In my Bosporan campaign, as I mentioned in another thread, the Bosporans are doing very well economically, pulling in 15-20,000 denarii each turn. As I get further along and learn just how much the more advanced buildings cost, I'm not as worried about the economy being too strong, because even with all that money I still have to save up for some of the bigger upgrades. I have enough money to keep upgrading, but not enough that I can just buy everything I want.
However, I just captured the
Colossus of Rhodes, which gives my naval trade a 40% bonus, and my economy
really went through the roof, now averaging 35,000/turn (and this is with a rather modest 17 regions in my kingdom). Pergamum itself is bringing in 10,000 each turn.
I never really liked the Wonder bonuses, they feel a bit too 'gamey' for my tastes -- why would owning a giant statue boost naval trade throughout my entire kingdom? I could see it being a bonus for Rhodes, but there's no way it should have that big an impact across all my regions. Or why would controlling the
Tomb of Mausolos at Halicarnassus reduce building construction times 800 miles away in Tanais?
It just makes no logical sense, and it makes no gameplay sense either, not when I was already making so much money. At least in this campaign, it feels like a cheat.
So what do others think? Should the Wonder bonuses be reduced, or eliminated altogether? Or do you prefer them the way they are?