In addition to these rules the game will be adhering strictly to historical accuracy in the political systems of the late Roman Republic. While an extensive knowledge of Roman history is not required to play this game, it may be beneficial to occasionally look things up on Wikipedia or ask questions if you are confused. The game will be moderated as if everyone knows basic things such as the term length, powers, and role of the Consul – to name one example.
The nature of political power in the late Republic was constantly in a state of flux. Writing down specific powers and abilities therefore seems rather to defeat the point. Players will be given a reasonable amount of flexibility in their actions, so long as these actions fall within a reasonable historical framework.
The Roman "Constitution" was not written and was constantly evolving. The most succinct way to describe it is as the "mos maiorum" (the way of the ancestors). Characters in the game may alter the way of the ancestors/constitution by gradual evolution. The more extreme the departure from precedent, the more likely one is to be met with NPC opposition. Opposition is not impossible to overcome. Players will be responsible for knowing what is or is not falling outside the line of tradition and may consult other players for advice, or outside sources. Here are some quick tips:
-traditionally, no Roman was able to carry weapons within the pomerium (the city center). Recently agitators have been carrying quills and using them as knives to intimidate political opponents in the Forum. Benches have also been broken up and used as weapons to kill political enemies.
-Roman armies are forbidden from entering the city unless to celebrate a triumph
-Senators adhere strictly to the cursus honorum to the point it is treated as veritable binding law among the senatorial classes.
Economy
[/SPOILER]
Battle Rules
Clandestine Assassination
This type occurs when a victim least expects it and is carried out by anonymous individuals. D20 rolls will govern assassination attempts:
1-4 = successful assassination
4-12 = unsuccessful assassination
12-16 = unsuccessful assassination and evidence left behind
16-20 = unsuccessful assassination and identity becomes known
Open Assassination
This assassination type is publicm the identity of the assassins is known
1-8 = successful assassination
8-20 = unsuccessful assassination
Assassinations within the home
Any type of assassination within the home gains a +2 modifier to the rolls. The host will be a suspect, even if no evidence is left behind.
In your own home
4/20 for successful capture
In someone else’s' home (by the host)
15/20
In a public space
10/20
Pro-Consular Rules
Province Edict System
Once a Proconsul is in his province, he may select two edicts from two of the following branches (for a total of four edicts) to remain active for the year.
Military Branch
1. -15% legionary recruitment
2. -15% legionary upkeep
3. -50% legionary retinue cost
4. Recruit local Legatus (general with random traits)
5. -15% Naval recruitment Costs
6. -15% Naval upkeep costs
Economic Branch: Exploitation
Taking any of these action will reduce provincial good will*
1. +15% income
2. D20 x 100 added income
3. +25% income
4. D20 x 200 local auxilia conscripted (varies by region)
5. -10% building costs
6. D20 x 500 income
*Provincial goodwill refers to the love the people of the province bear you. If you exploit them, your influence will decrease. If you govern well, they will appreciate your efforts. The more loyal a province to an individual, the more benefits a person can extract from the provinces later on. One example is fleeing to the province for sanctuary.
The number selected will be the number deducted from your “good will” points. These points will be measured against the points of others in the same province to determine overall influence.
This is not an exhaustive list. Propose an action in the game and ask for a moderator’s opinion of what it Is worth.
Economic Branch: Investment
This branch increases province good will in the corresponding number as outlined above.
1. -10% income
2. -20% income
3. Construct a tier I building for public works
4. Raise a legion from the province
5. Construct a tier II building for public works
6. Construct a tier III building for public works
This is not an exhaustive list. Propose an action in the game and ask for a moderator’s opinion of what it Is worth.
Provincial Capitals are as follows:
Italy: Rome (Italia I, Nota bene: pleb and patrician point systems govern this area. The region of Italia I is exempt from this system)
Spain: Carhtago Nova (Tarraconensis VI)
Africa: Carthage (Africa Proconsularis I)
Greece: Athens (Acheae I)
Gaul: Massalia (Nabonensis I)
NPC Interactions
A base chance of success for all NPC Interactions are 0/20. Modifiers will be added but it is the responsibility of the player to explain why modifiers to be added as well as recommend the number of modifiers. The final ruling is up to moderator discretion.
A character may ask for virtually any sort of roll ranging from the incitement of mob violence to the use of an NPC tribune in order to veto legislation. In the event of some RP events started by characters, players may eventually gain complete control of some NPCs (such as a tribune). This "sub-character" may be officially adopted as a main character in some cases but a player may only have quasi control over the character, the nature of the relationship of the "sub-character" will be that of patron and client with the main senator instigating the NPC action. "Sub-characters" may not have traits or income but they can marry and be attached to armies.
Forum Structure:
I. Urbs Romanum (The political epicenter of the Republic)
II. Vicinia Romanum (The residences of prominent citizens and markets)
III. Provincias (The political centers of the provinces)
IV. The Field of Mars (Battles)
V. Res Historiarum (Archives)
Last edited by Pontifex Maximus; September 21, 2016 at 03:27 PM.
Pontifex Maximus
Rhapture
Brewster
Okmin
Pinkerton
Families
Cornelii Sullae - Closed Family
Publius Cornelius Sulla Patrician
Ranks: Paterfamilias, Senator
Economic Branch: Agriculture
Current Office: n/a
Age: 40
Traits: Wealth +2, Battle +1, Survival +1
Publius Cornelius Sulla served as quaestor during the Consulship of Gaius Marius (100 BCE) and tribunus militum during the Consulship of Cnaeus Domitius Ahenobarbus (96 BCE). He was present at the defeat of the Cimbrii but played only minor roles in that engagement. Upon returning to Rome he stood for the Praetorship in the Consulship of Crassus and Scaevola (95 BCE and lost. As a Roman of the traditional sort, he will continue to advance himself in the usual ways as well as his son. Publius is married to the daughter of Gaius Furius Sulpicianus.
Sextus Cornelius Sulla Ranks: Homo novus
Current Office: N/a
Age: 20
Traits: +2 wealth
Sextus has finished his formal schooling and as such will begin his political career with lower level magistracies and posts. He must also soon take a wife.
Cornelia
Age: 16
Traits: +1 Survival
The eldest daughter of Publius Cornelius Sulla
Furii Sulpicianii - Open Family
Gaius Furius Sulpicianus PlebeianRanks: Paterfamilias, Senator
Economic Branch: Landlord
Current Office: n/a
Age: 35
Traits: Wealth +2, Charisma +2
Gaius served as quaestor during the consulship of Crassus and Lentulus and since then has been heavily involved in the courts. He has represented many men and although some end up convicted, he never fails to please the crowd with his oratorical skills. Gaius' daughter is married to Publius Cornelius Sulla, cementing an alliance between the two families.
Sulpicia Age: 15
Traits: +1 survival
The eldest daughter of Gaius Sulpicianus.
Herrenia
Age: 30
Traits: Survival +3
The wife of Gaius Sulpicianus.
Maps
Alright, as soon as I get seven people to express interest I'll request a forum and get this show on the road.
The Cimbri were a tribe from Northern Europe, who, together with the Teutones and the Ambrones threatened the Roman Republic in the late 2nd century BC. The Cimbri were probably Germanic, though some believe them to be of Celtic origin. The ancient sources located their original home in Jutland, in present-day Denmark, which was referred to as the Cimbrian peninsula throughout antiquity.
The Teutons or Teutones were mentioned as a Germanic tribe by Greek and Roman authors, notably Strabo and Marcus Velleius Paterculus and normally in close connection with the Cimbri, whose ethnicity is contested between Gauls and Germani. According to Ptolemy's map, they lived in Jutland, in agreement with Pomponius Mela, who placed them in Scandinavia.
The Suebi are an extremely warlike German tribe bordering Gaul. Although normally hemmed into the interior of Germany by the Rhine River, groups of raiders are known to pillage Gaul from time to time. This has made the Gauls fearful of the German tribes who they consider to be nothing more than seasonal invaders.
The Frisii are a mysterious tribe hailing from the interior of Germany. Although almost constantly at war with neighbors, the Frisii are increasingly looking to find a new homeland with weaker neighbors, better land, and a better climate.
The Marcomanni are a tribe from the interior of Germany closely related to but enemies of the Frisii. Their main goal is t annex Frisii territory into their own and make the Frisii their slaves.
Quadi
Relationship Status: Hostile Allies: Rivals:
Chief: Areogaesus
A mysterious, uncontacted tribe from the German interior
Gothones
Relationship Status: Hostile Allies: Rivals:
Chief: Athanaric
The ancestors of the Goths that would one day sack Rome, they have slowly immigrated from their homeland in Scandanavia and populating all of Eastern Europe.
Aedui, Haedui or Hedui , were a Gallic people of Gallia Lugdunensis, who inhabited the country between the Arar (Saône) and Liger (Loire), in today's France. They are the main power-brokers in Gaul after the defeat of the Arverni and Allobroges.
Arverni
Relationship Status: Conquered Allies: Rivals:
Chief: Vercingetorix
The Arverni were a Gallic tribe living in what is now the Auvergne region of France during the last centuries BC. One of the most powerful tribes in ancient Gaul, they opposed the Romans on several occasions. Their most important stronghold was Gergovia, near the present-day commune of Clermont-Ferrand. Before the Roman Conquest they were an extremely powerful tribe, perhaps the dominant tribe in all of Gaul. Their leader Vercingetorix may be planning a larger revolt...
The Carnutes, a powerful Celtic people in the heart of independent Gaul, dwelled in a particularly extensive territory between the Sequana (Seine) and the Liger (Loire) rivers. Their lands later corresponded to the dioceses of Chartres, Orléans and Blois, that is, the greater part of the modern departments of Eure-et-Loir, Loiret and Loir-et-Cher. The territory of the Carnutes had the reputation among Roman observers of being the political and religious center of the Gaulish nations.
Sequani, in ancient geography, were a Gallic people who occupied the upper river basin of the Arar (Saône), the valley of the Doubs and the Jura Mountains, their territory corresponding to Franche-Comté and part of Burgundy. They are the main rivals to the Aedui and have relations with the Germanic Suebi.
The Allobroges were a Celtic tribe of ancient Gaul, located between the Rhône River and the Lake of Geneva in what later became Savoy, Dauphiné, and Vivarais. Their cities were in the areas of modern-day Annecy, Chambéry and Grenoble, the modern departement of Isère, and modern Switzerland. Their capital was today's Vienne. They have been conquered but do not easily tolerate Roman Rule.
The Belgae were a group of tribes living in northern Gaul, on the west bank of the Rhine, in the 3rd century BC, and later also in Britain. They gave their name to the Roman province of Gallia Belgica, and later, to the modern country of Belgium. They have a reputation for being ferocious warriors, some going naked into combat.
The Veneti inhabited southern Armorica, along the Morbihan bay. They built their strongholds on coastal eminences, which were islands when the tide was in, and peninsulas when the tide was out. Their most notable city, and probably their capital, was Darioritum (now known as Gwened in Breton or Vannes in French), mentioned in Ptolemy's Geography.
The Veneti built their ships of oak with large transoms fixed by iron nails of a thumb's thickness. They navigated and powered their ships through the use of leather sails. This made their ships strong, sturdy and structurally sound, capable of withstanding harsh condition of the Atlantic.
Aquitani
Relationship Status: Neutral Allies: Rivals:
Chiefs: Brennus
The Aquitani (Latin for Aquitanians) were a people living in what is now Aquitaine, France, in the region between the Pyrenees, the Atlantic ocean and the Garonne. Julius Cæsar, who defeated them in his campaign in Gaul, describes them as making up a distinct part of Gaul:
The Helvetii were a Celtic tribe or tribal confederation[2] occupying most of the Swiss plateau at the time of their contact with the Roman Republic in the 1st century BC. According to Julius Caesar, the Helvetians were divided into four subgroups or pagi. Of these Caesar only names the Verbigeni and the Tigurini.
They are currently under heavy pressure by the Marcomanni and other Germanic tribes. There are rumors of a migration.
The Lusitanians (or Lusitani in Latin) were an Indo-European people living in the Western Iberian Peninsula long before it became the Roman province of Lusitania (modern Portugal, Extremadura and a small part of Salamanca). They spoke the Lusitanian language, and were either of Celtic origin or else became Celticized over time. The modern Portuguese people see the Lusitanians living in the western Iberian peninsula as their ancestors. The most notable Lusitanian was Viriathus. From him, the Lusitani became adept guerilla fighters, troubling Rome for decades.
The Celtiberians were Celtic-speaking people of the Iberian Peninsula in the final centuries BC. The group used the Celtic Celtiberian language.
The Celtiberians were the most influential ethnic group in pre-Roman Iberia, but they had their largest impact on history during the Second Punic War, during which they became the (perhaps unwilling) allies of Carthage in its conflict with Rome, and crossed the Alps in the mixed forces under Hannibal's command. As a result of the defeat of Carthage, the Celtiberians first submitted to Rome in 195 BC; Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus spent the years 182 to 179 pacifying (as the Romans put it) the Celtiberians; however, conflicts between various semi-independent bands of Celtiberians continued.
Cantabri
Relationship Status: Neutral Allies: Rivals:
Chief: Corocotta
The Celtiberians were Celtic-speaking people of the Iberian Peninsula in the final centuries BC. The group used the Celtic Celtiberian language.
Like most ancient Spanish peoples, the exact origins of the Cantabri are obscure and subjected to debate since Antiquity. According to the Greek geographer Strabo, the Cantabrians were formerly called Lusitanians, whilst Julius Caesar states they were an indigenous people, whom he describes as being related (relatives) to the Aquitani people of southwestern Gaul, casting some doubt on the alleged Celticity of this nation. Curiously, the name ‘Cantabri’ is a word of Ligurian origin meaning ‘Mountaineers’ or ‘Highlanders’, and therefore this people may have been known by a different designation prior to the arrival of the Romans. They were clearly very mixed, and judging by their tribal names, included eleven or so tribes of Ligurian, Aquitanian, Indo-Aryan, Celtiberian and Gallic affiliation.
The meteoric rise of Dacia is due to its King Burebista.
Burebista led a policy of conquest of new territories: in 60/59 BC, he attacked and vanquished the Celtic tribes of Boii and Taurisci, who dwelt along the Middle Danube and in what is now Slovakia. After 55 BC and probably before 48 BC, Burebista conquers the Black Sea shore, subjugating the Greek fortresses from Olbia to Apollonia, as well as the Danubian Plain all the way to the Balkans. Strabo also mentions the expeditions against a group of Celts who lived among the Thracians and Illyrians (probably the Scordisci).
The only Greek polis with which Burebista had good relations was Dionysopolis. According to an inscription found in this city, Akornion, a citizen of the city was a chief adviser of Burebista.
At its peak of power, the empire of Burebista streched from modern Slovakian Carpathians to the Balkans and from the Middle Danube to the Black Sea. Strabo claims that the Getae could raise up to 200,000 soldiers in wartime, a rather improbable number, but which could represent the total number of able males, not the number of any army. Burebista was a worthy adversary for the Romans, as his army would cross the Danube and plunder the Roman towns as far as in Thrace, Macedonia and Illyria.
In 48 BC, Burebista sided with Pompey during his struggle against Julius Caesar in the Roman civil war, sending Akornion as an ambassador and a military adviser. After Caesar emerged as victor, he planned on sending legions to punish Burebista, but he was assassinated in the Senate before he could do so, on March 15, 44 BC.
Dardani
Relationship Status: Neutral Allies: Rivals:
King: Bato
Dardanians were Thraco-Illyrian barbarians and a constant threat to the Macedonian kingdom. When Philip V rose to the Macedonian throne skirmishing with Dardanians began in 220-219 BC and he managed to capture Bylazora from them in 217 BC. Skirmishes continued in 211 and in 209 when a force of Dardanians under Aeropus, probably a pretender to the Macedonian throne, captured Lychnidus and looted Macedonia taking 20.000 prisoners and retreating before Philip's forces could reach them. In 201 Bato of Dardania along with Pleuratus the Illyrian and Amynander king of Athamania, cooperated with Roman consul Sulpicius in his expedition against Philip V. Being always under the menace of Dardanian attacks on Macedonia, around 183 BC Philip V made an alliance with Bastarnae and invited them to settle in Polog, the region of Dardania closest to Macedonia. A joint campaign of Bastarnae and Macedonians against Dardanians was organized but Philip V died and Perseus of Macedon withdrew its forces from the campaign. Bastarnae crossed the Danube in huge numbers and although they didn't met the Macedonians, they continued the campaign. Some 30,000 Bastarnae under the command of Clondicus, seems to have defeated the Dardanians but eventually they returned home and the plan of Philip V failed. In 177 BC, Dardanians sent an report to Roman Senate, accusing Perseus of Macedon for being again in alliance with Bastarnae against Dardanians, but the Roman investigating commission failed to find support for such accusations.
In 88 BC, they invaded the Roman province of Macedonia together with the Scordisci and the Maedi.
Archaeology and onomastic shows that the Delmatae were akin to eastern Illyrians and northern Pannonii. Delmatae were a younger nomadic[citation needed] tribe in ancient Illyria (West Balkans); they emerged there since 4th century BC, partly repulsing from their area the earlier peoples of Liburni westwards, Daorsi and Ardiaei (Vardaei) eastwards. They were formed as a tribal alliance[citation needed] of culturally similar communities in 4th-3rd century BC, like the Tariotes and the others. The tribe was subject to Celtic influences.[6][7].One of the Dalmatian tribes was called Baridustae that later was settled in Roman Dacia.
The archeological remnants suggest their material culture was more primitive than this one of the surrounding ancient tribes, especially in comparison with the oldest Liburnians. Only their production of weapons was rather advanced. Their elite had the build stone houses only, but numerous Delmatic herdmen yet settled in natural caves, and a characteristic detail in their usual clothing was the fur cap.
Their nomadic society had a strong patriarchal structure, consisting chiefly of shepherds, warriors and their chieftains. Their main jobs had been the extensive cattle breeding, and the iterative plundering of other surrounding tribes and of coastal towns at Adriatic. The early independent Delmatae had been completely illiterate, and the first inscriptions there appeared since the Roman conquest.
There were some iterative Roman conflicts with the Delmatae lasting for 160 years. The main reason was the perpetual aggressiveness of nomadic Delmatae against all their neighbours and also towards the Issaean federation, Greek-led Roman allies in central Adriatic islands, and so their pacification appeared inevitable. Delmatae land was mostly a rocky calcareous country with many pathless mountains, ideal for infinite guerilla wars; thus Delmatae erected there about 400 stony forteresses and 50 major citadels against Romans.
Pannonians was a common name for a group of culturally similar tribes cognate to Illyrians, who inhabited the southern part of what was later known as Roman province of Pannonia, south of the river Drava (Dravus), and the northern part of the future Roman province of Dalmatia. The Pannonian tribes appear to have been Celticized. Later a number of Pannonians settled in Dacia.
In the 2nd century BC, the Segestani, one of the Pannonian tribes inhabiting the area around Segestica (modern Sisak in Croatia), were attacked without lasting success by consuls Lucius Aurelius Cotta and an unidentified Cornelius. In 35 BC, the Segestani were attacked by Augustus, who conquered and occupied Siscia (Sisak). The rest of the Pannonians were not, however, definitely subdued until 9 BC, when their lands were incorporated into the province of Illyricum after the Great Illyrian Revolt, conducted by the future emperor Tiberius.
A loose confederation of Thracian tribes follows Coty I from his capital in Seuthopolis. Thrace is a backwater nation, its glory greatly diminished from the days of Lysamichus. Thracian warriors are however still of great renown and employ themselves throughout the known world.
The Parthian Empire (247 BC – 224 AD), also known as the Arsacid Empire, was a major Iranian political and cultural power in ancient Persia.[2] Its latter name comes from Arsaces I of Parthia who, as leader of the Parni tribe, founded it in the mid-3rd century BC when he conquered the Parthia region[4] in Iran's northeast, then a satrapy (province) in rebellion against the Seleucid Empire. Mithridates I of Parthia (r. c. 171–138 BC) greatly expanded the empire by seizing Media and Mesopotamia from the Seleucids. At its height, the Parthian Empire stretched from the northern reaches of the Euphrates, in what is now south-eastern Turkey, to eastern Iran. The empire, located on the Silk Road trade route between the Roman Empire in the Mediterranean Basin and Han Empire of China, became a center of trade and commerce.
The Parthians largely adopted the art, architecture, religious beliefs, and royal insignia of their culturally heterogeneous empire, which encompassed Persian, Hellenistic, and regional cultures. For about the first half of its existence, the Arsacid court adopted elements of Greek culture, though it eventually saw a gradual revival of Iranian traditions. The Arsacid rulers were titled the "King of Kings", as a claim to be the heirs to the Achaemenid Empire; indeed, they accepted many local kings as vassals where the Achaemenids would have had centrally appointed, albeit largely autonomous, satraps. The court did appoint a small number of satraps, largely outside Iran, but these satrapies were smaller and less powerful than the Achaemenid potentates. With the expansion of Arsacid power, the seat of central government shifted from Nisa, Turkmenistan to Ctesiphon along the Tigris (south of modern Baghdad, Iraq), although several other sites also served as capitals.
The earliest enemies of the Parthians were the Seleucids in the west and the Scythians in the east. However, as Parthia expanded westward, they came into conflict with the Kingdom of Armenia, and eventually the late Roman Republic.
The present high status of Armenia is solely due to its King.
Tigranes the Great was emperor of Armenia under whom the country became, for a short time, the strongest state east of the Roman Republic. He was a member of the Artaxiad Royal House. Under his reign, the Armenian kingdom expanded beyond its traditional boundaries, allowing Tigranes to claim the title Great King, and involving Armenia in many battles against opponents such as the Parthian and Seleucid empires, and the Roman Republic.
Pontus
Relationship Status: Neutral Allies: Rivals:
King: Mithradates VII
The term did come to apply to a separate state after the establishment of the Kingdom of Pontus, beyond the Halys River (Kızıl river). The Persian dynasty which was to found this kingdom had during the fourth century BC ruled the Greek city of Cius (or Kios) in Mysia, with its first known member being Ariobarzanes I of Cius and the last ruler based in the city being Mithridates II of Cius. Mithridates II's son, also called Mithridates, would become Mithridates I Ktistes of Pontus ("Ktistes" meaning "The Founder").
During the troubled period following the death of Alexander the Great, Mithridates Ktistes was for a time in the service of Antigonus, one of Alexander's successors, and successfully maneuvering in this unsettled time managed, shortly after 302 BC, to create the Kingdom of Pontus which would be ruled by his descendants mostly bearing the same name, until 64 BC. Thus, this Persian dynasty managed to survive and prosper in the Hellenistic world while the main Persian Empire had fallen.
As the greater part of this kingdom lay within the immense region of Cappadocia, which in early ages extended from the borders of Cilicia to the Euxine (Black Sea), the kingdom as a whole was at first called "Cappadocia towards the Pontus", but afterwards simply "Pontus," the name Cappadocia being henceforth restricted to the southern half of the region previously included under that title.
This kingdom reached its greatest height under Mithridates VI or Mithradates Eupator, commonly called the Great, who for many years carried on war with the Romans. Under him, the realm of Pontus included not only Pontic Cappadocia but also the seaboard from the Bithynian frontier to Colchis, part of inland Paphlagonia, and Lesser Armenia.
The Hasmonean Kingdom of the Jews
The Hasmonean Kingdom of the Jews ממלכת החשמונאים Mamlekheth haHash'mona'im
Head of State: Hyrcanus II Religion: Judaism Capital: Jerusalem Relationship Status: Neutral Allies: Rivals:
The moderate faction comprises the majority of Jewish citizenry and society into its numbers. Its principle aims are to continue honoring its ancient and existing religious traditions, as well as to establish itself as an independent and sovereign state. Historically, the Jews appealed to the Roman Senate, first in the Maccabean Revolts against the Seleucids, and later, to Gnaeus Pompey Magnus, personally, for aid against the Nabateans besieging Jerusalem.
Ideologies consistent with the Moderates are those of the Sadducees and the Essenes. The former are generally the aristocratic "Old Believers" of Judaism who reject the Pharisaic notion of the "Oral Torah" that is held by most Modern Jews, as well as the authority of scribes and sages, known as Rabbis. They prefer the established traditions of the priestly class that date back to Zadok, the High Priest appointed by King Solomon, circa 1000 BCE. The Essenes, on the other hand, are an ascetic sect that generally refuses to sacrifice at the Temple in Jerusalem. They feel that through Good Deeds, personal oaths, and ascetism, they can practice their mystical form of Judaism. The Essenes eschew voluntary poverty, chastity, and pacifism, and thus are largely apolitical, and congregate around the Dead Sea in the community of Qumran.
Opinion: Warm
Desires:
Trade
Alliance
Good Relations No Opinion:
Vassalization
Hellenization Opposes:
Annexation
Enforcement of Religion
Although small in number, this particular group has the potential to grow the most. Originally, under the rule of the Seleucids, many Jews sought to aid their chances of social mobility and economic prowess by adopting the simpler and more libertine life of a Greek. Many removed the marks of the infamous act of circumcision, while other shaved their beards and adopted Greek clothing. Many attended Gymnasiums, at Greek food, and even worshipped Greek gods. This vast influx of Greek culture was a contributing factor in the devastating Maccabean Revolt, and many Hellenic Jews were either expelled or killed by their zealous compatriots.
However, as Roman dominance is beginning to emerge over the Eastern Mediterranean, it might be within Rome's best interests to encourage the Hellenization of Jews to further integrate them into the Empire.
Opinion: Very Good
Desires:
Trade
Annexation
Good Relations
Hellenization No Opinion:
Vassalization
Annexation
Enforcement of Religion Opposes:
Although small in number, this particular group has the potential to flash out into a major revolt. While most Jews are generally moderates, it is well known that the largest religious group in the Jewish community, the Pharisees, were staunch supporters of the Maccabean revolt, with Judas Maccabeus likely being one himself. The Zealots often went to extreme lengths to fight Hellenization, to the point of destroying Hellenic structures and cities.
Opinion: Poor
Desires:
Independence No Opinion:
Alliance
Trade
Good Relations Opposes:
Annexation
Vassalization
Enforcement of Religion
The Ptolemaic Dynasty of Egypt
Relationship Status: Friendly
Treaties: Pharaoh: Ptolemy XIV and Cleopatra VII Allies: Rivals:
The Ptolemaic Kingdom in and around Egypt began following Alexander the Great's conquest in 332 BC and ended with the death of Cleopatra VII and the Roman conquest in 30 BC. It was founded when Ptolemy I Soter declared himself Pharaoh of Egypt, creating a powerful Hellenistic state stretching from southern Syria to Cyrene and south to Nubia. Alexandria became the capital city and a center of Greek culture and trade. To gain recognition by the native Egyptian populace, they named themselves the successors to the Pharaohs. The later Ptolemies took on Egyptian traditions by marrying their siblings, had themselves portrayed on public monuments in Egyptian style and dress, and participated in Egyptian religious life. Hellenistic culture thrived in Egypt until the Muslim conquest. The Ptolemies had to fight native rebellions and were involved in foreign and civil wars that led to the decline of the kingdom and its annexation by the Roman Empire. It is a fabulously wealthy land.
Favored by the Greco-Egyptian Aristocracy and much of the nation, the young Ptolemy XIV enjoys a number of privileges. However, of late, he is still too young to rule, and relies primarily on the eunuch Pothinus, his regent, to help him maintain rule of his country. The Pro-Ptolemy party of Egypt is strongly disinclined to accept Cleopatra VII, Ptolemy's older sister and wife, as the legitimate ruler of Egypt.
Furthermore, while in the past an alliance with Rome was viewed as being mutually beneficial against Macedon and the Seleucids, the current Ptolemaic dynasty has now begun to view Rome as a rival, and thus is relatively unwilling to accept their direct dominance over Egyptian and Eastern Affairs. Opinion: Ambivalent
Desires:
Independence
Trade
Good Relations No Opinion:
Alliance
Opposes:
Annexation
Vassalization
In contrast to her younger brother and husband, Cleopatra is quite warm to Roman ambitions, though these are largely the result of a genuine rational self-interest rather than a desire to see Rome annex her Kingdom. Cleopatra is well aware that Ptolemy XIV's coming of age will render her privileges as superfluous. Moreover, considering that she is married to her brother, and that her only legal options for maintain a private and romantic life would be incestuous by nature, this further implies that her personal freedoms will be curtailed as well. Desperate for assistance, Cleopatra is likely to look for Roman benefactors, and even lovers.
Opinion: Warm
Desires:
Alliance
Trade
Good Relations No Opinion:
Independence
Vassalization
Opposes:
Annexation
[/FONT]
While generally irrelevant and immaterial to the inner workings of Royal intrigue, the Egyptian people were nevertheless still affected by the policies and decisions of the Pharoahs. By the end of the Ptolemaic Dynasty, popular support for the monarchy was beginning to deteriorate. Opinion: Neutral
Desires:
Independence
Trade
No Opinion:
Alliance
Good Relations
Opposes:
Annexation
Vassalization
Numidia
Relationship Status: Allies: Rivals: Mauretania
King: Jugurtha
Numidia (202 BC – 46 BC) was an ancient Berber kingdom in part of present-day Algeria and Tunisia in North Africa. The kingdom began as a sovereign state and later alternated between being a Roman province and being a Roman client state. Its King, Jugurtha is known to be an ambitious man and considers Romans a greedy and corrupt people. When he succeeded the throne as a young man, it was with Roman aid, but only because he had bribed Roman officials.
After the defeat of Carthage by the Roman Empire Mauretania became an ally of Rome. The Romans placed Juba II of Numidia as their client-king. When Juba died in 23 AD, his Roman-educated son Ptolemy of Mauretania succeeded him on the throne. Caligula killed Ptolemy in 40. Claudius annexed Mauretania directly as a Roman province in 44, under an imperial (not senatorial) governor.
Not depriving the Mauri of their line of kings would have contributed to preserving loyalty and order, it appears: "The Mauri, indeed, manifestly worship kings, and do not conceal their name by any disguise," Cyprian observed in 247, likely quoting a geographer rather than personal observation, in his brief euhemerist exercise in deflating the gods entitled On the Vanity of Idols.
Cretan/Cilician Pirates
Relationship Status: Hostile
King: Seleukos the Great Ravager
Last edited by Pontifex Maximus; September 18, 2016 at 04:42 PM.
Gaius Papius Mutilus: Consul of Italia, in command of one legion and 400 horse of Samnites
Lucius Cluentius: General, in command of one legion and 200 horse of the free city of Pompeii
Titus Vettius Scato: General, in command of one legion and 200 horse of Paeligni
Herius Asinius: General, in command of one legion and 200 horse of Marrucini
Total: 5 legions and 1,400 horse.
Faction goals: The Romans jealously guarded the rights and privileges associated with full Roman citizenship by only granting their allies and conquered peoples more limited arrangements of rights which might limit the right to vote, or alter the level at which a community, town, or city might be taxed. They initially wanted enfranchisement in the Roman political system and would be content to be put on an equal footing with the citizens of Rome. When this goal seemed impossible to achieve with the failure to pass a law granting the Italians full rights of citizenship, the Italian allies opted for independence.
Legio I Italica
Legio II Italica
Legio III Italica
Legio IV Italica
Legio V Italica
1,000 horse
Total: 5 legions and 1,000 horse.
Last edited by Pontifex Maximus; September 17, 2016 at 01:24 PM.
Does closed Family mean NPC? Or that you are using them?
I like the starting setting. Are there any Roman legions in the provinces? Can a player start with the Italians? Do you have a map of what the Italians control in Italy or is that a WIP?
__________________________________
The Mad Skylord - Yesterday at 10:09 PM
Jesus
You're a monster
I love it
__________________________________
Does closed Family mean NPC? Or that you are using them?
Closed means that no other players can register family members in that family except the player that created it
I like the starting setting. Are there any Roman legions in the provinces?
I racked my brain and I think its the best possible setting to start. Immediate action and crisis. And no there won't be, the provinces will be fairly vulnerable initially. I'm thinking about just making the proconsulships held by NPCs until the Social War ends. We won't have any ex-consul characters until the end of Year 1 anyway
Can a player start with the Italians?
You can control one of those commanders if you want, but they are basically doomed if they lose. The battle system doesn't require that people be in control of enemy factions to give battle orders like we used to, but that can still happen if someone wants to do it.
Do you have a map of what the Italians control in Italy or is that a WIP?
That's WIP. My understanding of it right now is that central Italy mostly remained loyal with areas of southern Italy being the most problematic
Last edited by Pontifex Maximus; September 17, 2016 at 01:48 PM.
Okmin and Rhapture are going to stumble in here at some point as well.
Here's me, stumbling in.
Are we restricted to historical families, or can I be unoriginal and bring back the Marii Aquilae for yet another daring expedition into the heart of Dacia?
Are we restricted to historical families, or can I be unoriginal and bring back the Marii Aquilae for yet another daring expedition into the heart of Dacia?
Bring back the eagles and let them fly high or crash and burn lol. Historical families aren't necessary. I might suggest them if someone wants to have a ready made family history upto 90 BC. But it is all unexplored story once we start anyway.
__________________________________
The Mad Skylord - Yesterday at 10:09 PM
Jesus
You're a monster
I love it
__________________________________
Are we restricted to historical families, or can I be unoriginal and bring back the Marii Aquilae for yet another daring expedition into the heart of Dacia?
You don't have to use a historical family, I use the names only just because they make me feel tingly. All right, three more to go
Updated with potential active members. Two to go until I will request a forum. I am also slated to post an advertisement site wide soliciting new players.
Ranks: Paterfamilias, Senator, Partrician.
Economic Branch: Urban Development Branch
Current Office: n/a
Age: 30(Born 120BC)
Traits:
Appuleia (Daughter of Lucius Appuleius Saturninus)
Wife of Marcus
Age: 20 (Born 110BC)
Marcus Aemilius Lepidus (the younger)
Age: 1 (born 91)
Last edited by General Brewster; September 25, 2016 at 05:24 PM.
Reason: WIP