VC Why Necromancer as Army General?

[Chlodwig I.]

Why should I use a Necromancer instead of an Vampire Count as Army General?

Is there any advantage if you use a Necromancer instead of a Vampire?

[drillmaster]

Wait for Ghorst. Otherwise no

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

[Påsan]

Necromancers heals units passivly, Vampires dont. But not really, no. In multi to save money in the death star maybe.

[Ichon]

The necromancers are MUCH weaker in campaign initially and even with 30 levels are still weaker than 30 level vampire though if you get a necromancer with the right items they can sometimes be as powerful as vampire lord.

I would be in favor of one simple change for Necromancers... instead of going to 0 magic reserve they should bottom out at 5 so with use of magic items and the final mana boosting skill on the skill tree Necromancers could cast 1-4 tier spells even in long battles but with a very long re-charge rate 1-2 minutes. 5th and 6th tier spells that cost over 10 mana would still cost too much mana.

[Chlodwig I.]

Okay I came to the same conclusion, so I will continue to only use VL as General and place if necessary a Necromancer Hero in my armies, but I prefer Vampires

[RGA]

Nah, it's not like the game is too difficult that you have to get the best of the best. If I play as Kemmler, I make my own rule that all generals should be necromancer.

[drillmaster]

True. I think a great part of the game should be self imposed immersion rules.

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk