Originally Posted by
Yayattasa
At one point: "Muslim bad, derp". Then "Wait, not all muslims". Then "Bosnians are cool, they aren't muslim enough". Please, when you decide on the next baseless argument you gonna throw around, tell me beforehand.
I don't care of religion, IQ and consanguinity rate is what matter to me.
To go further about it, and here you may perceive a certain sense of self-criticism(what most muslims obviously lack of):
From my point consanguinity isn't an absolute determining factor, however, when you pay more attention to what Western Mediterranean insular societies produce in term of structures, and this is very tied to clanic organizations which is subsidiarily resulting from how peoples are close, how connexe mariages are common(but 1th degree is rarer than in Maghrebian countries), you may conclude that both result in greater solidarities between peoples and...also structural violence and plenty of other things.
Corsica is like that, as Sardinia, Sicilia, and close areas in South Italia(Calabria and else)
Corsica is excluded from the next maps, but roughly Corsica shares more with that group of italian regions than saying...Parisian region or the New Hampshire. How peoples from the village of Sisco have gathered, do you think seriously you will see it in London from native British? No, but you will observe it in pakistani communities.
These maps are highly edifying:
Now the consanguinity.
http://thosewhocansee.blogspot.fr/20...d-nations.html
Maghrebian societies produce the same, but at larger scale and intensity. I don't say its bad or good, but from a typical progressist point, its not very indicated to have that beam of consanguinity/corruption/structural violence etc...not matter what is exactly the root of that. Notice that public institutions are stronger where clanic structures are weaker. Its quite a problem in any European country, even if your country is more liberal, more interventionnist how much its tolerate foreign communities.
Its 15 000 times superior to religion.