown a tantrum when nobody agrees with you and degraded the conversation to personal attacks. None of your strategy will lend your argument any weight, and honestly it comes across as a really ugly way to conduct yourself on a public forum.
I have no doubt that you have ideas of value to add, you just need to find a more diplomatic way of expressing them and engaging other participants in civilised discussion.
On another note, it strikes me that Rhodes still feels somewhat "unfinished". I know I've seen posts here and there discussing some changes (in particular, I liked the idea that less emphasis was to be placed on slingers and more on naval combat), and just wondered if the dev team are contemplating a minor refresh at this stage, or if it isn't yet on the to-do list?