ModDB page has misleading instructions

**Gigantus** · February 19, 2017, 07:44 PM

I just finished trouble shooting a query on Steam which ultimately pointed to a misleading instruction on ModDB

Originally Posted by ModDB instructions

Requirements:
- TATW 3.2 is a stand-alone version and does not require any existing installations of TATW!
- If you have installed a previous version of TATW (2.1 or older), it is recommended to delete the old version before installing TATW 3.2.
(Note that TATW doesn't change any registry settings of your system, so you can also delete the old TATW folder "Third_Age" manually.)
- TATW 3.2 requires the 'Medieval 2 - Kingdoms Expansion' and is compatible with the official patch 1.04 and 1.05. (One installed campaign of the 'Kingdoms Expansion' is enough)

It would seem that it is a copy\paste from the 3.0 instructions - can the team please correct this?

**Dutch-Balrog** · February 20, 2017, 07:46 PM

This has been like that for forever and i doubt it's gonna change anytime soon lol.

**Gigantus** · February 20, 2017, 08:14 PM

Considering that 3.2 was released ages ago that is a given - just curious why it has never been brought to the attention of the team.

**Dutch-Balrog** · February 21, 2017, 06:31 AM

I think it has, but i think only KK really had controll over the page and who knows where he is these days.

**Ngugi** · February 21, 2017, 07:31 AM

The 'LMs' can, so if they're contacted and provided the info they can update the instructions (as they did when they removed patch 3.1).

**Gigantus** · February 21, 2017, 08:53 AM

I sent a PM to all listed local moderators earlier, let's see if one of them can do the change.

**Ngugi** · February 21, 2017, 09:33 AM

Meant at ModDB, just to be clear (see I wasen't)

**Gigantus** · February 21, 2017, 09:51 AM

Think you could arrange to contact them at ModDB?

**Ngugi** · February 21, 2017, 10:27 AM

I'm no longer in an official position, but Vet or EK perhaps may use support@moddb.com
or log in and use this channel: http://www.moddb.com/contact

**Veteraan** · February 21, 2017, 02:28 PM

I could probably try that, but if having an "official position" is the key to success, then Gig himself is the prime candidate IMO.

**Ngugi** · February 21, 2017, 03:22 PM

Honestly anyone ought to point it out to effect, as it's beneficial for the player/visitor base, but merely think that a verifiable [local] moderator for the TATW forum [on TWC], presenting himself, is sooner taken seriously than most others hehe.
Presume I would value a proposal sooner then, was I a staff member who might not be invested in the what's what over here